Fluorescent Detection of Thymidine Nucleotides
COMMUNICATION
ꢀ
excess of triphosphate, Cl , TDP, TMP, T, PPi and GTP
added to the Zn-CydiPy/TTP host–guest complex. Displace-
ment of TTP from the host–guest complex would be expect-
ed to significantly decrease the excimer emission intensity
but these decreases were small (compare entries 1–5 with
entry 6 for TTP only in Figure 3). The greatest decrease
(
10%) was observed for TDP. The results are consistent
with the binding constants (vide supra), supporting the bind-
ing order: TTP> TDP ꢃTMP. Importantly, the Zn-CydiPy
receptor shows some selectivity for TTP over the other
binding agents.
The potential hydrolysis of thymidine nucleotides needs
II
to be considered as Zn –cyclen complexes can cleave the
[11]
phosphodiester bonds in DNA/RNA sequences. It is also
possible for the ester bonds in the receptor to hydrolyze. A
test of fluorescence stability for a solution containing a 1:1
Figure 2. Change in fluorescence emission spectra of Zn-CydiPy (5.0 mm,
excitation at 350 nm) upon addition of TTP (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.7, 1.0,
ratio of Zn-CydiPy and TTP in CH CN/HEPES (1:9) buffer
3
(
10.0 mm, pH 7.4, T=20.08C) showed negligible change
1
.5, 2.5 and 4.0 equiv) in CH
3
CN/HEPES (1:9) buffer solution (10.0 mm,
over a 48 h period (see Figure S4 in the Supporting Informa-
tion).
pH 7.4, T=20.08C).
To account for the enhanced excimer emission in the pres-
ence of the thymidine nucleotides, we propose, as in previ-
ous studies, that these guests bind to Zn via a deprotonat-
F and F are the fluorescence intensities in the absence
0
[7]
II
and presence of the guest, F is the maximum fluorescence
b
intensity.
ed thymine (imide), forming a ZnꢀN bond; this binding
Given that TTP binds more strongly to the Zn-CydiPy re-
ceptor than the other DNA bases and corresponding nucleo-
tides, competition experiments were undertaken to explore
the selectivity of the receptor for TTP. Figure 3 plots the
change in excimer emission intensity relative to that of Zn-
CydiPy; for comparison, the fluorescence enhancement
caused by each guest molecule is included (entries up to
TTP). The top seven entries in Figure 3 show the excimer
emission intensity measured for solutions with a 10-fold
being strengthened by H-bonding (Scheme 2). Interactions
at multiple levels act cooperatively to lock the host–guest
complex into a conformation that brings the pyrene unit
into close proximity leading to strong excimer emission
[13,14]
(static) and quenching monomer emission.
The other
guests studied either do not bind to Zn-CydiPy or, if they
do, they do not promote pyrene–pyrene interactions. For
these guests, the weak excimer emission (dynamic) could be
indicating that, on average, a small fraction of the pyrene
units on the same or different
receptor molecules maybe in-
teracting.
For TMP, TDP and TTP, we
postulate that, at the pH used
in this study (7.4), hydrogen
bonding between the anionic
phosphates and the protonated
pendant amines linking the pyr-
enes to the macrocycle in Zn-
CydiPy (Scheme 2) cause the
enhancement in excimer emis-
sion by bringing these units in
close proximity. Indeed, exci-
mer emission from the 1:1 Zn-
CydiPy:TTP adduct, measured
in the pH range 6.5 to 11.3 (see
Figure S5 in the Supporting In-
formation), substantially de-
creases in the pH range 8–9
Figure 3. Fluorescence change ((FꢀF
0 0
)/F ) at 470 nm for Zn-CydiPy (5.0 mm, excitation at 350 nm) on addition
of 5.0 mm of Cl , F , Pi, PPi, triphosphate, A, G, C, T, AMP, GMP, CMP, TMP, ADP, GDP, CDP, TDP, ATP,
GTP, CTP, TTP; and a mixture of 50.0 mm PPi, GTP, T, TMP, TDP, chloride, triphosphate and 5.0 mm TTP in
(
pK 8.6) confirming the impor-
a
ꢀ
ꢀ
tance of protonation of the
pendant amines in bringing
about this emission.
CH
3 0
CN/HEPES (1:9) buffer solution (10.0 mm, pH 7.4, T=20.08C). F and F are the fluorescence intensities
in the absence and presence of the guest, respectively. The value for Zn-CydiPy is normalised to zero.
Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 12941 – 12944
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
12943