306
M. Golets et al. / Journal of Catalysis 307 (2013) 305–315
over Al/SBA-15 and Zn/SBA-15, leading to
q-cymene as the main
with an HP-PONA capillary column (50 m, 0.2 mm I.D., 0.25 lL film
product. According to Du et al., the presence of Zn, in fact, mini-
mized the formation of cracking products due to the lack of
Brønsted acidity of the catalyst [20]. On the other hand, the pres-
ence of moderate Lewis acidity in Zn/SBA15 contributed to
thickness) and a Flame Ionization Detector (FID). Nitrogen was
used as the carrier gas (1.0 mL/min). The temperature program-
ming was as follows: the injection port and detector temperature
were set to 250 °C, column temperature was adjusted to rise from
70 up to 230 °C, with a holding time of 0.5 min at the initial tem-
perature, and a heating ramp of 10 °C/min was applied. The reac-
tant and product retention times (min) were evaluated as
87 wt% yield of
another study, Chinayon et al., observed upon hydrogenation of
acetylene over Pd/ -Al2O3 that a significant improvement of acet-
q-cymene according to their results [20]. In a yet
a
ylene conversion and ethylene selectivity could be obtained when
the Pd sites were modified with Zn. In particular, the authors
follows:
-menthene (9.72), m-cymene (10.45),
nene (10.75), and -terpinene (11.45) (Fig. 1). To evaluate the pos-
sible formation of dimers [22], a prolonged GC analysis method
was tried (30 min) at an elevated temperature of 320 °C. However,
no additional products were detected in the GC chromatograms
upon extended run times. For a detailed product analysis and iden-
tification, GCMS analysis (Gas Chromatography coupled to Mass
Spectrometry; Thermo Trace DSQ) was applied (column VF-5MS,
a
-pinene (8.63), camphene (8.90), trans-pinane (9.50),
q
q
-cymene (10.68), limo-
claimed that less coking could be observed for Pd–Zn/
for Pd/ -Al2O3 [21].
In this study, we investigated the possibility to design a one-
stage continuous process for efficient conversion of -pinene to
-cymene over Pd–Zn/Al-SBA15 catalysts with various ratios and
a-Al2O3 than
c
a
a
q
loadings of Pd and Zn metals. The structure of the catalysts, char-
acterization results, as well as the optimized reaction conditions
was discussed. Still, a kinetic model was proposed that accounts
for the described reaction mechanism.
30 m., 0.25 mm I.D., phase 0.25 lm). Constant nitrogen flow rate
of 1.5 mL/min was utilized. The temperature of the injection and
initial oven temperatures were 230 °C and 50 °C, respectively.
The maximum temperature applied was 300 °C (ramping 20 °C/
min), after one (1) minute of hold time. A representative sample
GC chromatogram with specified retention times is presented in
Fig. 1.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The concentrations were expressed in terms of wt% in reference
The hydrogen gas used was purchased from a commercial
source (AGA AB) and had a purity of 99.999%. All the catalysts were
in-house prepared and characterized at Technical Chemistry,
Department of Chemistry, Umeå University. High purity
to the whole amount of the reacted
a-pinene and other reactants
in the product mixture. Prior to this, each and every standard spe-
cies was calibrated in order to identify and quantify the reaction
products. In addition,
q-cymene was distinguished from m-cym-
(P95 wt%) standards of camphene, limonene,
q-cymene, q-
ene with the help of earlier observations [1]. The following formu-
las were used for the calculation of the conversion, product
selectivities, and yields, respectively:
menthene, -pinene, and -terpinene were obtained from
a
c
Sigma–Aldrich and used as received for calibration of the gas chro-
matograph (GC) to obtain quantitative and qualitative analysis of
the reaction mixtures.
X ð%Þ
initial reactantðsÞ GC peak areaꢀfinal reactantðsÞ GC peak area
¼
ꢁ100
ð1Þ
2.2. Apparatus and general reaction procedure
initial reactantðsÞ GC peak area
The reaction was carried out in a tailor-made flow-through
reactor made of quartz glass and equipped with a heating jacket
and a reflux condenser operated at atmospheric pressure and the
equipped with control unit (CAL 9500P, CAL Controls) for accurate
temperature control of the catalyst bed. The catalyst was loaded in
the reactor tube (0.25 g in a typical experiment) along with the
thermocouple. The catalytic bed was immobilized in the middle
of the tube with the help of glass wool and glass balls. The tube
was fitted inside of the heater and connected with a collection flask
and a reflux condenser coupled to a collection flask. The reactant
and gas inlet feed pipes were connected at the top of the glass tube
for top-down flow, and the temperature was adjusted to the preset
level. Prior to the each and every experimental run, the system was
exposed for 2 h to hydrogen flow to facilitate catalyst activation
and to obtain thermal steady state of the system. Thereafter, the
GC peak area of the product Y
ꢁ 100
SY ð%Þ ¼
ð2Þ
R
GC peak area of all products
SY
100
Yield ð%Þ ¼ X ð%Þ ꢁ
ð3Þ
The weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) was expressed in (g/h)/g
and calculated by the following formula:
mass of reactant=h
mass of catalyst
WHSV ¼
ð4Þ
2.4. Catalyst preparation
reactant feed was initiated by continuously pumping
a-pinene to
The synthesis of SBA-15 material was carried out as described
elsewhere [20]. At first, for the preparation of Al-SBA15 (Si:Al ratio
of 25), 20 g of PEO–PPO–PEO triblock copolymer (P123, 99.0%, Sig-
ma–Aldrich) was dissolved in 150 mL of deionized water and
mixed with 600 mL of 2.0 M HCl. Consequently, the mixture was
left under stirring for 3 h, at 40 °C. As the next step, tetraethyl
orthosilicate (TEOS, 99.0%, Sigma–Aldrich) and AlCl3 (98.0%, Sig-
ma–Aldrich) were added in amounts of 42.5 and 1.93 g, respec-
tively. The mixture was stirred for 24 h at the above-mentioned
temperature. At the next stage, the solution was aged in an oven
(90 °C, 24 h). The obtained support structure was filtered and
washed thoroughly with deionized water and 250 mL of ethanol.
At the final stage, the formed Al-SBA15 was dried at 90 °C over-
night and calcined at 550 °C for 6 h.
the top of the upper section of the reactor tube acting as a vapor-
izer by means of an HPLC pump (high-precision liquid chromatog-
raphy pump), and thus, the reaction was commenced. For the
reliable investigation of the reaction kinetics, continuous sampling
from the collection flask was performed. The optimal temperature
and reactant flow were evaluated during the preliminary experi-
ments (Section 3.1). In all cases, a constant hydrogen flow of
10 mL/min was applied.
2.3. Product analysis
The reaction products were analyzed by means of a gas chroma-
tography (GC, Agilent Technologies, Model No. 7820A), equipped