J. Liu et al. / Journal of Catalysis 374 (2019) 171–182
173
(
NH
catalyst (50 mg) was first pretreated in a He flow (40 mL/min) at
00 °C for 1 h. After the temperature was cooled down to 100 °C,
NH adsorption was performed at 100 °C for 1 h. Then, the catalyst
was purged with a He flow until a steady baseline was obtained.
Finally, NH -TPD was carried out in a He flow (40 mL/min) with
the sample being heated to 450 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min, and the
effluent gas was analyzed by TCD. The amount of desorbed NH
3
-TPD) was carried out using a U-shaped quartz reactor. The
Detailed examples how to determine the HCHO conversion, (AA
+ MA) yield/formation rate, selectivity to all the products as well as
carbon balance are demonstrated in the Supplementary Material.
In our previous study [18], the issue of mass transport limita-
tion had been studied carefully, the results indicated that the
impact of internal and external diffusion was proved to be insignif-
icant under the applied operating conditions. In the current study,
the operating conditions are nearly identical to those employed in
our previous study; therefore, the mass transport limitations are
essentially eliminated.
2
3
3
3
(
(
(
in
0.01 mol/L) was used to absorb the released NH
0.01 mol/L) was used as the titrant. CO -TPD was performed sim-
lmol/g) was determined by a titration, in which a HCl solution
3
. A NaOH solution
2
ilarly and the effluent gas was analyzed by TCD.
For the V element of different oxidation state, the relative sur-
face concentration can be estimated through deconvolution analy-
sis of a specific XPS peak. For the same batch of sample measured
employing identical conditions as well as the same parameters
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Xrd
4
+
5+
adopted for deconvolution analysis, comparison of the V /V
The XRD patterns of the VPO samples activated under various
conditions plus the reference phase PDFs are shown in Fig. S1.
The XRD patterns of the three single-phase VPO samples and three
phase-modulated VPO samples are displayed individually with the
PDF(s) of the related reference phase(s) (Fig. 1). In some cases, the
phase-modulated VPO samples prepared via simple mixing and
mechanical ball milling are displayed together for direct compar-
ison (Fig. 1e-f). According to the literature works [18,60,61], the
phase composition of catalyst can be significantly affected by the
applied activation conditions (atmosphere and temperature). As
shown in Fig. 1a, all the diffraction lines (at 2h = 19.5°, 22.0°,
ratios over different samples is reasonable. The deviation of such
analysis is generally < ±5% in relative amount.
2.4. Catalyst evaluation
Catalyst evaluation was carried out at atmospheric pressure. All
the catalyst powders were pressed, crushed, and sieved to 20–40
mesh for activity evaluation. Two reactors were used for catalyst
evaluation, one has an ID of 10 mm without a thermocouple jacket,
and the other has an ID of 12 mm with a thermocouple jacket
whose outside diameter is 3 mm. The reaction data derived from
the two reactors were proved to be reproducible. Catalyst of 3 g
was charged into the reactor, and the space above the catalyst
bed was filled with quartz chips to preheat the in-coming liquid.
