The identification of protein targets of natural products
and other biologically active small molecules has been
traditionally pursued by affinity chromatography methods.
In this approach, a small molecule of interest is typically
immobilized on an insoluble support and treated with cellular
extracts. Noninteracting proteins can be washed from the
support, whereas specifically interacting proteins are retained,
enriched, and can be eluted with a specific competitor.
Peptide fragments of eluted proteins are analyzed by
sequencing, and this sequence information can be matched
with databases to identify genes encoding putative protein
targets. However, given the low abundance and low stability
of many proteins, this strategy can be quite technically
challenging.
Figure 1. Structures of novel (1) and previously reported (2) CIDs
that efficiently heterodimerize ER and SA proteins.
CIDs can be used to identify protein targets of natural
products by activating gene expression in living yeast
cells.18,19 In these yeast three hybrid systems, the natural
product is covalently linked to a cell-permeable ligand such
as the steroid dexamethasone.18,19 A receptor such as the
dexamethasone-binding glucocorticoid receptor is expressed
in yeast fused to a DNA binding domain (DBD). This DBD
(e.g., the bacterial LexA protein) anchors the receptor on
specific DNA sites of a reporter gene in the nucleus of yeast
cells. Addition of a cell-permeable CID results in binding
of the ligand element to the receptor and displays the linked
natural product to other target proteins expressed in yeast.
Genetic libraries (e.g., cDNA libraries) encoding tens of
thousands of potential target proteins each fused to a
transcriptional activation domain (AD, e.g., the B42 protein)
can be introduced and coexpressed in these recombinant
yeast. Because each yeast cell in theory expresses a unique
protein member of the library, yeast cells can be rapidly
screened to identify putative protein targets of the natural
product. Binding of a target-AD fusion protein to the natural
product displayed by the receptor-DBD fusion protein
reconstitutes a functional transcription factor by positioning
the AD in proximity of specific DNA sites of a reporter gene.
This transcription factor in turn recruits the cellular tran-
scriptional machinery to DNA to activate expression of a
reporter gene typically encoding a readily detected enzyme
such as â-galactosidase.21,22 A major potential advantage of
this genetic approach over affinity chromatography is the
ability to immediately sequence specific genes encoding
putative protein targets without requiring purification of
unstable protein products.
Estrone (7) is a high affinity ligand of estrogen receptor (ER)
proteins, and the appended natural product biotin provides
a simple model of complex natural products with unknown
protein targets. CID 1 resembles our previously reported
biotinylated 7R-substituted â-estradiol derivative 2, an ef-
ficient heterodimerizer of ERs with the biotin-binding protein
streptavidin (SA) in yeast three hybrid systems (Figure 2).23
Figure 2. Schematic of the ER/SA yeast three hybrid system
showing a previously reported23 model of a ternary ER-2-SA
complex. Heterodimerization of ER-LexA and SA-B42 by CIDs 1
or 2 activates expression of the lacZ (â-galactosidase) reporter gene.
Although 2 is an exceptionally active CID in yeast,23 the
routine use of 7R-substituted â-estradiol derivatives as CIDs
is limited by the lengthy 14-step synthesis required to prepare
We report here a simple two-pot synthesis of a novel,
highly active, and cell-permeable CID (1 Figure 1) compris-
ing an estrone (O-carboxymethyl)oxime linked to biotin.
23,24
these compounds.
As a dramatically streamlined alternative, a two-pot
synthesis of CID 1 and control compounds 3-5 (Figure 3),
is shown in Scheme 1. (O-Carboxymethyl)oxime derivatives
of estrone (7) and 6-ketoestradiol (9)25 were prepared in
quantitative yield from treatment with aminooxyacetic acid
(17) Carlson, J. C.; Kanter, A.; Thuduppathy, G. R.; Cody, V.; Pineda,
P. E.; McIvor, R. S.; Wagner, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1501-
1507.
(18) Licitra, E. J.; Liu, J. O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93,
12817-12821.
(19) Henthorn, D. C.; Jaxa-Chamiec, A. A.; Meldrum, E. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 2002, 63, 1619-1628.
(20) Becker, F.; Murthi, K.; Smith, C.; Come, J.; Costa-Rolda´n, N.;
Kaufmann, C.; Hanke, U.; Degenhart, C.; Baumann, S.; Wallner, W.; Huber,
A.; Dedier, S.; Dill, S.; Kinsman, D.; Hediger, M.; Bockovich, N.; Meier-
Ewert, S.; Kluge, A. F.; Nikolai, K. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 211-223.
(21) Rivera, V. M. Methods 1998, 14, 421-429.
(23) Hussey, S. L.; Muddana, S. S.; Peterson, B. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 3692-3693.
(24) Hussey, S. L.; He, E.; Peterson, B. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 415-
418.
(22) Pollock, R.; Clackson, T. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 459-
467.
(25) Mons, S.; Lebeau, L.; Mioskowski, C. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28,
213-218.
1410
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 9, 2004