Scheme 2 Reactivity of FeII centers with H2O2 (X = CH2SiMe3 in 2 and
X = OH during the catalytic cycle).
Fig. 2 Iron K-edge k3-weighted EXAFS (left) and Fourier transform
(right) of solid (2). Dashed lines: spherical wave theory, solid lines:
experimental.
been fully characterised by elemental analysis, IR and EXAFS
spectroscopies. In the presence of H2O2, this system catalyses
the epoxidation of cyclohexene, but Fenton chemistry is the
major pathway of oxidation leading to 2-cyclohexenol and 2-
cyclohexenone. Further studies are currently under way to gen-
erate stable single-site Fe oxidation catalysts.
iron, which is consistent with 2 being the major species (Table 1).
The Fe–C and Fe–N bond distances measured by EXAFS are in
good agreement with those obtained by X-ray crystallography for
15,19,20
˚
˚
1 (Fe–C ∼ 2.042 A and Fe–N ∼ 2.025 A).
Finally, the Fe–
OSi bond length is also very close to measured values of similar
5,21
˚
Fe molecular complexes (1.86–1.91 A).
Acknowledgements
Table 1 EXAFS Parameters for the solid 2.a The errors generated by the
EXAFS fitting program “RoundMidnight 2005”16 are indicated between
parentheses
NR is grateful to the Spanish MEC for a postdoctoral fellowship.
References
Neighbouring
atom of Fe
Coordination
number
Distance from
Fe/A
Debye–Waller
2
−2
˚
˚
factor/r A )
1 J. D. Lipscomb and L. Que, Jr, JBIC, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem., 1998, 3,
331.
2 M.-H. Baik, M. Newcomb, R. A. Friesner and S. J. Lippard, Chem.
Rev., 2003, 103, 2385.
3 G. I. Panov, A. S. Kharitonov and V. I. Sobolev, Appl. Catal., A, 1993,
98, 1.
4 L. V. Pirutko, V. S. Chernyavsky, A. K. Uriarte and G. I. Panov, Appl.
Catal., A, 2002, 227, 143.
5 C. Nozaki, C. G. Lugmair, A. T. Bell and T. D. Tilley, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 13194.
–OSi
1
1
2
1.85(2)
1.97(4)
2.10(3)
0.004(2)
0.002(1)
0.007(2)
–CH2Si(CH3)3
=
Ar–N C–
a
−1
0
˚
˚
Dk: [2.4–10.9 A ] − DR: [0.2–2.2 A]; DE = −4.8 1.4 eV (the same for
2
all shells); S0 = 1.0; Fit residue: q = 6.0%.
6 A. W. Holland, G. Li, A. M. Shahin, G. J. Long, A. T. Bell and T. D.
Tilley, J. Catal., 2005, 235, 150.
7 A. Zecchina and G. Berlier, NATO ASI Ser., Ser. 2, 2001, 13, 135.
8 M. C. White, A. G. Doyle and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001,
123, 7194.
9 G. Dubois, A. Murphy and T. D. P. Stack, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 2469.
10 M. Costas, M. P. Mehn, M. P. Jensen and L. Que, Jr, Chem. Rev., 2004,
104, 939.
11 G. J. P. Britovsek, J. England and A. J. P. White, Inorg. Chem., 2005,
44, 8125.
12 G. J. P. Britovsek, J. England, S. K. Spitzmesser, A. J. P. White and D. J.
Williams, Dalton Trans., 2005, 945.
13 G. J. P. Britovsek, J. England and A. J. P. White, Dalton Trans., 2006,
1399.
14 C. Cope´ret, M. Chabanas, S.-A. Petroff, Romain and J.-M. Basset,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 156.
15 S. C. Bart, E. J. Hawrelak, A. K. Schmisseur, E. Lobkovsky and P. J.
Chirik, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 237.
With 2 in hand, the epoxidation of cyclohexene was carried out.
No reaction was observed when BuOOH was used, and using
t
CH3CO3H with or without catalyst gave cyclohexene oxide in
95% yield within 15 min. With H2O2 (30% in H2O, 150 equiv.)
in CH3CN, cyclohexene (750 equiv.) is slowly converted into
cyclohexene oxide along with 2-cyclohexenol and 2-cyclohexenone
in the presence of 2 (1 equiv.), while no conversion was observed
in the presence of pure silica. After one hour, 7.3% conversion
is achieved, and the selectivity in epoxide is 24%, the major
products being 2-cyclohexenol (32%) and 2-cyclohexenone (44%).
Increasing the reaction time, however, decreased the yield of
epoxide. The obtained selectivities are close to those reported
by Tilley et al. using an isolated FeIII siloxy species, and no
Fe leaching was observed.5 While the epoxide could probably
be formed from the putative FeIIOOH species, this species may
readily decompose to generate hydroxyl radicals, so that the major
pathway corresponds to Fenton chemistry as evidenced by the
formation of 2-cyclohexenol and 2-cyclohexenone (Scheme 2).22
16 A. Michalowicz, Logiciels pour la Chimie, Socie´te´ Franc¸aise de Chimie,
Paris, 1991.
17 B. Lengeler and P. Eisenberger, Phys. Rev. B, 1980, 21, 4507.
18 S. I. Zabinsky, J. J. Rehr, A. Aukudinov, R. C. Albers and M. J. Eller,
Phys. Rev. B, 1995, 52, 2995.
19 M. D. Fryzuk, D. B. Leznoff, E. S. F. Ma, S. J. Rettig and V. G. Young,
Jr., Organometallics, 1998, 17, 2313.
Conclusions
20 A. M. LaPointe, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2003, 345, 359.
21 F. Liu, K. D. John, B. L. Scott, R. T. Baker, K. C. Ott and W. Tumas,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3127.
A route to well-defined isolated FeII centers dispersed onto a
silica surface has been described. The alkyl derivative 2 has
22 S. Goldstein and D. Meyerstein, Acc. Chem. Res., 1999, 32, 547.
5548 | Dalton Trans., 2007, 5546–5548
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
©