practical and efficient synthetic strategies for the prepara-
tion of suitably protected AGE building blocks for incor-
poration into SPPS.
incorporation into SPPS has only been reported once,8
while the synthesis of a suitably protected pyrraline build-
ing block has not been reported. Importantly, the existing
syntheses of the CML and CEL Fmoc building blocks
required starting materials that are neither commercially
available nor easy to prepare, and yields for their prepara-
tion were not reported. Therefore, our principal aim was to
develop practical syntheses of suitably protected Fmoc
building blocks of CML, CEL and pyrraline and demon-
strate their use in automated microwave SPPS. The routes
were also designed to provide ready access to the free
amino acid forms of these important AGEs.
Here we report the synthesis of the three monolysyl AGEs,
Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (1) (CML), Nε-(carboxyethyl)-
lysine (2) (CEL), and pyrraline (3) (Figure 1) as both Fmoc-
protected building blocks suitable for SPPS and as free amino
acids. Furthermore, the AGE building blocks were readily
incorporated into 21 amino acid residue collagen model
peptide (CMP) sequences thus establishing their utility in
SPPS. The CMPs were subsequently shown to form triple
helices in solution demonstrating their potential as model
systems for investigating AGE-modified collagens.
Our strategy to prepare CML and CEL hinged on the use
of the nosyl (Ns) group alkylation methodology to alkylate
the ε-NH2 group of a lysine derivative.9 Additionally, it was
expected that the Ns group would also serve as an orthogonal
protecting group in SPPS. To facilitate the selective nosyla-
tion of the ε-NH2, the 9-BBN group was used to concomi-
tantly protect the R-NH2 and carboxylic acid group in
lysine.10 We envisaged that when used with other acid labile
protecting groups the BBN group would enable a final global
deprotection step to access the free amino acids while
providing a tractable organic compound prior to this. The
synthesis started with lysine hydrochloride 4, which was
treated with 9-BBN dimer affording BBN-lysine 5. The Ns
group was then introduced affording BBN-Ns-Lys 6 in 88%
yield over two steps. Alkylation of 6 with ethyl bromoacetate
or ethyl bromopropionate afforded compounds 7a (89%)
and 7b (91%), respectively. Selective deprotection of the
BBN-moiety was achieved by treatment of 7a and 7b with
4 M HCl/dioxane. Nonaqueous conditions were essential to
avoid concomitant hydrolysis of the ethyl ester. After re-
moval of the HCl/dioxane under reduced pressure, the crude
products were treated with Fmoc-Cl and K2CO3 in dioxane,
affording the desired Fmoc building blocks 8a and 8b ready
for incorporation into SPPS (Scheme 1).
Figure 1. Three monolysyl AGEs, CML, CEL, and pyrraline.
Although the synthesis of the free amino acid forms of
CML,5 CEL,5f,6 and pyrraline7 are well documented, the
majority of these approaches suffer from lengthy and
difficult procedures and/or poor yields. Furthermore, the
synthesis of CML and CEL as building blocks suitable for
(5) (a) Matsutani, H.; Kusumoto, S.; Koizumi, R.; Shiba, T. Phy-
tochemistry 1979, 18, 661. (b) Ahmed, M. U.; Thorpe, S. R.; Baynes,
J. W. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 4889. (c) Glomb, M. A.; Monnier, V. M.
J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 10017. (d) Baynes, J. W.; Dunn, J. A.; Knecht,
K. J.; Lyons, T. J.; McCance, D. R.; Macfarland, K. F. Diabetes 1991,
40, 190. (e) Grunwald, S.; Krause, R.; Bruch, M.; Henle, T.; Brandsch,
M. Br. J. Nutr. 2006, 95, 1221. (f) Hellwig, M.; Geissler, S.; Matthes, R.;
Peto, A.; Silow, C.; Brandsch, M.; Henle, T. ChemBioChem 2011, 12,
1270. (g) Andersen, J. M.; Hjelmgaard, T.; Dragsted, A. O.; Nielsen, J.
Synlett 2012, 23, 531. (h) Csuk, R.; Stark, S.; Barthel, A.; Kluge, R.;
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Fmoc-Protected CML and CEL
Building Blocks 8a and 8b
€
Strohl, D. Synthesis 2009, 1933. (i) Liardon, R.; Weck-Gaudard, D.;
Philippossian, G.; Finot, P.-A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1987, 35, 427. (j)
Delatour, T.; Fenaille, F.; Parisod, V.; Arce Vera, F.; Buetler, T. Amino
Acids 2006, 30, 25. (k) Pashikanti, S.; de Alba, D. R.; Boissonneault,
G. A.; Cervantes-Laurean, D. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2010, 48, 656. (l)
Takanashi, M.; Sakurai, T.; Tsuchiya, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40,
705. (m) Kihlberg, J.; Bergman, R.; Wickberg, B. Acta Chem. Scand. B.
1983, 37, 911.
(6) (a) Hellerman, E.; Coffey, D. S. J. Bio. Chem. 1967, 242, 582. (b)
Ahmed, M. U.; Brinkmann Frye, E.; Degenhardt, T. P.; Thorpe, S. R.;
Baynes, J. W. Biochem. J. 1997, 324, 565. (c) Fujioka, M.; Tanaka, M.
Eur. J. Biochem. 1978, 90, 297. (d) Effenberger, F.; Burkard, U. Liebigs
Ann. Chem. 1986, 334.
(7) (a) Nakayama, T.; Hayase, F.; Kato, H. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1980,
44, 1201. (b) Miller, R.; Olsson, K.; Pernemalm, P. A. Acta Chem. Scand.
Ser. B: Org. Chem. Biochem 1984, 38, 689. (c) Chiang, G. H. J. Agric.
Food Chem. 1988, 36, 506. (d) Potero-Otin, M.; Nagaraj, R. H.; Monnier,
V. M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1247, 74. (e) Hayase, F.; Nagaraj, R. H.;
Miyata, S.; Njoroge, F. G.; Monnier, V. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 363, 3758.
(f) Miller, R.; Olsson, K. Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B: Org. Chem. Biochem.
€
1985, 39, 717. (g) Schussler, U.; Ledl, F. Z. Lebensm.-Unters. Forsch. 1989,
189, 138. (h) Henle, T.; Bachmann, A. Z. Lebensm.-Unters. Forsch. 1996,
202, 72.
(8) Gruber, P.; Hofmann, T. J. Peptide Res. 2005, 66, 111.
(9) Kan, T.; Fukuyama, T. Chem. Commun. 2004, 353.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 22, 2012
5741