6738
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6738-6739
Homochiral G-Quadruplexes with Ba2+ but Not with
+
K : The Cation Programs Enantiomeric
Self-Recognition
Xiaodong Shi, James C. Fettinger, and Jeffery T. Davis*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
UniVersity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
ReceiVed December 27, 2000
In biological and synthetic systems, noncovalent interactions
often control formation of assemblies from multiple components,
and the thermodynamically favored structure can vary with
changes in the building blocks, template, or environmental
Figure 1. (A) A side view of the crystal structure of the G-quadruplex
formed from (D)-G 1 and Ba2 picrate. The picrate counterions are deleted
+
1
conditions. Some intriguing examples of this dynamic equilibrium
2
for clarity. (B) Four G-quartets, G
4
4
1-G 4, make up the G-quadruplex.
shifting involve formation of homochiral assemblies from racemic
The two Ba2 cations are indicated, as are the picrate hydrogen bonds
+
ligands.3 Enantiomeric self-recognition of nucleosides is par-
,4
4 4
with the amino N2 HB proton of G 2 and G 3.
5
6
ticularly interesting, since the genetic material is homochiral.
We report that cations of similar size, but of different charge,
promote formation of stereoisomeric assemblies from the same
racemic nucleoside. Specifically, (D,L)-5′-silyl-2′,3′-O-isopro-
pylidene guanosine (G 1) forms homochiral aggregates in the
Scheme 1
2+
presence of Ba picrate but gives heterochiral diastereomers when
+
K is the guest (Scheme 1).
Guanosine derivatives self-associate in the presence of cations
7
to form hydrogen-bonded G-quartets. Individual G-quartets stack
+
to give G
8
-M sandwiches and higher-ordered G-quadruplexes.
+
+
8-10
Besides K and Na , G-quadruplexes also bind divalent cations.
Since octacoordinate K+ (r ) 1.51 Å) and Ba (r ) 1.42 Å)
2+
11
+
have similar ionic radii, we reasoned that comparing the K
and Ba2 complexes formed from G 1 would reveal how the
+
12
cation’s charge affects G-quadruplex structure and dynamics.
While studying ligand exchange, we discovered that Ba2+ picrate
directs enantiomeric self-recognition of (D,L)-G 1 (Scheme 1). In
this case, the divalent cation and the picrate anion cooperate to
enable chiral resolution of (D,L)-G 1 on the supramolecular level.
First, we confirmed that Ba2 picrate templates G-quadruplex
formation. NMR integration showed that (D)-G 1 extracted Ba2
linked by four picrate anions that hydrogen bond to the “inner”
G-quartets (Figure 1). NMR mixing experiments using [(D)-G 1]16
[BaPic ] and the isomorphous [(D)-G 1]16‚2[SrPic ] indicated
that the M G-quadruplexes retain the hexadecamer structure in
CD Cl and that the picrate anions stabilize this hexadecamer in
solution. The only significant difference between the X-ray
‚
2
2
2
2+
+
2
2
+
14
picrate from water into CD
complex with 8 equiv of nucleoside bound to each Ba picrate.
] indicated that 16 units
2
Cl
2
to give a hydrogen-bonded
2+
+
15
structures of the Ba and K G-quadruplexes is the cation
2+
+
occupancy. For the K G-quadruplex, a cation is present between
A crystal structure of [(D)-G 1]16‚2[BaPic
2
each G-quartet, raising the possibility that charge-charge
2+
of G 1 associate around two Ba cations to give a complex with
+
repulsion between adjacent cations might destabilize the K
G-quadruplex relative to the Ba G-quadruplex. For the Ba
four G-quartet layers.13 This lipophilic G-quadruplex is composed
2+
2+
2+
of two coaxially stacked C
Within an octamer, sugar-nucleobase hydrogen bonds connect
the 5′-ribose oxygen of the “inner” G-quartet with the N amino
‚Ba2 octamers are
4 8
-symmetric octamers, [(D)-G 1] ‚Ba .
complex, the divalent cations are sandwiched within individual
octamers, and there is no cation located between the “inner” two
G-quartets.
