1
090
H. B. K u¨ c u¨ k, A. Yusufo g˘ lu
Shimatsu\DGU-20A5 HPLC apparatus fitted with a Chi-
ralcel OD Chiral column.
corresponding methyl ester (R)-1b, and analysed on the
Chiralcel OD column.
Methyl (R)-3-hydroxytetradecanoate ((R)-1b, C H O )
1
5 30 3
3
Chiral analysis
(R)-1a (100 mg, 0.407 mmol) was dissolved in 3 cm
3
methanol. Then 3 cm BF /MeOH reagent was added, and
3
The enantiospecifity of the enzymatic reaction was deter-
mined after purification of the products (R)-1a and (S)-1b
by column chromatography. The enantiomeric excesses of
the products (R)-1a and (S)-1b were determined by chiral
HPLC using a Chiralcel OD column. (R)-1a and (S)-1a did
not give any signals on the Chiralcel OD column. On the
other hand, their corresponding methyl esters (R)-1b and
the solutions were refluxed at 100 °C for 2 min. After the
reaction was completed, excess alcohol was removed under
3
vacuum at room temperature. Then 30 cm petroleum ether
3
and 20 cm water were added, and the solution was shaken
vigorously for 5 min before the layers were allowed to
separate. The bottom layer was dried over anhydrous
Na SO and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give
2
4
(
S)-1b could be detected on the Chiralcel OD column. In
(R)-1b as white crystals in 100 % yield (105 mg) and
2
0
-1 -1
g
3
order to determine the ee values by chiral HPLC the
racemic substrate (R,S)-1b was separated on Chiralcel OD
column into its enantiomers (R)-1b and (S)-1b. (R)-1b
elutes before (S)-1b. (R)-1a was transformed to its corre-
sponding methyl ester (R)-1b for measurement of its ee.
Conversion (X) and enantiomeric ratio (enantioselectivity,
E) were calculated according to Chen et al.’s equation [20].
The absolute configurations of the acid and ester were
assigned by comparison of their optical rotations with the
literature data. The results are summarised in Table 1.
greater than 99 % ee. [a]D = -18.4/ ° dm
cm
(c = 1, CHCl ). HPLC analysis: Chiralcel OD chiral
column, mobile phase n-hexane/2-propanol 98:2, flow rate
3
3
0.8 cm /min, wavelength 220 nm; t : 8.05 min for the (R)-
R
isomer, not observed for the (S)-isomer. The spectroscopic
data were identical to those of (S)-1b.
Methyl (S)-3-hydroxytetradecanoate ((S)-1b, C H O )
1
5 30 3
This compound was obtained as white crystals in 98 % ee
(
Table 1, entry 1). M.p.: 30–31 °C (Ref. [8] 28–30 °C);
20 -1 -1 3
[
a] = ?18.1/ ° dm
g
cm (c = 1, CHCl ). HPLC
3
D
analysis: Chiralcel OD chiral column, mobile phase
3
n-hexane/2-propanol 98:2, flow rate 0.8 cm /min, wave-
General procedure for the enantioselective synthesis
of 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid and its methyl ester
length 220 nm; t : 8.05 min for the (R)-isomer, 10.70 min
R
for the (S)-isomer.
Enzymatic hydrolyses were carried out using the conditions
described in Table 2 varying the substrate/PPL weight ratios
and reaction times (entries 1–8). Different suspension
amounts of the racemic ester (R,S)-1b (1,000 mg,
(
S)-3-Hydroxytetradecanoic acid ((S)-1a, C H O )
14 28 3
3
S)-1b (100 mg, 0.387 mmol), 0.09 g KOH in 1 cm water
(
3
and 1 cm methanol were placed in a round-bottomed flask
which was mounted over a magnetic stirrer and refluxed for
3
.88 mmol) were incubated with PPL (Sigma L-3126) in
6
0 min. Unreacted ester, if any, was removed by ether
water at pH 7.6 (citric acid/Na HPO buffer solutions
2
4
extraction and the carboxylic acid was recovered by the
methods given below. The aqueous portion was acidified to
(
0.02 M)) and 36 °C. The enzyme was settled, unless the
reaction mixture was stirred or shaken. Thus, the resulting
suspension was shaken in an ultrasonic bath. The progress of
the reaction was monitored by TLC (developing solvent
CHCl /CH OH/CH COOH = 100:10:1). After the time
pH 2 with 6 N hydrochloric acid and extracted with ether
3
3 9 5 cm ). The combined ether extracts were dried over
(
Na SO and concentrated on a rotary evaporator. The acid
4
2
3
3
3
(S)-1a was obtained after drying under vacuum as a white
powder in 80 % yield (76 mg) and 98 % ee (Table 1, entry 1).
shown in Table 2, the reaction was stopped with the addition
of CH Cl . The enzyme was removed by vacuum filtration
2
2
20
-1 -1
3
[a]D = ? 16.1/ ° dm
analysed on Chiralcel OD column as its methyl ester (S)-1b.
g
cm (c = 1, CHCl ). It was
3
over Celite and washed with CH Cl . The organic phase was
2
2
separated and washed with distilled water. After drying over
anhydrous Na SO , the solvent was removed in vacuo to give
The spectroscopic data were identical to those of (R)-1a.
2
4
a mixture of (R)-1a and (S)-1b that was separated via column
chromatography (flash SiO , developing solvent CHCl /
Acknowledgments This work was supported by Scientific Research
Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University, project number
T-1195/0112001.
2
3
CH OH/CH COOH = 100:10:1).
3
3
(
This compound was obtained as a white powder in greater
R)-3-Hydroxytetradecanoic acid ((R)-1a, C H O )
14 28 3
References
than 99 % ee (Table 1, entry 3). M.p.: 71–72 °C (Ref. [13]
2
D
0
-1 -1
3
7
2.0–72.5 °C); [a] = -16/ ° dm
g
cm
(c = 1,
CHCl ). HPLC analysis: (R)-1a was converted to its
1. Schletter J, Heine H, Ulmer AJ (1995) Arch Microbiol 164:383
2. Ulevitch RJ, Tobias PS (1995) Annu Rev Immunol 13:437
3
1
23