10.1002/anie.202014180
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
mechanisms for 5 and 6 were investigated by isotopic labelling
experiments with 6,7-dihydro-GPP and all five isotopomers of
(13C)IPP (Table S8), yielding doubly labelled isotopomers of 5
and 6 with GGPPS and CaCS. Similarly, the usage of 10,11-
dihydro-FPP[30] with all five (13C)IPPs, and of synthetic (1-13C)-
and (2-13C)-6,7-dihydro-GPP (Scheme S1) with IPP gave seven
more singly labelled isotopomers of 5 and 6. Their 13C-NMR
spectra (Figure S57) indicated the origin for each carbon in the
We also envisioned that the protonation induced cyclisation of D
to E (Scheme 1) could be blocked by use of 6,7-dihydro-GGPP,
and its derailment products could give further evidence for the
cyclisation mechanism by CaCS. Therefore, 6,7-dihydro-GGPP
was also synthesised (Scheme S3) and enzymatically converted
with CaCS. However, this substrate was not converted efficiently
and despite the usage of 220 mg of substrate only some trace
compounds could be observed by GC/MS (Figure S85).
2
C1–C10 + C19 and C20 portion. Moreover, the JC,C couplings
In summary, the diterpene synthase CaCS from C. acidiphila
was functionally characterised and found to produce the novel 6-
6-6 tricyclic diterpene alcohol catenul-14-en-6-ol (1) and two 6-7-
observed in the double labelling experiments with (1-13C)IPP
(labelling at C1/C5) and with (2-13C)IPP (labelling at C2/C6)
gave further evidence for the 1,6-ring closure in 5 and 6.
5
tricyclic compounds, isocatenula-2,14-diene (2) and
The absolute configurations of 5 and 6 were determined by the
enantioselective labelling strategy using 6,7-dihydro-GPP with
(R)- and (S)-(1-13C,1-2H)IPP and with (E)- and (Z)-(4-13C,4-
isocatenula-2(6),14-diene (3). Extensive labelling studies gave
detailed insights into the cyclisation cascade and the absolute
configurations of all three products. Furthermore, substrate
analogs with a saturated double bond were synthesised and
enzymatically converted, leading for 14,15-dihydro-GGPP to a
series of derailment products that further supported the
mechanistic model for the cyclisation cascade. As substrate
analogs may adopt a different conformation in the enzyme than
the native substrate, the absolute configurations and cyclisation
mechanisms to all derailment products were also investigated by
labelling experiments, demonstrating that all compounds are
formed from a common substrate fold. Some of the obtained
derailment compounds showed structural similarities to known
natural products from termites and soft corals and also allowed
for a deeper understanding of their chemistry. However, the
starting point of our study was the observed diterpene
production by C. acidiphila, and although by the present work a
diterpene synthase with interesting products has been
discovered, none of these diterpenes showed an identical mass
spectrum to the compounds observed in headspace extracts
from C. acidiphila (compare Figures S1 and S5), suggesting that
a different DTS may be responsible for its biosynthesis. Its
discovery will be on the list of our future research.
2H)IPP,
or
(R)-
and
(S)-(1-13C,1-2H)-6,7-dihydro-GPP
(synthesised as in Scheme S2 in high enantiomeric purity,
Figure S58) with IPP (Figures S59 – S64). The experiments with
(R)- and (S)-(1-13C,1-2H)IPP also demonstrated the specific
migration of the 1-pro-S hydrogen from A’ to B’. The absolute
configurations of 5 and 6 are analogous to that of natural 5a.[31]
Compound 5a is also known as a degradation product of
obscuronatin (4a), a known diterpene alcohol from the soft coral
Xenia obscuronata[32] that shares the skeleton with the
hypothetical intermediate 14,15-dihydroobscuronatin (4).
Therefore, we assumed 5 and 6 may likewise be degradation
products of 4, and indeed their formation depended on the
usage of MgSO4 during workup (Figures S65 and S66),
suggesting that the 1,6-cyclisation in 5 and 6 is not under
enzyme control. Their formation can be explained by water
elimination through cations H and I. Workup without drying the
organic extract with MgSO4 allowed the isolation of 4, followed
by structure elucidation through NMR spectroscopy (Table S9,
Figures S67 – S73), revealing the structure of an only 1,10-
cyclised enzyme product and thus further supporting the 1,10-
cyclisation as an early event of CaCS catalysis. Labelling of the
carbons of the core structure strengthened the structural
2
assignment, this time giving no JC,C couplings in the double
Acknowledgements
labelling experiments with 6,7-dihydro-GPP and (1-13C)IPP or (2-
13C)IPP in agreement with the macrocyclic ring, and allowed to
follow the biosynthetic origin of the labelled carbons (Figure
S74). However, the relative configuration of 4 with its distant
stereogenic centres at C3 and C10/C11 could not independently
be determined by NOESY. Therefore, the skeleton was rigidified
in a reaction with NBS, resulting in the formation of 7 for which
the full relative configuration could be determined by NMR-
based structure elucidation (Table S10, Figures S75 – S81).
Assuming that the stereogenic centres in 4 are not affected in
the conversion to 7, these results allowed to deduce the full
relative configuration for 4. Notably, this reaction may have
some biosynthetic significance, as vanadium-dependent
haloperoxidases can catalyse similar transformations, which is
especially important in the marine environment.[33-35] The
brominated sesquiterpene 7a is structurally closely related to 7
and is a known natural product from the seaweed Laurencia
microcladia[36] that potentially arises by such an enzymatic
reaction. The absolute configuration of 4 was determined
through enantioselective deuteration (Figures S82 – S84).
This work was funded by the DFG (DI1536/7-2) and also
partially by the Natural Science foundation of China (81991521
and 81520108028). Geng Li is thankful for funding from the
CAS-DAAD Doctoral Joint Scholarship Program. We thank
Andreas Schneider for HPLC purifications.
Keywords: terpenoids • biosynthesis • enzyme mechanisms •
isotopes • substrate analogs
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
D. W. Christianson, Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11570.
A. Minami, T. Ozaki, C. Liu, H. Oikawa, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018, 35, 1330.
J. S. Dickschat, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2016, 33, 87.
C. M. Starks, K. Back, J. Chappell, J. P. Noel, Science 1997, 277, 1815.
K. U. Wendt, K. Poralla, G. E. Schulz, Science 1997, 277, 1811.
D. J. Tantillo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10040.
Y. J. Hong, D. J. Tantillo, Aust. J. Chem. 2017, 70, 362.
M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1972, 11, 129.
P. Gutta, D. J. Tantillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6172.
[10] C. L. Hugelshofer, T. Magauer, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2017, 34, 228.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.