whereas dihydrofuran products were obtained with Mn(OAc)3
in acetic acid at 80 oC. While Hwu and co-workers examined
a number of variables in these reactions one point in their
discussion proposed that the diversity of the reactions came
from the reactivity difference between CAN and Mn(OAc)3,
where the latter is a weaker oxidant.
Scheme 2
The redox potentials of lanthanides are known to be
sensitive to the solvent milieu.12-14 Cyclic voltammetry (CV)
was utilized to determine the redox potential of CTAN in
CH3CN and CH2Cl2 to establish whether the chemoselectivity
was possibly due to different redox potentials of CTAN in
those two solvents. Figure 1 shows the CV data for CTAN
supposition that the more polar CH3CN stabilizes the â-silyl
cation through solvation providing a pathway to elimination.
Upon oxidation of the radical in the less polar CH2Cl2,
cyclization is favored through the proximity of a carbonyl
(in the absence of solvent stabilization) producing an oxo
stabilized cation.
The discussion in the preceding paragraphs focuses on the
effect of solvent on allylation vs addition-cyclization in
acyclic substrates 1-3 and 5 but does not address the absence
of this phenomenon in substrates 4 and 6. In the case of
substrate 4, addition of the allyltrimethylsilane and subse-
quent oxidation places the â-silyl cation in close proximity
to the carbonyls due to the restricted conformational flex-
ibility of the cyclic system. In this more ordered system it is
reasonable to expect less solvent dependence on the product
distribution. On the other hand, dihydrofuran formation after
addition of allyltrimethylsilane to oxidized 6 in both solvents
is somewhat more surprising. Initial rate studies on the
CTAN-mediated oxidative addition to 6 indicate an ordered
transition state, consistent with recent reported work,10 but
further studies are necessary to determine the underlying
mechanistic nuances of this reaction.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of CTAN at a glassy carbon
electrode in acetonitrile and CH2Cl2 vs Ag/AgNO3 reference
electrode.
in CH2Cl2 and CH3CN. The potentials (vs Ag/AgNO3) are
510 (20 and 540 (10 mV, respectively. While the CV of
CTAN in acetonitrile is nearly ideal (∆E of 67 mV),
inspection of the voltammogram for CTAN in CH2Cl2 is
clearly quasireversible with a ∆E of 180 mV. While the low
polarity of CH2Cl2 made the experiment somewhat more
difficult, the results of numerous determinations were
consistent and repeatable. The redox potential of CTAN in
CH2Cl2 was indeed lower by 30 mV (0.7 kcal/mol), but it is
unlikely that this small difference is responsible for the
change in chemoselectivity.
In conclusion, we have unraveled some interesting solvent-
dependent chemoselectivities of the CTAN-mediated oxida-
tive coupling of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds and allyltri-
methylsilane. Further work on the discreet mechanistic details
of the oxidation process in various solvents and the general
synthetic utility of this approach is currently being explored.
Since the oxidizing power of Ce(IV) is nearly the same
in CH3CN and CH2Cl2, the chemoselectivity does not arise
from solvent-induced changes in the thermodynamic redox
potential of the oxidant. Nonetheless, solvent must play a
role in determining the product distribution. During the
course of the reaction, the dicarbonyl substrate is oxidized
to produce a radical cation, which attacks the allyl trimethyl-
silane forming a â-silyl radical. Further oxidation of the
â-silyl radical produces a carbocation (Scheme 2). It is our
Acknowledgment. R.A.F. is grateful to the National
Science Foundation (CHE-0196163) for support of this work.
The Robert A. Welch Foundation is also acknowledged for
providing research support for Y.Z. We also thank Dr.
Rebecca S. Miller for her useful comments on the manu-
script.
Supporting Information Available: General methods,
electrochemical data, experimental protocols, and spectro-
scopic data. This material is available free of charge via the
(12) Shabangi, M.; Flowers, R. A., II Tetrahderon Lett. 1997, 38,
1137.
(13) Shabangi, M.; Sealy, J. M.; Fuchs, J. R.; Flowers, R. A., II
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998 39, 4429.
(14) Kuhlman, M. L.; Flowers, R. A., II Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
8049.
OL034763D
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 13, 2003
2365