J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 110, No. 4, 22 January 1999
Tromp, Spieser, and Neilson
2149
and 1.58 Å in the temperature range considered here. With a
covalent O–H distance of 0.975 Å and a hydrogen bond
O–O distance of 2.52 Å, it follows that the angle O...H–O is
between 160° and 170°. Values close to 180° should prob-
ably be expected in disordered liquid systems. A strong, lin-
ear hydrogen bond is characteristically found in crystalline
systems between highly electronegative donors and accep-
tors with a large excess of negative charge. A short average
hydrogen bond is therefore in line with the strong acidity of
part of the oxygen atoms of PA. The H–O covalent bond
length seems significantly longer than the values usually
found on SANDALS, such as 0.960͑5͒ in ambient 0.1 M
FIG. 5. Schematic representation of two neighboring H PO molecules in
liquid 100% phosphoric acid, with average distances as observed by neutron
diffraction. Units are Å.
3
4
14
LiCl ͑Ref. 13͒ and 0.950͑5͒ in water at 95 bar. The value
obtained from reactor data,15 0.971͑5͒, is only slightly lower
than that found in PA ͑The more limited Q range of reactor
data may cause truncation errors in the Fourier transform and
affect the peak position͒. It is tentatively suggested that the
strong hydrogen bond in PA stretches to some extent the
covalent H–O, although the small differences found in the
O–H bond length can well be artifacts. Even if no artifacts
play a role, it is not clear whether a longer O–H bond in PA
as compared with water is directly related to high acidity or
just to the difference in the chemical environment. No other
inorganic oxyacids have been studied in the liquid state with
neutron scattering combined with H/D substitution. All neu-
tron scattering data on acidic H–O bond lengths have been
obtained in the crystalline state, where quite long distances
by intramolecular correlations at 1.52 Å ͑O–P͒ and 2.52 Å
͑O–O͒. For the assignment of the features observed at higher
distances we refer to the results of MD. Above 3 Å, MD
reproduces the experimental data reasonably well. Its decom-
position into a contribution from the intermolecular parts of
gOO(r) and gOP(r) ͓g (r) does not contribute to any sig-
PP
nificant extent͔ shows that the peak at 4.9 Å and a weak
feature near 7 Å are probably due to O–O correlations, while
O–P correlations give rise to the peaks at 3.7 and 5.6 Å. In
the range 2.5–3.5 Å, the performance of the MD simulation
is quite poor. This is exactly the range of distances in which
O–O correlations between hydrogen bonded O atoms are
expected. The mismatch is probably caused by the overesti-
mation of the hydrogen bond length and incorrect configura-
tion of the hydrogen bond and has already been observed in
the MD result of gHX(r). Considering the very clear signa-
ture of hydrogen bonding in the experimental gHX(r), an
effect of hydrogen bonding on gXX(r) is anticipated. There-
fore, it is concluded that the hydrogen bonded O–O correla-
tion is hidden under the intramolecular O–O correlation at
8
are found, but an influence of the crystal field cannot be
excluded.
There is a small, but significant, temperature dependence
in gHX(r) ͑Fig. 2͒. At 60 °C the H...O hydrogen bond feature
position is increased by 0.03 Å and appears less pronounced
than in the ambient data. However, the number of hydrogen
bonds has not changed significantly. Correspondingly, as a
result of the less pronounced hydrogen bonding, the intramo-
lecular H–P correlation ͑2.2 Å͒ becomes better defined. The
source of change with temperature of the intramolecular
2.52 Å. On the safe assumption that it is completely due to
O–O correlations this interpretation is confirmed by integra-
tion of the peak, which gives a coordination number
O
O
H–O correlation across the PO tetrahedron ͑between 2.5
n (2.2,3) of 3.8, whereas 3 is expected for an isolated PO
4
4
and 3.5 Å͒ is less obvious: the H–O2 correlation ͑Fig. 5͒
strengthens with temperature, most probably due to weaker
hydrogen bonding. However, the H–O3 and H–O4 correla-
tions do not show any change. A possible explanation is the
presence of some intermolecular H–O correlation in this re-
gion. The effect of intramolecular change may be compen-
sated or moderated by this in some way. Interestingly, in
gXX(r) there is no appreciable temperature dependence. This
tetrahedron. The difference of 0.8 must at least be partly due
to hydrogen bonded O atoms at about 2.5 Å.
C. The function gHH„r…
The function gHH(r) represents the radially averaged
spatial correlation of H atoms, which is relatively featureless
͑Fig. 4͒. The shoulder between 1.9 and 2.6 Å on the left hand
slope of the main, intramolecular feature at 3.5 Å is probably
due to correlations across a hydrogen bond ͑Fig. 5͒. In water
this correlation is found at a similar distance ͑2.3 Å͒ ͑Fig. 4͒.
We also note that at 25 °C, some intramolecular structure
between H atoms across the tetrahedron is still resolved: be-
tween 2.6 and 3 Å.
suggests that the PO tetrahedral frame of the PA molecule is
4
not affected by an increase in temperature from 25 to 60 °C.
Consequently, all temperature dependence in the structure of
PA as probed by neutron scattering appears to be due to the
changing interaction of H atoms with their surroundings.
Also, because neither the intramolecular part, or the intermo-
lecular part of gXX(r) is affected by temperature, there is
probably no preferential relative orientation of neighboring
V. DISCUSSION
The results for gHX(r) ͑Fig. 2͒ clearly show that the
hydrogen bonds in PA are shorter, and therefore stronger
than in water ͑1.8 Å͒. By combining the information in
gHX(r) and gXX(r) an average hydrogen bond angle can be
calculated. The length of the hydrogen bond is between 1.55
PO tetrahedra, which otherwise would be destroyed to some
4
extent by increasing the temperature. With respect to tem-
perature effects on gHH(r), changes in the range 1.9–2.6 Å
are consistent with a weaker hydrogen bond at higher tem-
perature. However, they are not very well separable from the
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
128.237.133.58 On: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:23:11