Angewandte
Research Articles
Chemie
however here the Hill-slope proved to be lower than 1. We
anticipate that 15-LOX-1 inhibition by redox activity rather
than non-covalent interaction causes a dissimilarity between
both assays.
isoenzymes 12-LOX, 15-LOX-1, and 15-LOX-2 were local-
ized in both cytoplasm and nuclei of RAW264.7 and A549
cells, whereas the 5-LOX localization seemed to be restricted
to the nucleus. Some interesting observations were made.
First, in RAW264.7 cells, a relatively large amount of 12-LOX
was observed that could not be colocalized with Labelox B
labeling, whereas other LOX isoenzymes do also not seem to
accumulate in the cytoplasm (Figure 4a). This could indicate
a pool of inactive 12-LOX in the cytoplasm that disappears
upon LPS stimulation. Next, we observed a change in
localization of the LOX isoenzymes that was the clearest in
RAW264.7 macrophages. Upon stimulation, the localization
becomes more pronounced in the nuclear membrane and
remarkably also on distinct locations in the nucleus. This
staining pattern for LOX localization has been observed
before for 5-LOX in macrophages.[11] Importantly, the change
in localization of all LOX isoenzymes colocalized with
a change in activity-based LOX labeling with probe Labelox
B (Figure 4). This indicates that the LOX isoenzymes are
activated at the nuclear membranes as described in literature
before.[11,24] However, LOX enzyme activity at distinct
nuclear localizations have not been described before. We
were intrigued by this finding and set out to rationalize the
LOX localization in the nucleus.
Subsequently, we employed the ABP-based ELISA assay
for cellular lipoxygenase enzymes by the use of isoenzyme
selective antibodies to study the inhibitory potency of lip-
oxygenase inhibitors. The results indicate that PD146176
inhibited 5-LOX, 12-LOX, and 15-LOX-1 with IC50 values of
around 17 mM, while 15-LOX-2 has an IC50 greater than
100 mM (Figure 3C, left). The Hill-slope for inhibition of 5-
LOX, 12-LOX and 15-LOX-1 by PD146176 is one (Table S1),
which suggests that binding between PD146176 and these
isoenzymes is a 1:1 binding event. The IC50 and Hill-slope for
PD146176 mediated inhibition of cellular 15-LOX-1 activity
is similar to that of recombinant 15-LOX-1 (IC50 = 15 mM).
Furthermore, this analysis indicated that PD146176 inhibited
ABP labeling of 5-LOX, 12-LOX, and 15-LOX-1 with equal
potency, whereas the ABP labeling of 15-LOX-2 is much less
affected. This indicates that PD146176 is selective among 15-
LOX-1 and 15-LOX-2 but not among 5-LOX, 12-LOX, and
15-LOX-1. In contrast to PD146176, Baicalein has less
influence on ABP-labeling of cellular 15-LOX-1 compared
to recombinant 15-LOX-1 and no selectivity among the
cellular LOX enzymes was observed (Figure 3C, middle).
This might be caused by the redox inhibitory mechanism,
which might be less effective in a cellular context in
comparison to the recombinant enzyme. For the 5-LOX
inhibitor, Zileuton,[23] we found inhibition of 5-LOX and 12-
LOX at high micromolar concentrations, whereas little or no
effect on 15-LOX-1 and 15-LOX-2 was observed(Figure 3C,
right). Thus the ABP-based assay enables determination of
the potency and selectivity of inhibitors among the endoge-
nous lipoxygenase isoenzymes.
Lipopolysaccharide stimulates nuclear LOX accumula-
tion. The ability of probe Labelox B to perform activity-based
labeling of endogenous LOX isoenzymes in mammalian cells
(Figure 2c) motivated us to investigate the utility to localize
cellular LOX activity using fluorescence microscopy. In this
study we note however, that we can not exclude the possibility
that Labelox B also labels non-LOX proteins and therefore
we refer in this part to putatively active LOX. By comparing
immunostaining of LOX isoenzymes with activity-based
labeling of total LOX activity, we aimed to gain more insight
in cellular localizations of LOX activity. Previously, it has
been shown that LOX isoenzymes are distributed over
cytoplasm and nuclei.[11,24–26] LOX enzyme activity has been
described to occur mainly on the nuclear membrane, where
arachidonic acid is released to act as a substrate for LOX
mediated oxygenation. Here, we investigated how the local-
ization and activation of cellular lipoxygenases changes under
the influence of lipopolysaccharide(LPS) as a stimulus in
RAW 264.7 macrophages and in A549 cells. We employed
confocal microscopy to colocalize active LOXs labeled with
Labelox B and LOX isoenzymes labeled by immunostaining.
The confocal pictures demonstrated that LOX antibody-
and Labelox B labeled LOXs were mainly colocalized,
suggesting that Labelox B was sufficient to visualize active
LOXs in living cells. Under non-stimulated conditions, the
15-LOX-1 has a bromodomain-like region that binds to
acetylated histones. In our search for a physiological explan-
ation for the distinct nuclear localization of LOX isoenzymes,
we focused on 15-LOX-1. The primary sequence of 15-LOX-
1 was analyzed for epigenetic reader domains based on the
presumption that chromatin binding could explain the distinct
nuclear localization of 15-LOX-1. We identified the consen-
sus motifs for
a bromodomain, Nx2or3D(E)x2or3Y(A/
V),[27–29] in the primary structure of 15-LOX-1. This bromo-
domain consensus sequence is also found in other bromodo-
main containing proteins, such as bromodomain and extra
terminal domain (BET) and histone acetyltransferase (HAT)
family members (Figure 5a, lower part). Such consensus
residues are also conserved in 15-LOX-1 across mammalian
species (Figure 5a, upper part). Among these residues,
asparagine is the most essential as it directly interacts with
acetylated lysine residues on histones.[27–29] Based on this
sequence analysis, we hypothesized that 15-LOX-1 binds to
histones depending on their acetylation level. Therefore, we
prepared two histone extractions with different levels of total
acetylation. Highly acetylated histones were extracted from
A549 cells treated with inhibitor CI994, a histone deacetylase
inhibitor, whereas lowly acetylated histones were prepared
from A549 cells treated with A485, a histone acetyltransfer-
ase inhibitor. An ELISA-binding assay demonstrated that
histones with higher acetylation levels had increased 15-LOX-
1 binding compared to histones with lower acetylation levels,
thus supporting the hypothesis that recombinant 15-LOX-
1 binds acetylated histones (Figure 5b). Moreover, confocal
microscope pictures showed that LOX labeling with probe
Labelox B colocalized with both acetylated H3 and H4
(Figure 5c,d). Upon LPS stimulation, more active LOXs were
recruited to acetylated H3 and H4, especially at the inner
nuclear envelope area (Figure 5c,d, white arrows). Further-
more, a microarray with acetylated histone H3 peptides was
&&&&
ꢀ 2021 The Authors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 2 – 11
These are not the final page numbers!