Before feedstock introduction, the sample was heated up in a flow
4
24.2°, 28.5°, etc.) are typical of the d-VOPO phase (PDF #47-
0951), corresponding to the (0 0 2), (1 1 1), (0 1 2), and (0 2 0)
plane, respectively [60]. Similarly, the diffraction lines (at
2h = 18.1°, 22.7°, 23.2°, 25.4°, etc.) presented in Fig. 1b are typical
of the
4
c-VOPO phase (PDF #47-0950), corresponding to the
(0 3 1), (2 2 1), (0 4 0), and (2 3 0) plane, respectively [60]. The
of N
2
(30 mL/min) to a desired temperature at a rate of 10 °C/min
diffraction lines (at 2h = 23.0°, 28.4°, 29.9°, etc.) in Fig. 1c are typ-
and kept at this temperature for 2.5 h. When a mixed solution of
acetic acid and formaldehyde (2.5/1, n/n) was fed, a mixture of
ical of the (VO)
(2 0 0), (0 2 4), and (0 3 2) plane, respectively [18]. The observa-
tions indicate that nearly pure d-VOPO -VOPO , and (VO)
entities are obtainable when the precursors are activated under
the conditions of pure O (40 mL/min) at 400 °C, 75 vol% O /N
2 2 7
P O phase (PDF #50-0380), corresponding to the
N
2
and air was served as carrier gas. The liquid feed rate was
.33–6.65 mL/h (formaldehyde feed rate, 6.1–30.5 mmol/h). Under
the reaction conditions, each component (acetic acid, formalde-
hyde, N , and O ) exists in gaseous state and its feed concentration
is indicated in vol% (mol%) together with the total gas hourly space
4
,
c
4
2 2 7
P O
1
2
2
2
2
2
(60 mL/min) at 680 °C, and 1.5 vol% n-butane/air (90 mL/min) at
400 °C, respectively. In addition, as shown in Fig. S1a, when the
À1
À1
velocity (h ). Typically, the GHSV of 1496 h and feed composi-
tion of 15.3/6.1/17.3/2.2/71.5 (molar fraction) was employed. The
products were collected in a cold trap. After 2.5-h reaction, the col-
lected liquid phase was analyzed using a gas chromatograph
equipped with a flame ion detector (FID) and a HP-FFAP capillary
column (0.32 mm  25 m). Valeric acid and iso-butyl alcohol were
used as internal standards for component quantification. All the
catalysts were first evaluated by screening their performances in
terms of the (AA + MA) yield in the collected liquid sample based
on formaldehyde input. Further evaluations were made on a few
representative catalysts. In these circumstances, the off-gas was
on-line analyzed by a GC equipped with TCD and TDX-01 packed
column. It is worth noting that the formaldehyde component can-
not be measured by GC analysis, therefore, the formaldehyde con-
version cannot be directly determined by using the GC analysis
data. In some cases, the unreacted HCHO content was analyzed
by the iodometry method, to directly determine the HCHO conver-
sion. Yield value is usually dependent upon a few parameters such
as catalyst amount, concentration of reactants, gas hourly space
velocity (GHSV), and time on stream (TOS). In order to minimize
the influence of these parameters in comparison of catalyst activ-
ity, we generally reported the formation rate(s) for the desired pro-
duct(s), namely, the amount of product(s) (in mmoles) generated
on per unit mass of catalyst per hour.
precursor is activated under pure O
new diffraction peak (2h = 11.9°) appears and could be ascribed
to the (0 0 1) plane of VOPO O phase (PDF #36-1472). The
Á2H
oxygen rich atmosphere favors the combination of -VOPO and
O to generate VOPO O. On the other hand, as shown in
Á2H
Fig. S1b, when the precursor is activated under 75 vol% O /N
(40 mL/min) at 400 °C, a diffraction peak at 2h = 23.0° is observed,
corresponding to the (2 0 0) plane of the (VO) phase (PDF
2
(60 mL/min) at 680 °C, a
4
2
c
4
H
2
4
2
2
2
2 2 7
P O
#50-0380). In this case the oxygen concentration in the activation
atmosphere is not high enough to fully oxidize the V4+ species. As
demonstrated in Fig. S1c and d, when the precursor is activated
under pure N
phase (PDF #50-0380 and 53-1051). Clearly, when the precur-
sor is activated under an oxygen-free atmosphere, it is usually
transformed into the (VO) phase no matter when activated
2 2 2
, all the diffraction lines correspond to the (VO) P -
O
7
2 2 7
P O
at 400 °C or 680 °C. When the activation atmosphere becomes
oxygen-rich, the sample activated at 400 °C would comprise a high
fraction of d-VOPO
oxygen, the essentially pure d-VOPO
-VOPO entity is obtainable when the precursor is activated under
an atmosphere of 75 vol% O
When the pure d-VOPO
4
phase. If the precursor is activated in the pure
4
entity is obtained. The pure
c
4
2
/N
2
at a higher temperature of 680 °C.
, and (VO) entities are
4
,
c-VOPO
4
2 2 7
P O
mixed with each other in certain ratios and subjected to mechan-
ical ball milling or simple stirring, no additional diffraction lines