156
Z. Shen et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1149 (2017) 155e161
O
of CD), 4.98 (s, 7H, H-1 of CD). DETA-
b
CD, TETA-
b
CD and TEPA-
b
CD
were prepared by the same approach.
29
30
OH
2.3. Preparation inclusion complexes
20
The GTA/EN-
bCD, GTA/DETA-bCD, GTA/TETA-bCD and GTA/
19
21
TEPA- CD inclusion complex were prepared using a reported
b
H
method [37]. The CDs (0.01 mmol) and GTA (0.03 mmol, 14.1 mg)
were added to ultrapure water (10 mL), and the mixture was stirred
for 72 h at room temperature. Then, the precipitate was removed by
1
2
1
8
2
2
O
1
1
13
14
17
2
5
filtration, and the filtrate was lyophilized to dryness to obtain the
26
2
8
1
GTA/CDs complexes. ( H NMR; 500 MHz, D
2
O):
d
0.76 (s, 3H, H-24
1
4
9
of GTA), 0.98 (s, 3H, H-25 of GTA), 1.25 (s, 2H, H-29 of GTA), 1.4 (s,
3H, H-25 of GTA), 2.7e3.0 (m, 4H, CH CH ), 3.3e3.6 (m, 14H, H-2, 4
of CD), 3.7e3.9 (m, 26H, H-3, 5, 6 of CD), 4.94 (s, 7H, H-1 of CD).
16
2
3
2
2
1
0
8
15
27
5
7
2
.4. Preparation of physical mixture
HO
6
The GTA and EN- CD, DETA-bCD, TETA-bCD and TEPA-bCD
b
physical mixtures were prepared [38]. By mixing GTA and CD de-
rivatives thoroughly in an agate mortar, giving the 1:1 physical
mixture.
2
3
24
Fig. 1. Structure of glycyrrhetic acid (GTA).
2
.5. Phase-solubility diagram
with different tethered chain lengths, including ethylenediamine-
-cyclodextrin (EN- CD), diethylenetriamine- -cyclodextrin
DETA- CD), triethylenetetramine- -cyclodextrin (TETA- CD), and
Tetraethylenepentamine- -cyclodextrin (TEPA- CD).
b
(
b
b
The phase-solubility diagram was investigated by using the
b
b
b
Higuchi and Connors method [39]. An excess amount of GTA was
suspended in ultrapure water containing increasing amounts of
b
b
In this paper, the evaluation of the inclusion behaviors between
GTA and polyamine-modified CDs have been studies by phase-
solubility diagram. Additionally, the solid inclusion complexes
b
CD, EN-
bCD, DETA-bCD, TETA-bCD and TEPA-bCD (from 0.001 to
0.2 M). The mixtures were placed in an ultrasonic bath for 2 h at
25 C. After that, all suspensions were centrifuged and the super-
natants were collected, and filtered over 0.45 m millipore mem-
ꢀ
1
have been characterized by means of H and 2D NMR spectra,
m
powder X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and
scanning electron microscopy. In vitro cytotoxicity of these solid
inclusion complexes was also measured with three cancer cell lines,
HT26, HCT116, and SW480, as well as normal human lung fibroblast
WI-38, to evaluate the potential of GTA in the form of inclusion
complexes with polyamine-modified CDs, which would provide a
useful approach to developing novel GTA products with high water
solubility and bioavailability.
branes. These experiments were repeated three times. The phase-
solubility profiles were obtained by plotting the solubility of GTA
versus the concentration of
TEPA- CD. The apparent stability constant, Ks of GTA and
CD, DETA- CD, TETA- CD and TEPA- CD complexes can be
b
CD, EN-
b
CD, DETA-bCD, TETA-bCD and
b
bCD, EN-
b
b
b
b
calculated from the slope and the intercept of the linear segment of
the phase solubility line using the following equation:
slope
S0ð1 ꢁ slopeÞ
K
s
¼
2
. Materials and methods
The value slope is found in the linear regression and S
0
is the
2
.1. Reagents and materials
aqueous solubility of the drug at pH 7 (S ¼ 0.00632 mg/mL) in the
0
absence of CD, EN- CD, DETA- CD, TETA- CD and TEPA- CD.
b
b
b
b
b
Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA, MW ¼ 470.79, PC > 99%) was purchased
from Sigma (USA). b-CD was purchased from Mengzhou Huaxin
2
.6. X-ray powder diffraction
Biological Technology (Shanghai, China). Other chemicals and re-
agents were of analytical grade. All experiments were conducted by
ultrapure water.
The X-ray Powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were performed
with
a
D/Max-3B diffractometer using Cu-K
a
radiation
ꢀ
(
k ¼ 1.5460 Å, 40 kV, 100 mA), with a 5 /min scanning rate. Powder
samples were mounted on a vitreous sample holder and scanned
2.2. Synthesis of polyamine-b-cyclodextrin
ꢀ
ꢀ
with a step size of 2
q
¼ 0.02 between 2
q
¼ 5e70 .
The method to synthesis EN-
text as a typical example. Mono-6-O-(tolylsulfonyl)-
.32 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL ethanediamine solution, stirred
b
CD was given in the succeeding
b
-CD (3.0 g,
2.7. Differential scanning calorimetry
2
ꢀ
at 85 C for 10 h under N
2
atmosphere with a condense pipe. After
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were
analyzed using a STA449 F1 Jupiter (Netzch Corp, Germany).
that, the solution was poured into 300 mL of acetone. A yellow
precipitate was formed and collected by filtration. Finally, the
precipitate was dissolved in small amount of water and dropped in
acetone again and a light yellow precipitate was formed and
2
Samples were placed under an N flow in the temperature range
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢁ1
from 25 C to 450 C at a heating rate of 10 C$min
.
collected by filtration and dried under vacuum to yield a stable light
2.8. Scanning electron microscopy
1
yellow powder. ( H NMR; 500 MHz, D
2
O):
d
2.6e2.8 (m, 4H,
CH
2
CH
2
), 3.4e3.6 (m, 14H, H-2, 4 of CD), 3.7e3.9 (m, 26H, H-3, 5, 6
The morphologies of the samples were performed on a scanning