C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
( 1.3) × 10-4 s-1. The rate of this decay increases by a factor of
10 in the presence of 12 equiv of cyclohexene. Thus, both 1a and
2a are reactive toward cyclohexene even at -70 °C.
Synthesis of the first and so far only bona fide example of an
oxoiron(V) complex, [(TAML)FeVdO]-, where TAML is a mac-
rocyclic tetraamide ligand, was reported in 2007. The EPR spectra
observed for 1a and 2a differ distinctly from the EPR spectrum
reported for [(TAML)FeVdO]- (g1 ) 1.99, g2 ) 1.97, g3 ) 1.74).7
This difference can be caused by diverse ligand fields. The most
specific spectral feature of [(TAML)FeVdO]- (distinguishing it
from FeIII and FeIIIFeIV species found in the systems based on 1
and 2) is the high-field peak at g ) 1.74. This peak is much broader
than those at g ) 1.97 and 1.99.7 Similar peaks at g ) 1.70 and
1.53 were observed for [(BPMEN)FeVdO(S)]3+ and
[(TPA)FeVdO(S)]3+, respectively (Figures 1 and S2). These peaks
are much broader than the corresponding low-field peaks, as in the
case of [(TAML)FeVdO]-. However, it is evident that further
studies are needed for the unambiguous assignment of the observed
intermediates to the oxoiron(V) species.
To establish that intermediate 2a does indeed drive the catalytic
cyclohexene epoxidation by catalyst system 2/H2O2, we have
compared the yield of cyclohexene oxide formed in the catalyst
system 2/H2O2/cyclohexene at -70 °C ([2] ) 0.027 M, [H2O2] )
0.27 M, [cyclohexene] ) 0.81 M) with that expected from the
kinetic data for 2a. The EPR spectra of the above catalyst system
in the absence of cyclohexene show that the concentration of 2a is
practically constant during 1 h at -70 °C and amounts to (2.0 (
0.8) × 10-3 M (Figure S3). In order for the concentration of 2a to
reach a steady state, its rate of formation, WF(2a), must equal its
rate of decay, WF(2a) ) k × [2a], where k is the rate constant of
self-decay of 2a at -70 °C, and [2a] is the steady state concentration
of 2a in the absence of cyclohexene. In the presence of cyclohexene,
2a cannot be detected, in agreement with its high reactivity toward
cyclohexene at -70 °C (Figure S4). Hence, the rate of formation
of cyclohexene oxide is expected to be equal to the rate of 2a
formation (WF(epoxide) ) WF(2a)). The expected concentration of
cyclohexene oxide formed during t seconds of the catalytic reaction
is given by following equation
The main value of this paper is EPR spectroscopic trapping of
the actual epoxidizing agents of bioinspired catalyst systems based
on nonheme iron complexes and hydrogen peroxide. Despite the
nature of these iron-oxygen species is not entirely clear, their key
role in epoxidation has been reliably established.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research, Grants 06-03-32214 and 09-03-00087, for
financial support. We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Hans Brintzinger
for fruitful comments.
[cyclohexene oxide] ) k × [2a] × t
(1)
Values of k ) (5.4 ( 1.3) × 10-4 s-1 and [2a] ) (2.0 ( 0.8) ×
10-3 M, derived from our measurements, would thus predict that
the cyclohexene oxide formed during 1 h of the catalytic reaction
at -70 °C (eq 1) should reach a concentration of (3.9 ( 2.5) ×
10-3 M. Experimentally, a concentration of cyclohexene oxide of
7.4 × 10-3 M was determined by gas chromatographic product
analysis (see SI for details). That the predicted and experimental
epoxide yields are close strongly supports the key role of 2a in
selective epoxidation. The results of catalytic cyclohexene epoxi-
dation by systems 1,2/CH3CO3H(m-CPBA) are presented in Table
S3.
