(quantitative analysis) and GC-MS, 1H NMR 13C NMR and IR analysis
amount of other unidentified products increased when 9 MPa
CO was charged in the autoclave.
(identification of products).
2
The oxygen pressure also affected the conversion and
selectivity. Lower oxygen pressure (0.1 MPa) gave satisfactory
conversion but the selectivity to 2 was never higher than 93.4%.
The best selectivity (over 96%) was obtained as the oxygen
pressure was elevated to 1.0 MPa. Using ethyl acrylate as the
substrate, the reaction affords similar results, and the further
experiments are now in progress.
In summary, the oxidation reaction of methyl acrylate
afforded the acetal in high conversion and selectivity at lower
temperature when supercritical carbon dioxide instead of DME
was used as the reaction medium without the presence of
1 D. G. Crosby and R. V. Berthold, J. Org. Chem., 1962, 27, 3083.
2 J. P. Collman, A. O. Chong, G. B. Jameson, R. T. Oakley, E. Rose, E. R.
Schmittou and J. A. Ibers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 516.
3
M. Israel, E. C. Zoll, N. Muhammad and E. J. Modest, J. Med. Chem.,
973, 16, 1.
1
4
G. B u¨ chi, J. A. Carlson, J. E. Powell, Jr. and L.-F. Tiztze, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1973, 95, 504.
5
6
For a comprehensive review, see: J. Tsuji, Synthesis, 1984, 369.
(a) T. Hosokawa, S. Aoki and S.-I. Murahashi, Synthesis, 1992, 558; (b)
T. Hosokawa, T. Ohta, S. Kanayama and S.-I. Murahashi, Synthesis,
1992, 558; (b) T. Hosokawa, T. Ohta, S. Kanayama and S.-I. Murahashi,
J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52, 1758.
2 2
HMPA. The pressure of CO and O had a remarkable effect on
the conversion and selectivity.
The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science
Foundation of China for financial support of this work
7 For discussions of the advantages of scCO
Bartle, Chem. Ind., 1996, 449; M. Poliakoff and S. Howdle, Chem. Ber.,
995, 31, 118; H. Black, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1996, 30, 124A.
2
, see T. Clifford and K.
1
8
D. A. Morgenstern, R. M. LeLacheur, D. K. Morita, S. L. Borokowsky,
S. Feng, G. H. Brown, L. Luan, M. F. Gross, M. J. Burk and W. Tumas,
ACS Symp. Ser., 1996, 626, 132.
(29772036) and Dr Fangl u¨ Huang for helpful discussions.
Notes and references
9 J. W. Rathke, R. J. Klinger and T. R. Krause, Organometallics, 1991,
1
0, 1350; P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Nature, 1994, 368,
†
Typical procedure: Reactions were carried out in a HF-25 autoclave. PdII
catalyst (0.15 mmol, 3 mol%), CuCl (4 mmol), MeOH (1 ml, 24.7 mmol)
and acrylate ester (5 mmol) were added into a 25 ml autoclave in sequence.
and then liquid CO were pumped into the autoclave using a cooling
2
31.
2
1
1
0 M. A. Carroll and A. B. Holmes, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1395.
1 M. J. Burk, S. Feng, M. F. Gross and W. Tumas, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
O
2
2
1
995, 117, 8277.
pump to give the desired pressure. The autoclave was then put into an oil
bath under magnetic stirring for the desired reaction time. After the reaction,
the autoclave was allowed to cool to 230 °C. CO was vented and the
2
surplus was extracted with n-hexane. The extract was filtrated and
condensed under reduced pressure. The product was analyzed using GC
1
1
2 L. Jia, H. Jiang and J. Li, Green Chem., 1999, 91.
3 J. Tsuji, H. Nagashima and H. Nemoto, Org. Synth., 1984, 62, 9.
Communication 9/01935I
986
Chem. Commun., 1999, 985–986