C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3. Possible Reactions Involved in Acetaldehyde
Formation
inhibited the reaction and such a step has a ∆Gr ) 12 kcal/mol;
other coupling reactions are driven by water formation. (iv) The
most likely scenario for acetaldehyde formation is the oxidation of
methane to formaldehyde via methanol, followed by its coupling
with methane to yield the product, possibly occurring entirely in
the coordination sphere of the catalyst (Scheme 3c). Accumulation
of HCHO and then CO leads to deactivation (high concentrations
of these inhibit the reaction).
The presence of the polyoxometalate in the [Pt(Mebipym)-
Cl2]+[H4PV2Mo10O40]- hybrid catalyst is key in enabling mild
aerobic oxidation of methane and possibly functions to facilitate
both (a) oxidation of Pt(II) to Pt(IV) intermediates and (b) the
addition of methane (also methanol) to a Pt(II) center by providing
a conduit for improved oxidation of intermediate hydride species.
after the reaction showed no formation of Pt aggregates due to
reduction of the Pt complex. ICP-MS analysis also gave no
indication of leaching of Pt into the solution. An active carbon
support instead of a silica matrix was equally effective; hydrophobic
silica was an inferior support. Simple Pt compounds such as cis-
Pt(II)(NH3)2Cl2 and K2PtCl4 showed no catalytic activity.
A key feature of a Shilov-type catalytic cycle is the formation
of methanol via a nucleophilic cleavage of a Pt(IV)-methyl
intermediate (Scheme 1, step 3), rather than a direct oxidation of
an intermediate with O2. Three experiments were carried out that
support a nucleophilic cleavage pathway. (i) Oxidation of methane
in the presence of HCl yielded 63 µmol of CH3Cl, 11 µmol of
CH3OH, 2 µmol of HCHO, and 62 µmol of CH3CHO (48 TON).11
(ii) A reaction in the presence of 18O-labeled water gave 18O-labeled
CH3OH, HCHO, and CH3CHO (∼73 ( 3% enrichment).12 Enrich-
ment is reduced due to exchange of H218O with the acid. (iii)
Reaction in the presence of 18O-labeled O2 (96.3% enrichment)
under standard reaction conditions (Table 1) yielded no 18O-labeled
products. Methyl chloride formation in the presence of HCl and
the 18O-labeling experiments support a nucleophilic cleavage
pathway.13
The significant formation of acetaldehyde is a novel feature of
this reaction. A time course profile (Figure 1S) of the reaction
showed no induction period; methanol and acetaldehyde were
accumulated immediately. The accumulation of formaldehyde was
delayed and coincided with the inhibition of the reaction. Also,
the oxidation of methane upon addition of 250 µmol of formalde-
hyde (conditions given in Table 1) was almost totally inhibited.
Conceivable reactions to consider for acetaldehyde formation are
outlined in Scheme 3. To gain further insight into these possibilities,
various additional experiments were carried out. (i) A reaction with
CH4/13CH3OH gave labeled CH313CHO only at the carbonyl
position,14 but mostly unlabeled product was formed (CH3CHO/
CH313CHO ∼3/1). (ii) In the absence of methane, the oxidation of
methanol to formaldehyde was very slow (Figure 2S); neither the
polyoxometalate nor the [Pt(Mebipym)Cl2]+ ligand alone showed
activity for alcohol oxidation. (iii) Similarly, the oxidation of ethanol
was also slow (Figure 2S). (iv) Addition of a small amount of 13CO
to a methane oxidation reaction showed no formation of CH313CHO,
and only traces of CH3OH (∼1 TON), but no CH312CHO was
observed.15
Acknowledgment. The research was supported by Israel
Science Foundation and the Minerva Foundation. R.N. is the
Rebecca and Israel Sieff Professor of Organic Chemistry.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, NMR
spectra of the [Pt(Mebipym)Cl2]+ ligand, and time course profiles for
oxidations. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) Baik M.-H.; Newcomb M.; Friesner, R. A.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. ReV.
2003, 103, 2385-2419.
(2) Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E. Nature 2002, 417, 507-514.
(3) Shilov, A. E.; Shulpin, G. B. Russ. Chem. ReV. 1987, 56, 442-464.
