Dipyrrylmethenes and their oxa and thia analogs
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 52, No. 8, August, 2003
1811
is indicative of nonequivalence of the αꢀ and βꢀpositions
in the pyrrole moieties, involved in the common conjugaꢀ
tion system of dipyrrylmethene.
shift of the first absorption band, which is indeed obꢀ
served experimentally.
It is assumed10 that the change in solvation of the
excited state makes the major contribution to the changes
in the electronic spectrum. Comparison of positions of
the first absorption bands in the nonꢀpolar solvent and in
polar solvents (see Table 4) shows that, depending on the
structure of the dipyrrolylmethene molecule, transition to
the excited state is almost without exception accompaꢀ
nied by a decrease in the dipole moment of its πꢀelectron
cloud. Dissolution of dipyrrylmethene hydrobromides in
protonꢀacceptor solvents (pyridine, DMF) is accompaꢀ
nied by elimination of HBr molecule. As a result, the
electronic spectra observed are characteristic of free
dipyrrylmethene bases.11
The presence of methyl group at the N atom in molꢀ
ecule 7 has virtually no effect on the energy of absorbed
light quantum. At the same time it causes a significant
decrease in the absorption probability, thus indicating that
the charge of H+ is still delocalized over the Nꢀmethylꢀ
substituted dipyrrylmethene. Replacement of the heteroꢀ
atom (nitrogen) in one pyrrole moiety by oxygen or sulfur
atoms (compounds 8 and 9, respectively) causes a shift of
the maximum of the absorption band by 40 nm toward the
boundary of the visible region compared to dipyrrylꢀ
methene 6 and a strong decrease in the band intensity. So
significant changes in the EAS are likely due to a decrease
in the extent of delocalization of the positive charge over
these atoms.
Thus, the absorption band in the EAS experiences a
bathochromic shift as the number of methyl groups inꢀ
creases in the order 6 < 7, 5, 4 < 1. Replacement of the
H atom by a methyl group at the nitrogen atom in one
pyrrole ring causes a larger shift of the absorption band as
compared to the effect of methyl substituent at the C atom.
Replacement of the pyrrole ring by the furan or thiophene
ring weakens the chromophore properties. Weakening of
πꢀconjugation in these compounds is likely due to elecꢀ
tronic rather than steric factors.
Analysis of the EAS recorded in DMF and pyridine
revealed a characteristic feature of dipyrrylmethene bases
and their analogs, namely, a marked solvatochromic efꢀ
fect even in the electronꢀdonor solvents of similar nature.
In pyridine solutions, the absorption bands experience a
bathochromic shift as compared to DMF, which is probꢀ
ably due to π,π*ꢀsolvation interactions between dipyrrylꢀ
methenes and their analogs and πꢀdeficient pyridine.
By and large, positions of absorption bands in the EAS
of compounds 1—11 depend on the molecular structure
in a complex manner due to superimposition of the elecꢀ
tronic and steric effects of functional substituents and to
the effect of the nature of the heteroatom. This requires
further investigations.
Our study of changes in the molal solution enthalꢀ
pies, ∆solHm = f(m), of compounds 1—11 showed that,
within the limits of experimental error, the ∆solHm valꢀ
ues are independent of the solute concentration (all
compounds possess the properties of very weak electroꢀ
lytes in the chosen range of operating concentrations,
10–5—10–4 mol kg–1 12).
In the α,αꢀ, α,βꢀ, and β,βꢀisomers, the effect of plaꢀ
narity distortion of dipyrrylmethene molecules (estimated
by calculations) changes as follows: 1 < 10 < 11. This
structural distortion has little effect on the position of the
spectral band (hypsochromic shift is only ∼10 nm) but
strongly affects the absorption probability, which subꢀ
stantially decreases (see Table 1). Besides, the absorption
band is broadened (probably, due to activation of vibraꢀ
tional states).
An analogous, though less pronounced, effect is obꢀ
served in the case of Nꢀmethyl substitution in dipyrrylꢀ
methene 7. Here, the absorption band experiences a
bathochromic shift relative to dipyrrylmethene 6 and its
intensity substantially decreases, which is probably due to
steric hindrances produced by the methyl group at the
nitrogen atom.
No less specific is the effect of the solvent nature on
the EAS of compounds studied (see Table 4). A characꢀ
teristic feature of the EAS of hydrobromides is the presꢀ
ence of two absorption bands. The first, longꢀwavelength,
band is intense while the second band is weak and, as a
rule, disappears in the protonꢀacceptor solvents (DMF,
pyridine) responsible for (this is our hypothesis) eliminaꢀ
tion and solvation of HBr molecule. The lastꢀmentioned
process must cause a decrease in the polarity of the
dipyrrylmethene molecule, weakening of its interaction
with the solvent and, as a consequence, a hypsochromic
Since compounds 4, 8, 10, and 11 are virtually inꢀ
soluble in benzene, we calculated the enthalpies of transꢀ
fer (∆trH°) from 1ꢀpropanol (see Table 3). The results
obtained show a strong dependence of the change in the
enthalpy of the solute—solvent interaction on the strucꢀ
ture, up to insolubility of some compounds in benzene
(see above). Apparently, a nearly 100% insolubility of
dipyrrylmethenes 10 and 11 in benzene is due to distorꢀ
tion of planarity in the molecules of these compounds. As
a result, the π—πꢀsolvation interactions between benzene
and dipyrrylmethene become sterically hindered by subꢀ
stituents.
Propanol possesses the weakest solvation properties
toward most of the compounds studied; therefore, the
corresponding solution enthalpies have the largest posiꢀ
tive values. Among methylꢀsubstituted dipyrrylmethenes
(1 and 4—7), the largest and smallest effective molecular
volumes have hexamethylꢀsubstituted dipyrrylmethene 1