Page 3 of 4
Please dC oh ne omt Ca do j um s mt margins
DOI: 10.1039/C7CC02747H
Journal Name
COMMUNICATION
which were used in all calculations. The final R
1
was 0.0359
and Th increased fluorescence. Notably, Zn increased
fluorescence by a factor of 5, with a quantum yield of 1.6 %.
(
I>=2u(I)) and wR was 0.0755 (all data). CCDC: 1497023.
2
1
1
1
4000
2000
0000
§
Funding was provided by a grant from the Defence Threat
1
Reduction Agency, Basic Research Award # HDTRA1‐11‐1‐0044 to
Auburn University.
1:UO2 3:1
1
:UO2 3:2
1:UO2 3:3
1
1
1
1
1
1
:UO2 3:4
:UO2 3:5
:UO2 3:6
:UO2 3:7
:UO2 3:8
:UO2 3:9
1
Clean Power Plan, Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon
Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources:
Electric Utility Generating Units, 2015, Vol. 80, 64661.
Administration, U. S. Energy Information Agency: Annual
Energy Review 2015; DOE/EIA‐0384 (2010); U. S. Department
of Energy: Washington, DC, April 2015, 2015; p 269.
J. Morrison, Chem. Eng. News 2015, 93, 45; J. Morrison,
Chem. Eng. News. 2015, 93, 19.
8
6
4
2
000
000
000
000
0
2
3
4
A.
B.
290
340
390
440
490
540
L
L:UO2 1:1
L:Zn 1:1
L:Cu 1:1
L:Co 1:1
L:VO 1:1
L:Th 1:1
L:Mn 1:1
L:Ni 1:1
L:Fe 1:1
590
N. H. Anderson, S. O. Odoh, U. J. Williams, A. J. Lewis, G. L.
Wagner, J. Lezama‐Pacheco, S. A. Kozimor, L. Gagliardi, E. J.
Schelter, S. C. Bart, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4690; L.
Chatelain, R. Scopelliti, M. Mazzanti, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016,
138, 1784; J. K. Pagano, K. A. Erickson, B. L. Scott, D. E.
Morris, R. Waterman, J. L. Kiplinger, J. Organomet. Chem.,
2017, 829, 79; M. L. Neidig, D. L. Clark, R. L. Martin, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 394.
Wavelength (nm)
5
6
A. R. Fox, S. C. Bart, K. Meyer, C. C. Cummins, Nature 2008,
4
55; D. P. Halter, F. W. Heinemann, J. Bachmann, K. Meyer,
Nature 2016, 530, 317.
P. L. Arnold, J. H. Farnaby, R. C. White, N. Kaltsoyannis, M. G.
Gardiner, J. B. Love, Chemical Science 2014,
Kaltsoyannis, Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 3407.
5, 756; N.
7
8
I. T. Ho, Z. Zhang, M. Ishida, V. M. Lynch, W.‐Y. Cha, Y. M.
Sung, D. Kim, J. L. Sessler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4281;
R. Copping, B. Jeon, C. D. Pemmaraju, S. Wang, S. J. Teat, M.
Janousch, T. Tyliszczak, A. Canning, N. Grønbech‐Jensen, D.
Prendergast, D. K. Shuh, Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 2506; J. J.
Kiernicki, D. P. Cladis, P. E. Fanwick, M. Zeller, S. C. Bart, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11115.
B. A. Maynard, J. C. Brooks, E. E. Hardy, C. J. Easley, A. E. V.
Gorden, Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 4428; M. S. Bharara, K.
Heflin, S. Tonks, K. L. Strawbridge, A. E. V. Gorden, Dalton
Trans. 2008, 22, 2966.
3
75
475
575
675
775
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 4a.
dichloromethane solution with an increasing ratios of
UO (NO 6H O, from 3:1 to 3:10 1:UO Figure 4b. Solution
fluorescence of a serial titration of 1 with indicated metal salts, shown
is the 1:1 ration in methanol solution at 365 nm excitation.
UV‐Visible spectra of a serial titration of 1 in
2
3
)
2
2
2
.
