entries 12–15; Fig. 1). Sterically more demanding anhydrides
experienced slower kinetics during the course of the reaction. The
relative reactivity of anhydrides 4–6, tested in the Zn–1-catalyzed
acylation of Ch, were as follows: 4 : 6 : 5 = 15 : 2 : 1.{
In summary, metal complex-modified cavitands are supramo-
lecular catalysts for the synthesis of biologically-relevant ACh from
Ch and 4. Their ability to discriminate and accelerate the
esterification of choline has been demonstrated. Additionally, the
activity and selectivity of the metal catalyst is unequivocally
enhanced when the metal complex is well positioned at the
periphery of the binding pocket.
Table 1 Acetylation of choline Ch and triethylcholine TCh in the
presence of acetic anhydridea
Catalyst
Entry (Quantity)/mol% Substrate kob/6 1024 min21 kob/kuncat
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
—
Ch
Ch
Ch
Ch
Ch
Ch
TCh
TCh
Ch
0.1
32
46
72
190
14
11
32
1
Zn–1 (0.4)
Zn–1 (0.6)
Zn–1 (1.0)
Zn–1 (2.0)
Zn–2 (2.0)
Zn–2 (2.0)
Zn–1 (2.0)
3 (2.0)
320
460
720
1900
140
110
320
—
—
We are grateful to the Skaggs Foundation and the National
Institute of Health (GM 27932) for financial support, to Dr. Laura
B. Pasternack for advice with the 1H-NMR experiments, and
Sebastien Richeter for a sample of Zn–1. We thank the DFG for a
postdoctoral fellowship to F. H. Z.
10
11
12
13
14
15
a
Zn–2/3 (2.0)
Zn–2/3 (2.0)
DMAP (2.0)
DMAP (2.0)
DMAP/3 (2.0)
DMAP/3 (2.0)
Ch
TCh
Ch
TCh
Ch
TCh
8
11
180
200
140
170
80
110
1800
2000
1400
1700
Conditions: Ch, TCh (50 mM), 4 (50 mM); DMSO-d6, 25 ¡ 2 uC.
Detection method: Error limit: 20%.
1H-NMR.
rate
rate(entry 1)
Notes and references
b
kob
~
; kuncat~
{ As an undesired side reaction, hydrolysis of the anhydride occurred from
residual water (6–11% after ca. 100 min).
½Chꢀ
½Chꢀ
§ The signals of the host are strongly broadened by dynamic effects,
probably involving exchange equilibration with the alternative ‘‘kite’’
conformation. Therefore, the binding constant was calculated only from
the trimethylammonium ‘‘knob’’ signals of the guests (Dd = 3.6 ppm). This
precludes the accurate determination of the binding constant.
1 (a) E. Vedejs and X. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 1809–1810; (b)
E. Vedejs, O. Daugulis, J. A. MacKay and E. Rozners, Synlett, 2001,
1499–1505; (c) J. C. Ruble, J. Tweddell and G. C. Fu, J. Org. Chem.,
1998, 63, 2794–2795; (d) J. C. Ruble, H. A. Latham and G. C. Fu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 1492–1493; (e) B. M. Trost and T. Mito, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 2410–2411.
Fig. 2 Selectivity (S) of the acylation of Ch vs. TCh (kob(Ch)/kob(TCh)).
2 (a) N. C. Gianneschi, S. T. Nguyen and C. A. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 1644–1645; (b) L. G. Mackay, R. S. Wylie and J. K.
M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 3141–3142.
3 (a) D. J. Cram, Science, 1983, 219, 1177–1183; (b) E. Dalcanale,
P. Soncini, G. Bacchilega and F. Ugozzoli, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1989, 500–502; (c) P. Soncini, S. Bonsignore, E. Dalcanale and
F. Ugozzoli, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 4608–4612; (d) J. L. Atwood and
A. Szumna, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 10646–10647; (e) P. Ballester,
A. Shivanyuk, A. R. Far and J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
14014–14016.
4 S. Richeter and J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
16280–16281.
5 (a) F. Cuevas, S. Di Stefano, J. O. Magrans, P. Prados, L. Mandolini and
J. de Mendoza, Chem.–Eur. J., 2000, 6, 3228–3234; (b) A. Gissot and
J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 7424–7425.
selectivity (S) (kob(Ch)/kob(TCh)) is observed with the metal complex
Zn–2 (Table 1, entries 6 and 7; Fig. 2).
We assume that weak binding of Ch and ACh within Zn–1 (Ka =
10 and 20 M21, respectively){§ is responsible, since product
inhibition has not been observed.{ In contrast to Ch, the bulkier
TCh showed no inclusion within the cavity.
The Zn–1-templated acylation of Ch with 4 is in the range of the
same reaction catalyzed by dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), one
of the best organic acylation catalysts. DMAP, or the combination
of DMAP with cavitand 3, showed, as expected, no selectivity
between the electronically equivalent guests Ch and TCh (Table 1,
754 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 753–754
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006