104308-7
Reaction of anthracene with OH radicals
J. Chem. Phys. 122, 104308 ͑2005͒
anthracene,15,24 and this tendency is confirmed by molecular
orbital calculations.30 One explanation could be steric hin-
drance for reaction on the carbon atoms bearing the most
positive electric charges.15 It would be interesting to check
whether this difference between the rate constants exists over
a large temperature range.
FIG. 8. Conventional numbering of the carbon atoms in anthracene.
1H. Naraoka, A. Shimoyama, and K. Harada, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 184,
1 ͑2000͒.
The last question to be answered concerns the isomer
that is formed through OH addition. The numbering of the
carbon atoms in anthracene according to the chemical ab-
stracts convention is displayed in Fig. 8, and three isomers
can be formed by addition on carbon 1, 2, or 9. The net
atomic charge for each carbon has been evaluated by semi-
empirical molecular orbital calculations,15 and the carbon
with the most positive net charge is considered to be the
most reactive position, provided it is not sterically hindered.
In the case of anthracene, no steric hindrance occurs, and the
most reactive carbon is number 9. We therefore expect to
form the product displayed in Fig. 9.
2A. Léger and J. L. Puget, Astron. Astrophys. 137, L5 ͑1984͒.
3A. Léger and L. d’Hendecourt, Astron. Astrophys. 146, 81 ͑1985͒.
4R. Atkinson and J. Arey, Environ. Health Perspect. 102, 117 ͑1994͒.
5M. M. C. Ferreira, Chemosphere 44, 125 ͑2001͒.
6M. D. Guillen and P. Sopelana, in Food Safety, edited by J. P. F. D’Mello
͑CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 2003͒, p. 175.
7M. A. Mehlman, M. M. Mumtaz, O. Faroon, and C. T. De Rosa, in Ad-
vances in Modern Environmental Toxicology, edited by C. T. De Rosa, J.
S. Holler, and M. A. Mehlman ͑Princeton Scientific, Princeton, NJ, 2002͒,
Vol. 26, p. 201.
8A. M. Mastral, M. S. Callen, J. M. Lopez, R. Murillo, T. Garcia, and M. V.
Navarro, Fuel Process. Technol. 80, 183 ͑2003͒.
9I. M. Kennedy, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 23, 95 ͑1997͒.
10H. Richter and J. B. Howard, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 26, 565 ͑2000͒.
11R. Atkinson, Atmos. Environ. 34, 2063 ͑2000͒.
12R. Atkinson and J. Arey, Atmos. Environ. 37, S197 ͑2003͒.
13R. Atkinson and J. Arey, Chem. Rev. ͑Washington, D.C.͒ 103, 4605
͑2003͒.
IV. CONCLUSION
This paper reports the first direct gas-phase measurement
of the rate constant for the reaction of the hydroxyl radical
with anthracene between 58 and 470 K. The experiments
used the pulsed laser photolysis, laser-induced fluorescence
method in the supersaturated environment provided by the
CRESU apparatus. We observe a slight negative temperature
dependence of the rate constant as expected for an exother-
mic reaction without barrier on the entrance channel, and the
rate coefficient can be fitted by k͑cm3 molecules−1 s−1͒
=1.12ϫ10−10͑T/298͒−0.46. This rate constant corresponds to
the formation of the adduct. Further investigations of the
products are needed to explore whether this adduct survives,
or decomposes to form the alcohol via H elimination.
14R. Atkinson, J. Arey, B. Zielinska, and S. M. Aschmann, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 21, 1014 ͑1987͒.
15W. W. Brubaker and R. A. Hites, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 915 ͑1998͒.
16W. W. Brubaker and R. A. Hites, Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 3913 ͑1998͒.
17N. J. Bunce, L. Liu, J. Zhu, and D. A. Lane, Environ. Sci. Technol. 31,
2252 ͑1997͒.
18P. T. Phousongphouang and J. Arey, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 1947
͑2002͒.
19F. Reisen and J. Arey, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 4302 ͑2002͒.
20J. S. Sasaki, S. M. Aschmann, E. C. S. Kwok, R. Atkinson, and J. Arey,
Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 3173 ͑1997͒.
21M. J. Kurylo and V. L. Orkin, Chem. Rev. ͑Washington, D.C.͒ 103, 5049
͑2003͒.
22http://kinetics.nist.gov/, last update: 2000.
23K. Lorenz and R. Zellner, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 87, 629 ͑1983͒.
24H. W. Biermann, H. MacLeod, R. Atkinson, A. M. Winer, and J. N. Pitts,
Jr., Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 244 ͑1985͒.
Another point that needs further experiments is the dif-
ference between the reactivity of phenanthrene and anthra-
cene toward OH, although both molecules are isomers. All
authors who measured the reaction rate of phenanthrene
found it considerably smaller than the reaction rate with
25E. S. C. Kwok, W. P. Harger, J. Arey, and R. Atkinson, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 28, 521 ͑1994͒.
26W. Lee, P. S. Stevens, and R. A. Hites, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 6603
͑2003͒.
27I. R. Sims, J. L. Queffelec, A. Defrance, C. Rebrion-Rowe, D. Travers, B.
R. Rowe, and I. W. M. Smith, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 8798 ͑1992͒.
28CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics ͑CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1994͒.
29I. R. Sims, I. W. M. Smith, P. Bocherel, A. Defrance, D. Travers, and B. R.
Rowe, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 90, 1473 ͑1994͒.
30A. Klamt, Chemosphere 26, 1273 ͑1994͒.
31R. Atkinson, Chem. Rev. ͑Washington, D.C.͒ 85, 69 ͑1985͒.
32C. Barckholtz, T. A. Barckholtz, and C. M. Hadad, J. Phys. Chem. A 105,
140 ͑2001͒.
33E. C. S. Kwok and R. Atkinson, Atmos. Environ. 29, 1685 ͑1995͒.
34T. S. Lay and J. W. Bozzelli, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 6543 ͑1996͒.
35A. Ricca and C. W. Bauschlicher, Jr., Chem. Phys. Lett. 328, 396 ͑2000͒.
FIG. 9. Preferred adduct formed by addition of OH on carbon 9.
138.251.14.35 On: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:17:10