Palladium-Containing Perovskites in the Suzuki Reaction
FULL PAPERS
hatsu Motor Company for their kind gift of perovskite catalysts,
Hokko Chemical Industry Co. Ltd., for their assistance in sam-
ple preparation and the Royal Society for a URF (to MDS).
[24] D. A. Conlon, B. Pipik, S. Ferdinand, C. R. LeBlond,
J. R. Sowa, B. Izzo, P. Collins, G. J. Ho, J. M. Williams,
Y. J. Shi, Y. K. Sun, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 931.
[25] I. W. Davies, L. Matty, D. L. Hughes, P. J. Reider, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10139.
[26] A. Biffis, M. Zecca, M. Basato, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001,
1131.
References and Notes
[27] Y. Na, S. Park, S. B. Han, H. Han, S. Ko, S. Chang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 250.
[28] C. A. Jaska, I. Manners, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
9776.
[29] Y. Nishihata, J. Mizuki, T. Akao, H. Tanaka, M. Uenishi,
M. Kimura, T. Okamoto, N. Hamada, Nature 2002, 418,
164.
[30] N. Miyaura, T. Yanagi, A. Suzuki, Synth. Commun. 1981,
11, 513.
[31] M. D. Smith, A. F. Stepan, C. Ramarao, P. E. Brennan,
S. V. Ley, Chem. Commun. 2003, 2652.
[32] This is an improvement on our previously disclosed value
of 27,000.
[33] F. G. J. Rebek, S. Zimmerman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975,
97, 454.
[1] The classical, solubility-based definition equates “hetero-
geneous” to “insoluble” and “homogeneous” to “solu-
ble”. When referring to this definition, quotation marks
will be used (ꢀhomogeneousꢁ, ꢀheterogeneousꢁ). A newer
definition deals with the active site of the catalytic sys-
tem; see J. Schwartz, Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 18, 302. If
the active site is uniform, the system is called homogene-
ous; if the active site consists of irregular sites, then the
catalyst is called heterogeneous. When referring to this
definition no quotation marks will be used.
[2] R. B. Bedford, S. L. Hazelwood, M. E. Limmert, Chem.
Commun. 2002, 2610.
[3] R. B. Bedford, S. L. Welch, Chem. Commun. 2001, 129.
[4] J. P. Wolfe, R. A. Singer, B. H. Yang, S. L. Buchwald, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9550.
[34] F. G. J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7112.
[35] J. A. Widegren, M. A. Bennett, R. G. Finke, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10301.
[36] J. A. Widegren, R. G. Finke, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
2003, 198, 317.
[37] B. H. Lipshutz, S. Tasler, W. Chrisman, B. Spliethoff, B.
Tesche, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1177.
[38] P. M. Maitlis, J. Mol. Cat. 1980, 7, 543.
[39] M. T. Reetz, J. G. de Vries, Chem. Commun. 2004, 14,
1559.
[40] M. T. Reetz, E. Westermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit.
2000, 39, 165.
[41] B. J. Hornstein, J. D. Aiken, R. G. Finke, Inorg. Chem.
2002, 41, 1625.
[42] In cases where a heterogeneous precatalyst generates a
catalytically active soluble catalyst, the stoichiometry of
such poisoning studies are useful for the calculation of
turnover numbers but are not particularly informative
for the investigation of homogeneous versus heterogene-
ous mechanisms.
[5] S. D. Walker, T. E. Barder, J. R. Martinelli, S. L. Buch-
wald, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2004, 43, 1871.
[6] A. F. Littke, G. C. Fu, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2002, 41,
4176.
[7] A. F. Littke, C. Y. Dai, G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 4020.
[8] C. E. Garrett, K. Prasad, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346,
889.
[9] C. Ramarao, S. V. Ley, S. C. Smith, I. M. Shirley, N.
DeAlmeida, Chem. Commun. 2002, 1132.
[10] S. V. Ley, C. Mitchell, D. Pears, C. Ramarao, J. Q. Yu,
W. Z. Zhou, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4665.
[11] S. Kobayashi, R. Akiyama, Chem. Commun. 2003, 449.
[12] R. Akiyama, S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
3412.
[13] K. Okamoto, R. Akiyama, S. Kobayashi, Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 1987.
[14] B. M. Trost, E. Keinan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100,
7779.
[15] A. Datta, K. Ebert, H. Plenio, Organometallics 2003, 22,
4685.
[43] The true turnover number takes into account the number
of catalytically active metal sites in the molecule, and for
the catalyst described here is 100 times greater than first
indicated (giving a true turnover number of 24.3 million).
For a soluble catalyst generated from an insoluble preca-
talyst, it is to be expected that the soluble palladium con-
tent of the reaction mixture may vary as the reaction pro-
gresses. In the studies presented herein, there was rela-
tively little variation in the amount of CS2 required to
poison the reaction over a range of experiments, and
no correlation between product conversion (when the
poison was added) and the volume of CS2 required to
stop any catalysis.
[16] Y. M. A. Yamada, K. Takeda, H. Takahashi, S. Ikegami,
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7733.
[17] K. Kçhler, R. G. Heidenreich, J. G. E. Krauter, M.
Pietsch, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 622.
[18] R. G. Heidenreich, E. G. E. Krauter, J. Pietsch, K. Kçh-
ler, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2002, 182, 499.
[19] R. G. Heidenreich, K. Kçhler, J. G. E. Krauter, J. Pietsch,
Synlett 2002, 1118.
[20] Z. Novak, A. Szabo, J. Repasi, A. Kotschy, J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 3327.
[21] N. E. Leadbeater, M. Marco, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit.
2003, 42, 1407.
[22] N. E. Leadbeater, M. Marco, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
5660.
[23] S. S. Prockl, W. Kleist, M. A. Gruber, K. Kçhler, Angew.
Chem. Int. Edit. 2004, 43, 1881.
[44] C. Amatore, A. Jutand, Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 314.
[45] D. Zim, A. L. Monteiro, J. Dupont, Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 8199.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 647–654
asc.wiley-vch.de
ꢂ 2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
653