To view the role of intermediates such as 1a and 2a in a broader
perspective, we have compared the reactivity patterns of complexes
1-6 with regard to cyclohexene epoxidation by H2O2. The results
of these studies (Table S4) show that only the systems 1-4/H2O2
demonstrate epoxidation activity at 25 °C. Interestingly, intermedi-
ates of the type 1a, 2a, 3a, and 4a, with EPR parameters presented
in Table S5, were observed only in systems 1-4/CH3CO3H and
1-4/m-CPBA (Figures 1, S2, and S5). In the systems 5,6/m-CPBA
and 5,6/CH3CO3H, the only unidentified signal near g ) 4 is
observed.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental proce-
dures, EPR spectra, Table S1 of the influence of olefin addition on the
decay of 1a, Table S2 of maximum concentration of 1a and 2a, Tables
S3 and S4 of epoxide yields for cyclohexene oxidations, Table S5 of
1
EPR spectroscopic parameters for S ) /2 iron-oxygen species. This
References
(1) (a) Costas, M.; Mehn, M. P.; Jensen, M. P.; Que, L., Jr. Chem. ReV 2004,
104, 939–986. (b) Tshuva, E. Y.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 987–
1012. (c) Kryatov, S. V.; Rybak-Akimova, E. V.; Schindler, S. Chem. ReV.
2005, 105, 2175–2226. (d) Que, L., Jr.; Tolman, W. B. Nature 2008, 455,
333–340.
(2) (a) Chen, K.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6327–6337. (b)
Chen, K.; Costas, M.; Kim, J.; Tipton, A. K.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 3026–3035. (c) Costas, M.; Que, L., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2179–2181. (d) Bukowski, M. R.; Comba, P.; Lienke, A.; Limberg,
C.; de Laorden, C. L.; Mas-Balleste´, R.; Merz, M.; Que, L., Jr. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3446–3449. (e) Taktak, S.; Kryatov, S. V.; Haas, T. E.;
Rybak-Akimova, E. V. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 259, 24–34. (f)
Company, A.; Go´mez, L.; Gu¨ell, M.; Ribas, X.; Luis, J. M.; Que, L., Jr.;
Costas, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15766–15767.
(3) Mas-Balleste´, R.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15964–15972.
(4) (a) Chen, K.; Que, L., Jr. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1375–1376. (b) Kaizer, J.;
Klinker, E. J.; Oh, N. Y.; Rohde, J.-U.; Song, W. J.; Stubna, A.; Kim, J.;
Mu¨nck, E.; Nam, W.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 472–473.
(c) Jensen, M. P.; Costas, M.; Ho, Y. N.; Kaizer, J.; Mairata i Payeras, A.;
Mu¨nck, E.; Que, L., Jr.; Rohde, J.-U.; Stubna, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 10512–10525. (d) Oh, N. Y.; Seo, M. S.; Lim, M. H.; Consugar, M. B.;
Park, M. J.; Rohde, J.-U.; Han, J.; Kim, K. M.; Kim, J.; Que, L., Jr. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 5644–5646. (e) Thibon, A.; England, J.; Martinho, M.;
Young, V. G., Jr.; Frisch, J. R.; Guillot, R.; Girerd, J.-J.; Mu¨nck, E.; Que,
L., Jr.; Banse, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7064–7067.
(5) (a) Lim, M. H.; Rohde, J.-U.; Stubna, A.; Bukowski, M. R.; Costas, M.;
Ho, R. Y. N.; Mu¨nck, E.; Nam, W.; Que, L., Jr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2003, 100, 3665–3670. (b) Duban, E. A.; Bryliakov, K. P.; Talsi, E. P. Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 852–857.
Intermediates 1a and 2a display EPR spectra characteristic of S
1
) /2 species. Several iron-oxygen intermediates, most notably
species of the type FeIIIsOOC(O)R6 and FeVdO7 can in principle
exhibit such EPR spectra (Table S5) and should thus be considered
as potential structural models. An assignment of 1a and 2a to low-
spin acylperoxo complexes of the type [(L)FeIII(OOC(O)R)(S)]2+
can be excluded, since the EPR parameters of complexes
t
[(L)FeIII(OOR′)(S)]2+ are sensitive to the nature of R′ (H or Bu)
(Table S5). However, one and the same complex 2a was observed
in the systems 2/m-CPBA, 2/CH3CO3H, and 2/H2O2. The only
reasonable possibility thus appears to be that 1a and 2a are low-
spin oxoiron(V) intermediates of the type [(TPA)FeVdO(S)]3+ and
[(BPMEN)FeVdO(S)]3+, respectively (S ) H2O or CH3CN).
(6) Yamaguchi, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Morishima, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
4058–4065.
(7) de Oliveira, F. T.; Chanda, A.; Banerjee, D.; Shan, X.; Mondal, S.; Que, L.,
Jr.; Bominaar, E. L.; Mu¨nck, E.; Collins, T. J. Science 2007, 315, 835–838.
JA902659C
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 31, 2009 10799