aligned with the oxazolone ring oxygen and is more deshielded
(Fig. 2) compared to the Z isomer which is aligned with the
imine nitrogen. These observations were further supported by
two X-ray crystal structures of 5b and 6a¶ (Fig. 3). Although
interconversion of the E and Z double bond is possible, this was
not observed for the monophenyl pseudoxazolones. Assay of 5a
and 5b against HAV 3C proteinase gives time dependent
inhibition with IC50 of 6 mM and 4 mM, respectively. However,
compounds 6a and 6b display different levels of inhibition. The
E isomer 6a is a time dependent inhibitor with an IC50 of 26 mM.
However, the Z isomer 6b displays weaker inhibition, with an
IC50 > 100 mM, indicating that the enzyme has a selectivity for
the E over the Z isomer when there is substitution at the imine
carbon. Other derivatives with different substitution at the imine
position (data not shown) display the same type of behaviour.
This is possibly due to some unfavourable electronic interaction
of the phenyl group of 6b in the active site of the enzyme.
Assays of these pseudoxazolones against HRV 3C proteinase
(Table 1) also show the same pattern of inhibition as that
observed for the HAV 3C enzyme. Although the inhibition
levels are weaker for the HRV 3C proteinase, it should be noted
that the amount of enzyme used in the HRV assay (0.4 mM) is
more than that for HAV (0.1 mM) because of the limitations of
the UV assay used for the former.
versity of Alberta) for enzyme preparation and helpful sugges-
tions. We are grateful to Dr Robert McDonald for crystallo-
graphic analyses. These investigations were supported by the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
(scholarship to N. I. M.; summer studentship to L. S.) and the
Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (scholarship
to Y. K. R.).
Notes and references
§ Enzyme inhibition studies for HAV 3C employed a recombinant C24S
mutant in which a non-catalytic external cysteine (Cys24) was replaced by
serine and which displays catalytic properties indistinguishable from the
wild type enzyme. For an ideal peptide substrate mimicking the 2B/2C
junction of the large precursor polyprotein with glutamine preferred at the
P1 residue: the kcat of this enzyme is about 1.8 s21 with a Km of 2.1 mM at
pH 7.5.4 HRV 3C assays used the 3C proteinase from serotype 14.7a
¶ Crystal data for 5b: C10H7NO2: M = 173.17, triclinic, a = 5.5390(6), b
= 7.2645(8), c = 10.4291(11) Å, a = 83.673(2), b = 83.789(2), g =
¯
80.624(8)°, U = 409.77(8) Å3, T = 193 K, space group P1 (No. 2), Z = 2,
m(Mo-Ka) = 0.100 mm21, 2179 reflections measured, 1641 unique (Rint
=
0.0164) which were used in all least square calculations, R1(F) = 0.0374
2
(for 1365 reflections with Fo ! 2s(Fo2)), wR2(F2) = 0.1037 (for all unique
relections).
Crystal data for 6a: C11H9NO2: M = 187.19, triclinic, a = 6.0008(8), b
In summary, we have shown that pseudoxazolones are potent
inhibitors of HAV and HRV 3C enzymes with micromolar IC50
values in the range. Although the monophenyl pseudoxazolones
of glycine 5a and 5b show comparable inhibition, this is not the
case with the alanine derivatives, indicating that the enzymes
have selectivity for the E 6a over the Z isomer 6b. X-Ray crystal
structures of 5b and 6a have helped to assign the geometrical
configuration of the monophenyl pseudoxazolone analogues.
The inhibition data and mass spectrometry suggest that the
enzyme forms a covalent bond with the inhibitors. Further
mechanistic studies involving 13C labelled analogues and
pseudoxazolones with other substitution patterns are in pro-
gress. The use of pseudoxazolones for inhibition of other
cysteine proteinases is also being explored.
= 7.2370(11), c = 10.9282(16) Å, a = 95.403(2), b = 101.029(3), g =
¯
102.046(3)°, U = 451.10(11) Å3, T = 193 K, space group P1 (No. 2), Z =
2, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.096 mm21, 2409 reflections measured, 1827 unique (Rint
= 0.0422) which were used in all least square calculations, R1(F) = 0.0449
2
(for 1207 reflections with Fo ! 2s(Fo2)), wR(F2) = 0.1113 for all unique
relections).
b109095j/ for crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format.
