NOVEL PYRAN AND POLYHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES
Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry for compounds 1, 4, and 7
1251
Compound no.
D–H···A, Å
D–H, Å H···A, Å D···A, Å D–H···A, deg
Symmetry code
1
N1–H1A···O2
N1–H1B···N2
C1–4H14A···O2
0.8600
0.8600
0.9300
0.8600
0.8600
0.8600
0.9800
2.0800
2.6200
2.4800
2.7600
2.0800
2.1500
2.6700
2.9136
3.1676
3.2381
3.4424
2.6893
2.9037
3.1926
164.00
123.00
138.00
137.00
127.00
145.00
114.00
–1/2 + x, 1/2 – y, 1/2 + z
1/2 + x, 1/2 – y, 1/2 + z
4
7
N1–H1D···Cl1
N1–H1D···O2
N1–H1E···O3
C14–H14A···Cl1
x, 1 + y, z
x, 1 + y, z
N2–H2A···O3
C5–H5A···O2
0.8600
1.9700
2.8236
170.00
x, 1/2 – y, –1/2 + z
0.9600
2.1200
2.8582
133.00
Table 3. Growth inhibitory effects of compounds 1–9 and
CONCLUSIONS
vinorebine on Saos-2, MG-63, 143B, and U2-OS cancer cells
Based on biological activity of the synthesized com-
pounds, polyhydroquinoline derivatives 7–9 exhibit more
efficient inhibition of the cancer cells lines than pyran
derivatives 1–6. Therefore, compounds 7–9 can be consi-
dered as potential anticancer drugs, yet requiring further
tests for determining their in vivo anticancer activity.
IC50, μM
Compound
Saos-2 MG-63 143B
U2-OS
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
45
1
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
30
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
25
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
40
2
3
REFERENCES
4
1. Du, X., Shi, Z., Peng, Z., Zhao, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z.,
Li, X., Liu, G., and Li, X., J. Cell Physiol., 2017,
vol. 232, p. 3296. doi 10.1002/jcp.25773
5
6
2. Song, Y., Li, N., Gu, J., Fu, S., Peng, Z., Zhao, C.,
Zhang, Y., Li, X., Wang, Z., Li, X., and Liu, G., J. Dairy
Sci., 2016, vol. 99, p. 9184. doi 10.3168/jds.2016-11219
3. Sun, X., Yuan, X., Chen, L., Wang, T., Wang, Z., Sun, G.,
Li, X., Li, X., and Liu, G., Cell Physiol. Biochem.,
2017, vol. 42, p. 1109. doi 10.1159/000478765
7
8
30
35
35
40
9
35
30
30
30
Vinorebine
35
30
40
35
4. Du, X., Zhu, Y., Peng, Z., Cui, Y., Zhang, Q., Shi, Z.,
Guan, Y., Sha, X., Shen, T., Yang, Y., Li, X., Wang, Z.,
Li, X., and Liu, G., J. Dairy Sci., 2018, vol. 101, p. 1.
doi 10.3168/jds.2017-13234
The compounds contain multiple hydrogen bonds (1:
N–H···O, C–H···O and N–H···N; 4: N–H···Cl, C–
H···Cl, N–H···O; 7: C–H···O and N–H···O) in their
packing structures (Fig. 3). By means of these
interactions via H-bonds, they all display 2-D supra-
molecular structures.
5. Li, J., Lv, C.W., Li, X.J., Qu, D., Hou, Z., Jia, M.,
Luo, X.X., Li, X., and Li, M.K., Molecules, 2015,
vol. 20, p. 17469. doi 10.3390/molecules200917469
6. Khan, K.M., Iqbal, S., Lodhi, M.A., Maharvi, G.M., Zia-
Ullah, Choudhary, M.I., Atta-ur-Rahman, and Perveen, S.,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2004, vol. 12, p. 1963. doi
10.1016/j.bmc.2004.01.010
Antitumor activity. The synthesized compounds
1–9 were evaluated against Saos-2, MG-63, 143B, and
U2-OS human osteosarcoma cells by the MTT assay
(Table 3). Compounds 1–6 were inactive against all of
these cell lines (IC50 > 100 μM). Upon incubation of
the tumor cells in the presence of compounds 7–9 for
72 h, the IC50 values determined for the compounds
ranged from 25 to 45 μM. In some cases the values
were lower than those of vinorebine. The accumulated
data indicated that compounds 7–9 exhibited anti-
cancer activity against all of these cell lines.
7. Khan, A.T., Lal, M., Ali, S., and Khan, Md.M.,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, vol. 52, p. 5327. doi 10.1016/
j.ejmech.2018.04.005
8. Li, J., Sui, Y.P., Xin, J.J., et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 2015, vol. 25, p. 5520. doi 10.1016/
j.bmcl.2015.10.063
9. Li, J., Xue, X.-Y., Li, X., et al., Arch. Pharm. Res.,
2016, vol. 39, p. 1349. doi 10.1007/s12272-015-0614-7
10. Sheldrick, G.M., SHELXL-97, Program for Solution
Crystal Structure and Refinement, Göttingen: University
of Göttingen, Germany 1997.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 88 No. 6 2018