3
Table 5. Catalyst recycling in carboxylative cyclization of the propargylic amine 1b with CO2.a,b
No. of run
Yield (%)c
1
68
2
74
3
78
4
79
5
81
6
80
7
81
8
81
9
79
10
80
11
81
12
80
13
78
14
77
15
76
a
Reaction conditions: 1b (4 mmol), MCM-41 (400 mg), toluene (5 mL; 0.8 M based on 1b), carried out at 110 ºC in a sealed autoclave for 10 h under
pressurized CO2.
b Pressurized with CO2 of 5.0 MPa at room temperature before heating to 110 ºC.
c Determined by the integration of 1H NMR absorptions with reference to an internal standard.
Table 4, entries 5 and 6, respectively). Only in these cases, the
corresponding 2-oxazolones 3e and 3f were also obtained in
slight chemical yields, respectively (Figure 1; 3e: 4%, 3f: 2%). 2-
Oxazolones 3e and 3f appeared to be obtained by the
tautomerization of the generated 2-oxazolidinones 2e and 2f,
respectively.10a,19 When we introduced the methyl group in R1,
the corresponding 2-oxazolidinone 2g was obtained in a low
chemical yield (6%, Table 4, entry 7).20 When a primary amine
1h was used as a substrate, the corresponding 2-oxazolidinone 2h
was not obtained (Table 4, entry 8).
Finally, the reusability of the MCM-41 catalyst was examined
by use of the N-methyl propargylic amine 1b, as shown in Table
5.21 In this experiment, it was found that the MCM-41 catalyst
was recovered by filtration of the reaction mixture, and could be
reused over ten times without deactivation to afford the
corresponding 2-oxazolidinone 2b in a fair chemical yield.
Figure 2 shows a proposed mechanism for the silica-catalyzed
carboxylative cyclization of the propargylic amine 1. First, the
propargylic amine 1 reacts with CO2 to form the corresponding
carbamic acid 4 in situ.8g,12b It is considered that the thus-obtained
carbamic acid 4 was activated by silica-surface OH– interaction
with the carbon–carbon triple bond, as shown in 5.22 Then, the
reaction, the MCM-41 catalyst was recovered by filtration and
could be reused over ten times without deactivation. We are
currently trying to apply a silica catalyst to other chemical
transformations of CO2. The results will be reported in due
course.
Acknowledgment
This work was based on results obtained from a project
(JPNP16010) commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial
Technology Development Organization (NEDO).
Supplementary Data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
in the online version , at http://
.
References and notes
1. Cuéllar-Franca, R. M.; Azapagic, A. J. CO2 Util. 2015, 9, 82–102.
2. (a) Bhanja, P.; Modak, A.; Bhaumik, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24,
7278–7297. (b) Xu, Y.; Lin, L.; Xiao, M.; Wang, S.; Smith, A. T.;
Sun, L.; Meng, Y. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 80, 163–182. (c)
Klankermayer, J.; Wesselbaum, S.; Beydoun, K.; Leitner, W.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7296–7343. (d) Liu, Q.; Wu, L.;
Jackstell, R.; Beller, M. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5933. (e)
Sakakura, T.; Choi, J.-C.; Yasuda, H. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107,
2365–2387.
corresponding 2-oxazolidinone
regeneration of silica.
2 was provided with the
3. (a) Dalpozzo, R.; Della Cá, N.; Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R.
Catalysts 2019, 9, 511. (b) Zhang, Z.; Ye, J.-H.; Wu, D.-S.; Zhou,
Y.-Q.; Yu, D.-G. Chem. Asian J. 2018, 13, 2292–2306. (c) Zhang,
H.; Liu, H.-B.; Yue, J.-M. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 883–898. (d)
Pulla, S.; Felton, C. M.; Ramidi, P.; Gartia, Y.; Ali, N.; Nasini, U.
B.; Ghosh, A. J. CO2 Util. 2013, 2, 49–57.
4. Arshadi, S.; Vessally, E.; Sobati, M.; Hosseinian, A.; Bekhradnia,
A. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 19, 120–129.
5. (a) Cao, C.-S.; Xia, S.-M.; Song, Z.-J.; Xu, H.; Shi, Y.; He, L.-N.;
Cheng, P.; Zhao, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8586–8593.
(b) Matsuo, H.; Fujii, A.; Choi, J.-C.; Fujitani, T.; Fujita, K.
Synlett 2019, 30, 1914–1918. (c) Sadeghzadeh, S. M.; Zhiani, R.;
Emrani, S. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 32, e3941. (d) Chang,
Z.; Jing, X.; He, C.; Liu, X.; Duan, C. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 1384–
1391.
Figure 2. Proposed mechanism of the silica-catalyzed
carboxylative cyclization of the propargylic amine 1.
6. Mitsudo, T.; Hori, Y.; Yamakawa, Y.; Watanabe, Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1987, 28, 4417–4418.
7. (a) Yoshida, M.; Mizuguchi, T.; Shishido, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2012,
18, 15578–15581. (b) Kikuchi, S.; Yoshida, S.; Sugawara, Y.;
Yamada, W.; Cheng, H.-M.; Fukui, K.; Sekine, K.; Iwakura, I.;
Ikeno, T.; Yamada, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2011, 84, 698–717.
(c) Yoshida, S.; Fukui, K.; Kikuchi, S.; Yamada, T. Chem. Lett.
2009, 38, 786–787.
8. (a) Fujita, K.; Inoue, K.; Sato, J.; Tsuchimoto, T.; Yasuda, H.
Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 1205–1212. (b) Sadeghzadeh, S. M. Appl.
Organometal. Chem. 2016, 30, 835–842. (c) Sadeghzadeh, S. M.
In summary, by employing only silica as a catalyst, the
carboxylative cyclization of propargylic amines with CO2
proceeded to afford the corresponding 2-oxazolidinones. MCM-
41, which was a mesoporous silica, was the most effective
catalyst for the reaction, providing a 2-oxazolidinone derivative
in a maximum chemical yield of 93%. Moreover, after the