to isolate 0.5 mmol each of 1-amino-6-nitropyrene and
1-amino-8-nitropyrene. A major advantage of this synthetic
strategy is that it circumvents the selective reduction problem
of the dinitro compounds.
Each purified isomer of aminonitropyrene was oxidized
to nitrosonitropyrene using m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid. The
nitrosonitropyrene was converted to the N-hydroxy derivative
in situ in the presence of ascorbic acid, which was allowed
to react with the self-complementary decamer, 5′-d(AAAT-
GCATTT), in DMF-H2O (1:9), pH 5.0-5.5 for 16-20 h
at ambient temperature. HPLC analysis of the reaction
mixture showed that the adducted decamer eluted more
slowly than the unmodified oligonucleotide on a reverse-
phase column (Figure 2) and that the typical yields were
Figure 3. The 32P-labeled samples were run on a 84 cm long 20%
polyacrylamide gel for 26 h at 2500 V: lane 1, 5′-AAATGCATTT-
3′; lane 2, 5′-AAATG1,6-ANPCATTT-3′; lane 3, 5′-AAATG1,8-ANP
CATTT-3′.
-
reaction has been shown to cleave DNA at the sites of C8-
or N7-alkylated guanines, similar to the Maxam-Gilbert G
reaction.12 Indeed, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the
piperidine-treated modified decamers (lanes 5 and 7) showed
a band parallel to the Maxam-Gilbert G reaction (lane 3)
of the unmodified decamer (Figure 4). HPLC analysis of
Figure 4. The 32P-labeled samples were run on a 20% polyacyl-
amide gel for 2.5 h at 1800 V: 1, control 10mer; 2, control 10mer
treated with piperidine (no DMS); 3, control 10mer treated with
DMS followed by piperidine; 4, 10mer with 1,8-ANP adduct; 5,
10mer with 1,8-ANP adduct treated with piperidine; 6, 10mer with
1,6-ANP adduct; 7, 10mer with 1,6-ANP adduct treated with
piperidine; 8, 10mer with 1-AP adduct; 9, 10mer with 1-AP adduct
treated with piperidine.
Figure 2. Reverse-phase HPLC chromatograms of oligonucleo-
tides: (A) unreacted 10mer with the absorption spectrum in the
inset; (B) crude reaction mixture of 10mer with N-hydroxy-1-amino-
6-nitropyrene; absorption spectrum of the slower eluting adducted
oligonucleotide is shown in the inset; (C) crude reaction of 10mer
with N-hydroxy-1-amino-8-nitropyrene; absorption spectrum of the
slower eluting adducted oligonucleotide is shown in the inset.
the enzymatically digested adducted decamers revealed the
absence of dG as well as the presence of a late-eluting peak
that cochromatographed with an authentic sample of dG1,6-ANP
(5) (a) Imaida, K.; Lee, M.-S.; Land, S. J.; Wang, C. Y.; King, C. M.
Carcinogenesis 1995, 16, 3027. (b) Smith, B. A.; Manjanatha, M. G.;
Pogribny, I. P.; Mittelstaedt, R. A.; Chen, T.; Fullerton, N. F.; Beland, F.
A.; Helfich, R. H. Mutat. Res. 1997, 379, 61.
10-15% for both the 1,6- and 1,8-isomers. As shown in
Figure 3, the modified decamers have a slower mobility than
the unmodified decamer in polyacrylamide gel electrophore-
sis. The site of adduction was established by treatment of
the modified decamer with piperidine at 90 °C for 1 h. This
(6) (a) Stanton, C. A.; Chow, F. L.; Philips, D. H.; Grover, P. L.; Garner,
R. C.; Martin, C. N. Carcinogenesis 1985, 6, 535. (b) Andrews, P. J.;
Quilliam, M. A.; McCarry, B. E.; Bryant, D. W.; McCalla, D. R.
Carcinogenesis 1986, 7, 105. (c) Djuric, Z.; Fifer, E. K.; Yamazoe, Y.;
Beland, F. A. Carcinogenesis 1988, 9, 357.
(7) (a) Malia, S. A.; Vyas, R. R.; Basu, A. K. Biochemistry 1996, 35,
4568. (b) Gu, Z.; Gorin, A.; Krishnasamy, R.; Hingerty, B. E.; Basu, A.
K.; Broyde, S.; Patel, D. J. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 10843. (c) Nolan, S. J.;
McNulty, J. M.; Krishnasamy, R.; McGregor, W. G.; Basu, A. K.
Biochemistry 1999, 38, 14056.
(4) (a) Cole, J.; Arlett, C. F.; Lowe, J.; Bridges, B. A. Mutat. Res. 1982,
93, 213. (b) Boldt, J.; Mah, M. C.-M.; Wang, Y.-C.; Smith, B. A.; Beland,
F. A.; Maher, V. M.; McCormick, J. J. Carcinogenesis 1991, 12, 119. (c)
Silvers, K. J.; Eddy, E. P.; McCoy, E. C.; Rosenkranz, H. S.; Howard, P.
C. EnViron. Health Perspect. 1994, 102 (Suppl. 6), 195.
(8) (a) Guengerich, F. P.; Mundkowski, R. G.; Voehler, M.; Kadlubar,
F. F. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1999, 12, 906. (b) Humphreys, W. G.; Kadlubar,
F. F.; Guengerich, F. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89, 8278.
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 13, 2000
1873