Y.-F. Zhao, et al.
Steroids 155 (2020) 108557
Fig. 2. Key HMBC and NOESY correlations of compounds 1 and 2.
according to the two proton signals of δ
H
4.08 (m, 1H) and 3.38 (d, 1H,
J = 10.8 Hz) of C-26, the 25S configuration was deduced [23]. In
5.31)/C-2′ (δ
C
82.32). Thus, the structure of compound 2 was de-
termined as 24-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(24S,25R)-3β, 24β-dihydroxy-5β-
addition, the 25S configuration could also be confirmed by δ
C
16.70 (C-
spirostane-3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1
named tiomosaponin W.
→
2)-β-D-galactopyranoside,
27) [24]. Therefore, the aglycone of compound 1 was determined as
(
25S)-5β-spirostane-3β-ol.
It has been reported that the sugars linked to the steroidal saponins
in A. asphodeloides are mainly glucose, galactose, mannose, and xylose.
In this study, the compound 1 was isolated for the first time from A.
asphodeloides. Moreover, the particulary glycosylation at C-24 on the
ring F observed for compound 2 is noteworthy.
The compounds (1–9) were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxic activ-
ities against MCF-7 and HepG2 cell lines (Table2), and paclitaxel was
used as positive control. The results showed that compounds 1 and 6
exhibited significant cytotoxic activities against MCF-7 and HepG2 cell
The HMBC correlations H-1′ (δ
H
4.95)/C-3 (δ
C
75.25); H-1″ (δ
H
5
.77)/C-2′(δ
C
77.02) and H-1‴ (δ
H
6.35)/C-2″ (δ 79.79) confirmed the
C
sequence of the sugar chain at C-3. So, the attachment sequence of the
sugar chain at C-3 was elucidated to be α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-
D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-D-galactopyranoside. Thus, the structure of
compound 1 was determined as (25S)-5β-spirostane-3β-ol-3-O- α-L-
rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-D-galactopyr-
anoside, named tiomosaponin V.
Compound 2 was obtained as a white powder. Its HR-ESI–MS
showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 917.4757 [M−H] , (calcd
lines, with IC50 values ranging from 2.01
±
0.19 μM to
−
2.22 0.25 μM. Compound 4 showed a good cytotoxic activity
±
for C45
unsaturation. The H NMR spectrum of compound 2 (Table 1) displayed
4.93 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, H-1′), 5.06
1H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-1‴) and 5.31 (1H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-1″); two
H
73
O
19 is 917.4752, −0.54 ppm) indicating nine degrees of
against HepG2 cells with an IC50 values of 13.98 ± 0.43 μM. Com-
pounds 3, 5, 7, 8, and 9 showed moderate cytotoxic activities against
HepG2 cells with IC50 values below 65 μM. Compound 2 was inactive
toward the two cell lines with IC50 > 100 μM. Comparing the cyto-
toxicity of compounds 1, 2, and 4, it indicated that the aglycon struc-
ture, the type of monosaccharide and the position of sugar moiety have
an effect on the activity. Compounds 3, 5, 7, and 8 showed lower cy-
totoxicities than compounds 1, 4, and 6, which suggested that the cy-
totoxicity of spirostanol saponins is stronger than that of saponins
without F-ring.
1
three anomeric proton signals at δ
H
(
H
angular methyl signals at δ 0.77 (3H, s, H-18) and 0.98 (3H, s, H-19);
H
two doublet signals at δ 1.12 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, H-21) and 1.34 (3H,
1
3
d, J = 7.1 Hz, H-27). The C NMR spectrum of compound 2 (Table 1)
101.58 (C-1‴), 102.99 (C-
′) and 106.59 (C-1″); four methyl carbon signals at δ 16.95 (C-18),
4.40 (C-19), 15.13 (C-21) and 10.32 (C-27). The observations above
showed three anomeric carbon signals at δ
C
1
2
C
suggested that compound 2 was a steroidal glycoside with three sugar
moieties. Acid hydrolysis and HPLC analysis of compound 2 gave D-
glucose and D-galactose and the relative ratio was 2:1. The β-config-
uration of the galactose and glucose were determined according to the
4
. Conclusion
In conclusion, two novel steroidal saponins 1 and 2 together with
3
coupling constants ( J1,2 > 7 Hz) of the anomeric protons. Comparing
seven known steroidal saponins were isolated from the rhizomes of
the NMR data of compound 2 with timosaponin A III [18], it displayed
similarity except for variation at the ring F. These indicated that the
hydroxyl group attached to C-24. In addition, the conclusion was fur-
Table 2
a
The cytotoxic activities of compounds 1–9. (IC50/μM.)
ther confirmed by the HMBC correlations from H-26a (δ
73.24) and H-27 (δ 1.34) to C-24 (δ 73.24). The NOESY corre-
lations of H-24 (δ 4.84)/H-26b (δ 3.95) suggested that H-24 was a-
H
3.53) to C-24
Compounds
Cell lines
(
δ
C
H
C
H
H
MCF-7
HepG2
oriented (Fig. 2). Therefore, the hydroxyl group at C-24 was β-oriented,
and the stereochemistry of C-24 was determined as S. Moreover, the
data of ring F was consistent with literature [25], which can be proved
that absolute configuration of C-25 is R-configuration. Therefore, the
aglycone of compound 2 was elucidated as (24S, 25R)-5β-spirostane-3β,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.16 ± 0.19
> 100
> 100
> 100
> 100
2.05 ± 0.12
> 100
> 100
> 100
6.92 ± 0.82
2.01 ± 0.19
> 100
61.91 ± 2.60
13.98 ± 0.43
56.28 ± 3.91
2.22 ± 0.25
35.75 ± 3.98
42.22 ± 3.42
45.71 ± 4.22
4.71 ± 0.56
2
4β-diol.
The connectivity of the sugar chain was deduced based on the
HMBC correlations. Firstly, the HMBC cross-peaks between H-1‴ (δ
.06) and C-24 (δ 73.24) indicated a glucosyl residue attached to C-24.
Moreover, the linkages of the sugar units at C-3 were ascertained from
the HMBC correlations H-1′ (δ 4.93)/C-3 (δ 75.89) and H-1″ (δ
H
b
5
C
Paclitaxel (nM)
a
IC50 valve based on triplicate five points, presented as the mean ± S.D.
H
C
H
b
Positive control.
4