M. E. Jung, B. A. Duclos / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 107–109
109
H
H
the pentadienyl cations being partially formed in the
transition state outweighs the very small difference in the
steric size of the two groups and determines the stereo-
chemistry of the product.
H
H
O
Me
Me
O
Me
Me
Me
vs
O
O
O
O
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Li
H
Li
H
G
H
Me
In summary, we have shown that the substrates 7a–e can
be tuned to provide varying olefin geometries according
_
_
H
H
5
O
O
Me
to the steric demand of the substituents. By changing
Me
+
Me
+
the size of the group at the olefinic carbon, one can
change the selectivity from modestly Z-selective (1.8:1)
to completely E-selective (100:1).
vs
O
O
O
O
Me
Li
Li
I
J
W
Me
S
Scheme 5.
Acknowledgements
E was formed). The substrate with the smallest R group,
the ethynyl substrate 7e, afforded the expected product
We thank the NIH and the University of California
Universitywide AIDS Research Program (UARP-ID02-
LA-007) for generous financial support.
3
eZ, namely the Z-alkene corresponding to F, since the
methyl substituent is now the larger one and prefers the
equatorial position, for example D. The only somewhat
surprising case is the olefin 7d where both vinylic units
prefer the equatorial position vs. the sterically slightly
References and Notes
larger methyl group (A values: methyl, 1.74; vinyl, 1.49–
3
1
.68). The small difference in A values does not corre-
1. (a) Carroll, M. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1940, 704–706; (b) Carroll,
M. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1941, 507–511; (c) Kimel, W.; Cope,
A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1943, 65, 1992–1998.
spond well with the 3:1 ratio of E to Z products
observed, which is in the opposite direction for a purely
steric influence. Therefore we believe that an electronic
effect must be responsible and suggest the following. If
the bond breaking is fairly advanced in the transition
state (which may be reasonable for a trimethyl-substi-
tuted pentadienyl acetoacetate), then the relative
stability of the conformations of the nascent pentadienyl
cations would play a role. Thus for the transition states
leading to the products 3d, G and H, breaking the C–O
bond to generate the enolate and the pentadienyl cation
would be more favorable for G generating I since that
forms the pentadienyl cation in its more stable W con-
formation whereas breaking the same bond in H to
generate J would be less favorable since now the pen-
tadienyl cation is formed in its less stable S conforma-
tion (Scheme 5). Streitweiser has calculated that the
difference in energy favors the W conformation over the
S conformation by about 3.7 kcal/mol with the U con-
2
.
Wilson, S. R.; Augelli, C. E. Org. Synth. 1990, 68, 210–
19.
2
3
.
(a) Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic
Compounds; Wiley: New York, 1994, pp. 695–698; (b)
Eliel, E. L.; Manoharan, M. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1959–
1
962.
Pratt, L. M.; Streitweiser, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 290–
94.
4
.
2
5. The methyl ester derivative of 7 (R ¼ CO Me) was
2
also prepared, but when the b-keto ester derived from
it was subjected to treatment with LDA the corre-
sponding tetronic acid was formed instead of the
desired a; b-unsaturated ester. For a similar result, see
6
Takaiwa et al. Similarly, the dithiane derivative of 7
] did not provide the desired b-keto
CH ], perhaps due to complica-
[
R ¼ CH(SCH
2
)
2
CH
2
acid, 8 [R ¼ CH(SCH
2
)
2
2
tions due to the presence of the relatively acidic dithiane
proton.
6
.
(a) Takaiwa, A.; Yamashita, K. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1982,
46, 1721–1722; (b) Takaiwa, A.; Yamashita, K. Agric. Biol.
Chem. 1984, 48, 2061–2065.
4
formation being quite high in energy. Thus we suggest
that the energy difference of the two conformations of