1 For reviews on cysteine proteinases and their inhibitors, see: H.-H. Otto
and T. Schirmeister, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 133–171; (b) D. Leung, G.
Abbenante and D. P. Fairlie, J. Med. Chem., 2000, 43, 305–341; (c) see
also the Symposium-in-Print on cysteine protease inhibitors: S. K.
Thompson, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1999, 7, 571.
2 F. B. Hollinger and J. R. Ticehurst, in Fields Virology, ed. B. N. Fields,
D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, R. M. Channock, J. L. Melnick, T. P.
Monath, B. E. Roizmann and S. E. Strauss, Lippincott-Raven Pub-
lishers, Philadelphia, 1996.
We thank Drs Bruce Malcolm (Schering Plough), Ernst
Bergmann and Craig Garen (Biochemistry Department, Uni-
3 E. M. Bergmann and M. N. G. James, in Proteases as Targets for
Therapy, ed. K. Von der Helm and B. Korant, Springer, Heiderlberg,
1999.
4 B. A. Malcolm, Protein Sci., 1995, 4, 1439–1445 and references
therein.
5 (a) E. M. Bergmann, S. C. Mosimann, M. M. Chernaia, B. A. Malcolm
and M. N. G. James, J. Virol., 1997, 71, 2436–2448; (b) for crystal
structure of HAV 3C with N-iodoacetyl-Val-Phe-NH2, see: E. M.
Bergmann, M. M. Cherney, J. McKendrick, S. Frormann, C. Luo, B. A.
Malcolm, J. C. Vederas and M. N. G. James, Virology, 1999, 265,
153–163.
Fig. 2 1H Chemical shift of the glycine pseudoxazolone olefinic proton in
acetone-d6 (300 MHz).
6 D. A. Matthews, W. W. Smith, R. A. Ferre, B. Condon, G. Budahazi, W.
Sisson, J. E. Villafranca, C. A. Janson, H. E. McElroy, C. L. Gribskov
and S. Worland, Cell, 1994, 77, 761–771.
7 (a) R. D. Hill and J. C. Vederas, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 9538–9546;
(b) M. S. Lall, C. Karvellas and J. C. Vederas, Org. Lett., 1999, 1,
803–806; (c) B. A. Malcolm, C. Lowe, S. Shechosky, R. T. McKay, C.
C. Yang, V. J. Shah, R. J. Simon, J. C. Vederas and D. V. Santi,
Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 8172–8174 and references therein.
8 (a) S. H. Reich, T. Johnson, M. B. Wallace, S. E. Kephart, S. A.
Fuhrman, S. T. Worland, D. A. Matthews T. F. Hendrickson, F. Chan,
J. Meadow III, R. A. Ferre, E. L. Brown, D. M. Delisle, A. K. Patick, S.
L. Binford and C. E. Ford, J. Med. Chem., 2000, 43, 1670–1683 and
references therein; (b) S. Venkatraman, J. Kong, S. Nimkar, Q. M.
Wang, J. Aubé and R. P. Hanzlik, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9,
577–580 and references therein.
9 (a) A. Kaneda and R. Sudo, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1970, 43, 2159–2161;
(b) I. L. Knunyants, O. V. Kil’disheva, M. P. Krasuskaya, M. G.
Lin’kova, V. V. Shokina, Z. V. Benevolenskaya and L. P. Rasteikene,
Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. (Engl. Trans.), 1959,
1702–1710.
10 (a) Y. Iwakura, F. Toda, M. Kosugi and Y. Torii, J. Org. Chem., 1971,
36, 3990–3992; (b) J. A. King and F. H. McMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1950, 72, 833–836; (c) J. W. Cornforth, in The Chemistry of Penicillin,
ed. H. T. Clarke, J. R. Johnson and R. Robinson, Princeton University
Press, Princeton, NJ, 1949, pp. 688, 739, 793.
Fig. 3 Crystal structure of 5b (top) and 6a (bottom).
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2740–2741
2741