(4) (a) Periana, R. A.; Taube, D. J.; Gamble, S.; Taube, H.; Satoh, T.; Fujii,
H. Science 1998, 280, 560-564. (b) Muehlhoefer, M.; Strassner, T.;
Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1745-1747. (c) Lin,
M.; Shen, C.; Garcia-Zaya, E. A.; Sen, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
1000-1001. (d) Geletii, Y. V.; Shilov, A. E. Kinet. Catal. 1983, 24, 413-
416.
(5) Some papers and references therein: (a) Zhong, H. A.; Labinger, J. A.;
Bercaw, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1378-1398. (b) Labinger, J.
A.; Herring, A. M.; Lyon, D. K.; Luinstra, G. A.; Bercaw, J. E.; Horvath,
I. T.; Eller, K. Organometallics 1993, 12, 895-905. (c) Holtcamp, M.
W.; Henling, L. M.; Day, M. W.; Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E. Inorg.
Chim. Acta 1998, 270, 467-468. (d) Johansson, L.; Tilset, M.; Labinger,
J. A.; Bercaw, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10846-10855. (e)
Rostovstev, V. V.; Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E.; Lasseter, T. L.; Goldberg,
K. I. Organometallics 1998, 17, 4530-4531. (f) Scollard, J. D.; Day,
M.; Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 3247-
3268.
(6) Periana, R. A.; Mironov, O.; Taube, D.; Bhalla, G.; Jones, C. J. Science
2003, 301, 814-818.
(7) (a) Lin, M.; Sen, A. Nature 1994, 368, 613-615. (b) Nizova, G. V.;
Shulpin, G. B.; Su¨ss-Fink, G.; Stanislas, S. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1885-
1886. (c) Jia, C.; Kitamura, T.; Fujiwara, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34,
633-639.
(8) (a) Kozhevnikov, I. V. Catalysis by Polyoxometalates; Wiley: Chichester,
England, 2002. (b) Hill, C. L.; Prosser-McCartha, C. M. Coord. Chem.
ReV. 1995, 143, 407-455. (c) Okuhara, T.; Mizuno, N.; Misono, M. AdV.
Catal. 1996, 41, 113-252. (d) Neumann, R. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1998,
47, 317-370.
(9) Authentic hydride species are immediately oxidized by H5PV2Mo10O40
.
See also: (a) Katamura, K.; Nakamura, T.; Sakata, K.; Misono, M.;
Yoneda, Y. Chem. Lett. 1981, 89-92. (b) Mizuno, N.; Katamura, K.;
Yoneda, Y.; Misono, M. J. Catal. 1983, 83, 384-392.
(10) Neumann, R.; Levin, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7278-7286.
(11) Conditions: 2.9 µmol of catalyst, 300 µmol of HCl, 2 mL of H2O, 30 bar
CH4, 2 bar O2, 50 °C, 4 h. A control experiment showed no formation of
CH3Cl from CH3OH.
(12) Conditions: 0.29 µmol of catalyst, 0.2 mL of H218O (95.2% 18O), 50 µmol
of H2SO4, 30 bar CH4, 2 bar O2, 50 °C, 4 h. In a control experiment,
<1.5% exchange between CH3OH and CH318OH was observed.
(13) It is possible that a H-PtIV-CH3 intermediate is formed by oxidative
addition of CH4 to a PtII species. In such a scenario, the hydride may be
oxidized by the polyoxometalate (ref 9) along with the nucleophilic
cleavage step.
From the results described above, one can draw the following
conclusions. (i) Coupling of methanol and formaldehyde is not
likely (Scheme 3e) because addition of 13CH3OH to a reaction
yielded labeled acetaldehyde only at the carbonyl position. (ii) A
pathway involving oxidative coupling of coordinated methanol and
methane to yield ethanol that is then oxidized to acetaldehyde
(Scheme 3b) is also unlikely since ethanol is only slowly oxidized
under the reaction conditions and ethanol was not observed as an
intermediate. (iii) Formation of acetaldehyde by reaction of methane
with CO (Scheme 3d) is also improbable since CO strongly
(14) Conditions: 2.88 µmol of catalyst, 1 mmol of 13CH3OH (99% 13C),
2 mL of H2O, 60 µmol of H5PV2Mo10O40, 30 bar CH4, 2 bar O2, 50 °C,
4 h. TON ) 31.
(15) Conditions: 2.88 µmol of catalyst, 2 mL of H2O, 60 µmol of H5PV2-
Mo10O40, 30 bar CH4, 0.2 bar 13CO (CH4/CO ) 150), 2 bar O2, 50 °C,
4 h.
JA0493547
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 33, 2004 10237