8
the receptor by subsite-assisted binding. These approaches
have met with some success, yet there is still considerable
difficulty in discovery of high affinity ligands for carbohy-
drate receptors, as the monovalent epitopes tend to bind their
receptors weakly (millimolar range). Carbohydrates on cell
surfaces are displayed in clusters (or multivalent arrays), and
it is most likely that cooperative effects are responsible for
increasing the strength of binding of these ligands to their
Scheme 2
9
receptors and the resulting potency of these compounds.
Multivalent carbohydrates can also affect the nature of the
biological response that results.10 The development of
strategies for synthesis of multivalent (di-, tri- and higher
order) carbohydrate displays is required for the development
of therapeutics from carbohydrates and for providing com-
pounds, which are structurally well defined, for studies of
the mechanisms of action of these ligands.
isocyanoacetate gave the simple divalent galactose dimer 3.
The acetate groups can be removed using NaOMe/MeOH
without degradation of the product to give the homodimeric
glycoconjugate 4.
Multicomponent reactions such as the Ugi reaction (Scheme
1) have generated much interest because of their synthetic
The Ugi reaction of 1, formaldehyde, methyl isocyano-
acetate (2.0 equiv of each reagent), and terephthalic acid (1.0
equiv) gave the dimeric carbohydrate 5 (Scheme 3). The
acetates can again be removed to give 6.
Scheme 1
Scheme 3
potential, their utility in combinatorial chemistry, and for
11
the generation of molecular diversity. The potential of the
reaction in carbohydrate chemistry and biology has been
recognized by other researchers.12
We have decided to investigate synthetic routes to divalent
and higher order multivalent carbohydrates that will also
facilitate introduction of diversity. Divalent carbohydrates
13
can show improved biological activity, and therefore we
have initially investigated the suitability of the Ugi reaction
for convergent one-pot synthesis of dimeric carbohydrates.
Thus galactose amine 1 can be used to prepare conjugate
2
by condensation with succinic anhydride in the presence
of diisopropylethylamine in dichloromethane (56%, Scheme
). The Ugi reaction of 1, 2, formaldehyde, and methyl
2
Having prepared 4 and 6, we wanted to establish whether
there are any preferred solution structures because of the
potential relevance of conformation to the recognition of
(
7) Murphy, P. V.; Hubbard, R. E.; Manallack, D. T.; Wills, R. E.;
Montana, J. G.; Taylor, R. J. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998, 6, 2421.
8) Arya, P.; Kutterer, K. M. K.; Qin, H.; Roby, J.; Barnes, M. L.; Kim,
J. M.; Roy, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 1127.
9) (a) Kiessling, L. L.; Gestwicki, J. E.; Strong, L. E. Curr. Opin. Chem.
divalent and multivalent ligands in biological systems.14
A
(
number of carbohydrate derivatives 7-9 related to those
(
found in the divalent compounds were also prepared (Scheme
Biol. 2000, 4, 696. (b) Mammen, M.; Choi, S. K. Whitesides, G. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2755.
1
5
4) to aid the structural studies.
(
10) Gestwicki, J. E.; Strong, L. E.; Kiessling, L. L. Chem. Biol. 2000,
, 583.
11) Domling, A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 33168 and
references therein.
12) (a) Oertel, K.; Zech, G.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
9, 1431 and references therein. (b) Park, W. K. C.; Auer, M.; Jaksche, H.
NMR analyses of â-glycosyl amido derivatives have been
7
1
6,17
(
reported previously.
However, the conformation and
O has
configuration of the unprotected carbohydrates in D
2
(
3
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10150. (c) Sutherlin, D. P.; Stark, T. M.;
Armstrong, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8350. (d) Tsai, C.-Y.; Park, W.
K. C.; Weitz-Schmidt, G.; Ernst, B.; Wong, C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
(14) Roy, R. Das, S. K. Santoyo-Gonzalez, F. Hernandez-Mateo, F.; Dam,
T. K.; Brewer, C. F. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1757.
(15) Experimental protocols were as described previously; see: Retail-
leau, L.; Laplace, A.; Fensterbank, H.; Larpent, C. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 608;
(16) The R-glycosides have not been reported. Conventions for describing
the configurations and conformations of the â-derivatives have been
described previously; see: Avalos, M.; Babiano, R.; Dur aj n, C. J.; Jim ej nez,
J. L.; Palacios, J. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1992, 2205 and
references therein.
1
998, 8, 2333. (e) Lockhoff, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3436. (f)
Ziegler, T.; Gerling, S.; Lang M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2109.
Nunns, C. L.; Spence, L. A.; Slater, M. J.; Berrisford, D. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 9341.
(13) Kogan, T. P.; Dupre, B.; Bui, H.; McAbee, K. L.; Kassir, J. M.;
Scott, I. L.; Hu, X.; Vanderslice, P.; Beck, P. J.; Dixon, R. A. F. J. Med.
Chem. 1998, 41, 1099.
2630
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 17, 2001