9
2 2
In summary, UO 1 and UO 2 complexes with uncommon
pyridine coordination have been synthesized and characterized 10 K. D. Bhatt, B. A. Makwana, D. J. Vyas, D. R. Mishra, V. K. Jain,
in solution and in the solid state. This pentadentate binding
ligand fully occupies the equatorial binding environment,
removing the necessity of a coordinating solvent molecule or
ligand rearrangement allowing to quickly and selectively bind
J. Lumin. 2014, 146, 450; I.‐T. Ho, J. L. Sessler, S. Sam
Gambhirbc, J. V. Jokerst, Analyst 2015, 140, 3731; R. Ansari,
Z. Mosayebzadeh, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2013, 299, 1597;
A. E. V. Gorden, J. Xu, K. N. Raymond, P. Durbin, Chem. Rev.
2
003, 103, 4207.
uranyl in a one to one fashion. These complexes have a distinct 11 K. Takao, M. Kato, S. Takao, A. Nagasawa, G. Bernhard, C.
response for uranyl over common first‐row transition metals in
the UV. This ligand showed a significant increase in fluorescence
in the presence of zinc, inspiring interest in use as a zinc
fluorescent sensor, which will be the subject of future work. 16
Hennig, Y. Ikeda, Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 2349. K. Takao, S.
Tsushima, S. Takao, A. C. Scheinost, G. Bernhard, Y. Ikeda, C.
Hennig, Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 9602.
1
2 O. Horeglad, G. Nocton, Y. Filinchuk, J. Pecaut, M. Mazzanti
Chem. Commun. 2009, 14, 1843; A. Valkonen, G. M.
Lombardo, K. Rissanen, F. Punzo, M. Cametti, Dalton Trans.,
2
017, Advance Article, DOI:10.1039/C6DT04773D.
Notes and references
13 C. C. Gatto, E. Schulz Lang, A. Gast, U. Abram, Inorg. Chim.
Acta, 2004, 357 4405; A. Kupfer, A. Hagenbach, D. WIlle, U.
Abram, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 2004, 630, 735.
‡
UO
2 52 3 4
1 Crystal Data for C40H N O U (M =876.87): orthorhombic,
space group Pccn (no. 56), a = 13.9974(3) Å, b = 23.5111(5) Å, c =
1
4 G. Paolucci, G. Marangoni, G. Bandoli, D. A. Clemente, J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1980, , 1304; J. L. Lapka, A.
3
2
4
3.6244(5) Å, V = 7774.7(3) Å , Z = 8, T = 180(2) K, μ(MoKα) =
.217 mm , Dcalc = 1.498 g/mm , 93148 reflections measured
8
‐
1
3
Paulenova, M. Yu. Alyapyshev, V. A. Babain, R. S. Herbst, J. D.
Law, Radiochim. Acta, 97, 291; J. M. Harrowfield, N. Lugan,
G. H. Shahverdizadeh, A. A. Soudi, P. Thuery, Eur. J. Inorg.
(
3.386 ≤ 2Θ ≤ 61.054), 11882 unique (Rint = 0.0538, Rsigma = 0.0376)
which were used in all calculations. The final R was 0.0305 (I >
σ(I)) and wR was 0.0699 (all data). CCDC: 1469301. UO 2 Crystal
U (M =713.54): monoclinic, space group P2 /c
no. 14), a = 22.8062(10) Å, b = 7.2736(3) Å, c = 14.7805(6) Å, β =
1
2
2
2
Chem. 2006,
5 C. R. Martinez and B. L. Iverson, Chem. Sci., 2012,
6 K. P. Carter, A. M. Young, A. E. Palmer, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114
564; A. T. Aron, K. M. Ramos‐Torres, J. A. Cotruvo, Jr., C. J.
Chang, Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2434.
2, 389.
Data for C29
H
21
N
3
O
4
1
1
1
3, 2191.
(
,
3
9
6
7.3343(5)°, V = 2431.78(18) Å , Z = 4, T = 180.45 K, μ(Mo Kα) =
.720 mm , Dcalc = 1.9488 g/mm , 61345 reflections measured
4
‐
1
3
(
3.6 ≤ 2Θ ≤ 63.04), 8098 unique (Rint = 0.0473, Rsigma = 0.0295)
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1‐3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins