8212
J. Grolik et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 8209–8213
tration through
a pad of Celite under argon.
3-Formylchromone (0.36 g, 2.1 mmol) was immediately
added to the filtrate and the mixture was allowed to re-
flux under argon for 2 h. The crude product which pre-
cipitated after cooling was filtered off and recrystallized
from acetone–methanol (4:1). Brown crystals, yield
1
0.49 g (41%), mp 192 ꢁC. H NMR (300 MHz; CDCl3,
d ppm): 0.87 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 24H, Hj,k), 0.93 (d,
J = 6.3 Hz, 12H, H-1), 1.17 (m, 8H, Hg), 1.18 (m, 4H,
He), 1.33 (m, 8H, Hf), 1.33 (m, 4H, He), 1.54 (m,
4H, Hi), 1.60 (m, 4H, Hb), 1.66 (m, 4H, Hd), 1.84 (m,
4H, Hb), 3.96 (t, J = 6.75 Hz, 8H, Ha), 6.64 (s, 4H,
H-1,4,10,13), 6.88 (dd, J = 7.5 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H,
Hs), 7.06 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Hq), 7.45 (dd, J = 7.8 Hz,
J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Hr), 7.55 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ht), 8.34
(d, J = 6 Hz, 4H, H-6,8,15,17), 11.37 (s, 2H, Hu),
14.97 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H, NH); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3, d ppm): 19.6 (Ci), 22.6, 22.69 (Cj,k), 24.7 (Cf),
27.98 (Ci), 29.9 (Cd), 36.2 (Cb), 37.3 (Ce), 39.2 (Cg),
68.0 (Ca), 100.6 (C-1,4,10,13), 108.9 (Ch), 118.1 (Cs),
118.4 (Cq), 120.2 (C-7,16), 130.1 (C-5a,9a,14a,18a),
131.1 (Ct), 134.6 (Cr), 148.6 (C-2,3,11,12), 150.7 (C-
6,8,15,17), 161.5 (Cp), 195.9 (Cm); IR (KBr) mmax
(cmÀ1): 2954, 2927, 2869, 1565, 1216, 1009, 815; ESI-
MS (m/z) 1154.2 (M+H)+; Anal. Calcd. for
C72H104N4O8: C, 74.96; H, 9.09; N, 4.86. Found: C,
74.04; H, 9.03; N, 4.93.
Figure 5. Texture of 7 observed on cooling, at 160 ꢁC, under partially
crossed polarizers.
stacking interactions. The molecules are linked by C5–
H5 Á Á Á O1ii hydrogen bonds [C5–H5 = 0.97(2), H5 Á Á Á
ii
O1ii = 2.57(2), C5 Á Á Á O1 = 3.398(2) A, \C5-H5 Á Á Á
˚
O1ii = 144.4(13)ꢁ] (symmetry: ii = Àx, Ày, 1 À z).
3,7-Dimethyl-1-octanol 2 and 3-formylchromone were
purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and were used as re-
ceived. Products 3 and 4 were prepared according to
the procedures reported elsewhere.12,13 Compound 1
was synthesized using the previously reported proce-
dure.9 Crystals suitable for X-ray measurements were
grown from ethyl acetate.
1,2-Dinitro-4,5-bis(3,7-dimethyloctyloxy)benzene 5: A
solution of 4 (3.5 g, 9.1 mmol) in dichloromethane
(50 ml) was added dropwise to vigorously stirred con-
centrated HNO3 (20 ml) over a period of 30 min. Con-
centrated sulfuric acid (10 ml) was then added in
portions and stirring was continued for 1.5 h at room
temperature. The reaction mixture was next poured
onto crushed ice and the resultant suspension was ex-
tracted with dichloromethane (2 · 50 ml). The organic
layer was washed thoroughly with saturated aqueous so-
dium carbonate, then with water, and finally dried over
anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent was evaporated to give
a crude product which was crystallized from ethanol.
Pale-yellow crystals, yield 3.5 g (81%), mp 81–82 ꢁC.
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for
the structure in this paper have been deposited with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supple-
mentary publication number CCDC 616527. Copies of
the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application
to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK
[e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
Supplementary data
The photographs of the mesomorphic textures observed
on heating, the HETCOR spectrum and DSC curves of
7 are given in the Supplementary data. Supplementary
data associated with this article can be found, in the
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3,
d ppm): 0.87 (d,
J = 6.6 Hz, 12H, Hj,k), 0.96 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 6H, H-1),
1.1–2.0 (m, 20H, Hb,d,e,f,g,i), 4.13 (t, 4H, J = 5.9 Hz,
Ha), 7.31 (s, 2H, H-3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, d
ppm): 19.6 (C-1), 22.5, 22.6 (Cj,k), 24.6, 27.9, 29.8,
35.5, 37.1, 39.1 (Cb,d,e,f,g,i), 68.6 (Ca), 107.7 (C-3,6),
136.4 (C-1,2), 151.7 (C-4,5); IR (KBr) mmax (cmÀ1):
3072, 2958, 2926, 2870, 2845, 1538, 1221, 1048, 875;
ESI-MS (m/z) 481.4 (M+H)+; Anal. Calcd. for
C26H44N2O6: C, 64.97; H, 9.23; N, 5.83. Found: C,
65.05; H, 9.12; N, 5.86.
References and notes
1. Chandrasekhar, S.; Sadashiva, B. K.; Suresh, K. A.
Pramana 1977, 9, 471–480.
2. Dalcanale, E. In Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemis-
try; Atwood, J. L., Davies, J. E. D., MacNicol, D. D.,
Vo¨gtle, F., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, New York, 1996;
Vol. 10, pp 583–635.
3. Mountford, P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 105–115, and
references therein.
4. Hunziker, M. Eur. Pat. 162804 (1984) (Chem. Abstr. 1987,
106, 41716p).
5. (a) Forget, S.; Veber, M.; Strzelecka, H. Mol. Cryst. Liq.
Cryst. 1995, 258, 263–275; (b) Forget, S.; Veber, M. New
J. Chem. 1997, 21, 409–411; (c) Forget, S.; Veber, M. Mol.
Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1997, 300, 229–243; (d) Forget, S.;
Veber, M. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1997, 308, 27–42.
6. Forget, S.; Kitzerow, H. S. Liq. Cryst. 1997, 23, 919–922.
2,3,11,12-Tetra(3,7-dimethyloctyloxy)-7,16-bis(2-hydroxy-
benzoyl)-5,14-dihydrodibenzo[b,i][1,4,8,11]tetraazacyclo-
tetradecine 7: To a reaction mixture containing 5 (1 g,
2.1 mmol) and 10% Pd/C (0.2 g) in methanol (75 ml),
powdered NaBH4 (1.59 g, 42 mmol) was added slowly
in small portions, so as to maintain gentle boiling of
the mixture until the supernatant solution became col-
ourless (about 30 min). The catalyst, solid by-products
and excess of undissolved NaBH4 were removed by fil-