Paper
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
10 T. Tischer, T. K. Claus, K. K. Oehlenschlaeger, V. Trouillet,
saponification of the pattern, suggesting that the use of a less
aggressive base such as NaHCO3 is required to fully preserve the
integrity of covalent printing.
¨
M. Bruns, A. Welle, K. Linkert, A. S. Goldmann, H. G. Borner
and C. Barner-Kowollik, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2014,
35, 1121–1127.
¨
11 P. Schroll, C. Fehl, S. Dankesreiter and B. Konig,
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 6510–6514.
12 A. Yu, J. Shang, F. Cheng, B. A. Paik, J. M. Kaplan,
R. B. Andrade and D. M. Ratner, Langmuir, 2012, 28,
11265–11273.
13 M. Dietrich, G. Delaittre, J. P. Blinco, A. J. Inglis, M. Bruns
and C. Barner-Kowollik, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2012, 22,
304–312.
14 T. Tischer, C. Rodriguez-Emmenegger, V. Trouillet,
A. Welle, V. Schueler, J. O. Mueller, A. S. Goldmann,
E. Brynda and C. Barner-Kowollik, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26,
4087–4092.
15 M. d’Halluin, J. Rull-Barrull, E. Le Grognec, D. Jacquemin
and F.-X. Felpin, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 7672–7675.
16 H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 2004–2021.
Conclusions
In summary, we have unveiled the concept of covalent printing
as a very appealing strategy for the patterning of cellulose paper
with small molecules acting as inks covalently anchored to the
surface of the cellulosic material. The general strategy is based
on the use of a photoresponsive paper bearing disulfide func-
tional groups and allowing, upon light irradiation, free-radical
thiol–X ligations of chromophoric small molecules as inks with
a powerful spatio-temporal control. The studies described in
this contribution led to the covalent printing of (i) hidden
patterns using coumarin units as inks and (ii) pH-responsive
colorimetric writing through the use of a rhodamine moiety as
a responsive dye. While the concept of covalent printing onto
cellulose paper is in its early stage and deserves improvement
for increasing its throughput, we believe that it will find a broad
range of applications for sensing, medicine, catalysis and anti-
counterfeiting in a near future.
¨
17 C. G. Schafer, M. Gallei, J. T. Zahn, J. Engelhardt, G. P. Hellmann
and M. Rehahn, Chem. Mater., 2013, 25, 2309–2318.
18 J. H. Soh, K. M. K. Swamy, S. K. Kim, S. Kim, S.-H. Lee and
J. Yoon, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 5966–5969.
19 F. Ali, S. Saha, A. Maity, N. Taye, M. K. Si, E. Suresh,
B. Ganguly, S. Chattopadhyay and A. Das, J. Phys. Chem. B,
2015, 119, 13018–13026.
20 C. E. Hoyle and C. N. Bowman, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010,
49, 1540–1573.
21 N. T. Brummelhuis and H. Schlaad, Radical Thiol–X Click
Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012.
Acknowledgements
´
MdH thanks the ‘‘Region des Pays de la Loire’’ and the CNRS for
the grant. FXF is the member of the ‘‘Institut Universitaire de
France, IUF.’’ Denis Loquet (University of Nantes) and François-
`
Xavier Lefevre (University of Nantes) are gratefully acknowledged
for elemental and SEM analyses, respectively. SEM analyses were
carried out at the ‘‘Institut des materiaux Jean Rouxel.’’
´ `
22 F. Denes, M. Pichowicz, G. Povie and P. Renaud, Chem. Rev.,
´
2014, 114, 2587–2693.
23 C. E. Hoyle, A. B. Lowe and C. N. Bowman, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2010, 39, 1355–1387.
24 A. B. Lowe, Polym. Chem., 2010, 1, 17–36.
25 A. B. Lowe, Polymer, 2014, 55, 5517–5549.
26 J. Escorihuela, A. T. M. Marcelis and H. Zuilhof, Adv. Mater.
Interfaces, 2015, 2, 1500135.
Notes and references
1 D. N.-S. Hon, Cellulose, 1994, 1, 1–25.
2 D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H.-P. Fink and A. Bohn, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 3358–3393.
´
´
27 G.-L. Zhao, J. Hafren, L. Deiana and A. Cordova, Macromol.
3 B. J. de Gans, P. C. Duineveld and U. S. Schubert, Adv. Mater.,
Rapid Commun., 2010, 31, 740–744.
2004, 16, 203–213.
¨
¨
28 P. Tingaut, R. Hauert and T. Zimmermann, J. Mater. Chem.,
2011, 21, 16066–16076.
4 T. Ohlund, J. Ortegren, S. Forsberg and H.-E. Nilsson, Appl.
Surf. Sci., 2012, 259, 731–739.
29 J.-L. Huang, C.-J. Li and D. G. Gray, RSC Adv., 2014, 4,
6965–6969.
5 L. L. da Luz, R. Milani, J. F. Felix, I. R. B. Ribeiro, M. Talhavini,
B. A. D. Neto, J. Chojnacki, M. O. Rodrigues and S. A. Ju´nior,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 27115–27123.
´ `
30 L. McSweeney, F. Denes and E. M. Scanlan, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2016, 2080–2095.
¨¨ ¨
6 N. Sandler, A. Maattanen, P. Ihalainen, L. Kronberg,
31 D. Roy, J. T. Guthrie and S. Perrier, Macromolecules, 2005,
38, 10363–10372.
A. Meierjohann, T. Viitala and J. Peltonen, J. Pharm. Sci.,
2011, 100, 3386–3395.
32 A. S. Goldmann, T. Tischer, L. Barner, M. Bruns and
C. Barner-Kowollik, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12, 1137–1145.
33 B. J. C. Duchemin, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 3941–3947.
34 J. Magolan and M. J. Coster, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 5083–5086.
35 A. M. Jawalekar, N. Meeuwenoord, J. G. O. Cremers,
H. S. Overkleeft, G. A. van der Marel, F. P. J. T. Rutjes and
F. L. van Delft, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 287–290.
7 R. D. Boehm, P. R. Miller, J. Daniels, S. Stafslien and
R. J. Narayan, Mater. Today, 2014, 17, 247–252.
8 J. Finnell, Library & Archival Security, 2011, 24, 19–24.
9 T. Tischer, T. K. Claus, M. Bruns, V. Trouillet, K. Linkert,
C. Rodriguez-Emmenegger, A. S. Goldmann, S. Perrier,
¨
H. G. Borner and C. Barner-Kowollik, Biomacromolecules,
2013, 14, 4340–4350.
J. Mater. Chem. C
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017