2
+
group of the “outer” G-quartet. The [(D)-G 1]
8
Although structurally similar, the Ba2 G-quadruplex is
+
+
(
1) (a) Hasenknopf, B.; Lehn, J. M.; Boumediene, N.; Dupont-Gervais, A.;
thermodynamically and kinetically more stable than the K
van Dorsselaer, A.; Kniesel, B.; Fenske, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
G-quadruplex. For example, the picrate anion binds more strongly
1
0956-10962. (b) Calama, M. C.; Timmerman, P.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Angew.
2
+
to the G-quadruplex filled with divalent cations. For the Ba
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 755-758. (c) Hof, F.; Nuckolls, C.; Rebek, J., Jr.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4251-4252.
1
system, separate picrate H NMR signals were observed for an
equimolar mixture of [(D)-G 1]16‚2[BaPic ] (δ ) 8.99 ppm) and
free” anion (δ ) 8.71 ppm) in CD Cl (Supporting Information
Figure 4). In contrast, a time-averaged NMR signal (δ ) 8.85
ppm) for a 1:1 mixture of [(D)-G 1]16‚4[Kpic] and solvated picrate
indicated faster anion exchange between the K G-quadruplex
(
2) (a) Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2455-2463. (b) Cousins, G. R.
2
L.; Poulsen, S. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 270-
79.
3) (a) Masood, M. A.; Enemark, E. J.; Stack, T. D. P. Angew. Chem., Int.
“
2
2
2
16
(
Ed. 1998, 37, 928-932. (b) Kondo, T.; Oyama, K.; Yoshida, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 894-897.
+
(
4) (a) Prins, L. J.; Huskens, J.; de Jong, F.; Timmerman, P.; Reinhoudt,
D. N. Nature 1999, 398, 498-502. (b) Prins, L. J.; de Jong, F.; Timmerman,
P.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Nature 2000, 408, 181-184.
(13) Crystal data for [(D)-G 1)]16‚2Ba2+(picrate)
) 8888.18, crystal dimensions 0.515 × 0.255 ×
0.161 mm , tetragonal, space group I4, a ) 30.780 Å, b ) 30.780 Å, c )
4 2 3 6
‚(H O)11‚(CH CN) : C352.76
(
5) Shi, X. D.; Fettinger, J. C.; Cai, M.; Davis, J. T. Angew. Chem., Int.
2 104 r
H562 Ba N O119Si16; M
3
Ed. 2000, 39, 3124-3127.
3
(
6) Feringa, B. L.; van Delden, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
418-3438.
7) Guschlbauer, W.; Chantot, J. F.; Thiele, D. J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam.
25.831(5) Å, R ) 90°, â ) 90°, γ ) 90°, V ) 24 472(6) Å , Z ) 2, D )
x
3
-1
3
1.206 mg/m , u(Mo KR) ) 0.283 mm . Data were collected on a Bruker
(
SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer at 193(2) K. Structure determination was
1
9
1
990, 8, 491-511.
done by direct methods using the program XS. Refinement, using the XL
20 2 2
(
(
(
8) Chen, F. M. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 3769-3776.
9) Smirnov, I.; Shafer, R. H. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 296, 1-5.
10) Kotch, F. W., Fettinger, J. C.; Davis, J. T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3277-
program, was done to convergence on F with R(F) ) 9.94% and wR(F ) )
22.03% for all 15 958 independent reflections.
(14) Shi, X. D.; Fettinger, J. C.; Davis, J. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001.
In press.
3
280.
(
(
11) Shannon, R. D. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1976, 32, 751-767.
12) Tohl, J.; Eimer W. Biophys Chem. 1997, 67, 177-186.
(15) Forman, S. L.; Fettinger, J. C.;Pieraccini, S.; Gottarelli, G.; Davis, J.
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4060-4067.
1
0.1021/ja004330v CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/13/2001