4
218 Shah et al.
Asian J. Chem.
TABLE-1
ELECTRONIC SPECTRAL DATA OF
REFERENCES
COMPOUNDS 2-HYDROXY SCHIFF BASE
1. A.N. Papadopoulos, C.P. Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, A.G. Hatzidimitriou,
A. Gourdon and D.P. Kessisoglou, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans, 2591
(1995).
n-Hexane
DMF
Molar
coefficient
Compound
λmax (nm) λmax (nm)
2
3
4
.
.
.
F.S. Kamounah, S.R. Salman and A.A.K. Mahmoud, Spectrosc. Lett.,
1, 1557 (1998).
M. Sakamato, Y. Nishida, K. Ohhara, Y. Sadaoka, A. Matsumato and
H. Okawa, Polyhedron, 14, 2505 (1995).
Bis-(ortho-
hydroxylbenzaldehyde)
,2-phenylenediimine
240
285
310
220
270
300
265
315
355
430
66560
91520
33280
52140
56880
53720
44240
78400
88200
56840
26650
106680
111760
58420
50800
3
1
195
265
296
412
S.R. Salman and N.A. Saleh, Spectrosc. Lett., 30, 1289 (1997).
Bis-(ortho-
hydroxylnaphthaldehyde)
,2-phenylenediimine
5. Z. Popovic, V. Roje, G. Pavlovic, D. Matkovic-Calogovic and G.
Giester, J. Mol. Struct., 597, 39 (2001).
6. S.R. Salman, S.H. Shawkat and G.M. Al-Obaidi, Spectrsc. Lett., 31,
221 (1998).
7. S. Shasad, S.D. Gleb, D.T. Michael and L. Hans-Heinrich, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 128, 3379 (2006).
1
220
260
310
340
Bis-(ortho-
hydroxylbenzaldehyde)
-aminophenylether
226
265
305
4
8
.
H. Nazir, M.Yildiz, H.Yilmaz, M.N. Tahir and D. Ulku, J. Mol. Struct.,
24, 241 (2000).
T. Hokelek, N. Akduran, M.Yildiz and Z. Kilic, Anal. Sci., 16, 553 (2000).
5
234
312
375
415
230
290
380
430
Bis-(ortho-
9.
hydroxylnaphthaldehyd)
-aminophenylether
10. M. Rospenk, I. Król-Starzomska and A. Filarowski, Chem. Phys., 287,
4
113 (2003).
1
1. H. Unver, M.Yildiz, D.M. Zengin, S. Zbey and E. Kendi, J. Chem.
Crystallogr., 31, 211 (2002).
As a proton donor, the solvent interacts with the non-bonding
electron pair of the azomethine nitrogen. Thus, it may be
assumed that, in those Schiff base derivatives where a non-
bonding electron pair is no longer available, a solvent effect
will not be observed.
The spectroscopic data suggest that these compounds exist
mainly in the enol-imine form in solid state for o-hydroxy-
benzaldehyde compounds and a mixture of enol and the keto
form for o-hydroxynaphthaldehyde compound.
12. S.H.Alarcón, D. Pagani, J. Bacigalupo andA.C. Olivieri, J. Mol. Struct.,
75, 233 (1999).
4
1
3. H. Joshi, F.S. Kamounah, G. van der Zwan, C. Gooijer and L. Antonov,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. II, 12, 2303 (2001).
1
4. R. Harzfeld and P. Nagy, Spectrosc. Lett., 32, 57 (1999).
15. R. Herzfeld and P. Nagy, Curr. Org. Chem., 5, 373 (2001).
1
6. H. Joshi, F.S. Kamounah, C. Gooijer, G. van der Zwan and L. Antonov,
J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 152, 183 (2002).
1
7. M. Gavranic, B. Kaitner and E. Mestrovic, J. Chem. Crystallogr., 26,
23 (1996).
18. H. Ünver, D.M. Zengin and K. Güven, J. Chem. Crystallogr., 30, 359 (2000).
1
2
2
9. T. Dziembowska, Z. Rozwadowski, A. Filarowski and P.E. Hansen,
Magnatic Resonance Chem., 39, 67 (2001).
0. L. Antonov, M.F. Fabian, D. Nedeltcheva and F.S. Kamounah, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. II, 1173 (2000).
1. G.J.M. Fernández, F. del Rio-Portilla, B. Quiroz-García, R.A. Toscano
and R. Salcedo, J. Mol. Struct., 561, 197 (2001).
Conclusion
On the basis of spectroscopic data, the o-hydroxy Schiff
bases or derivatives have a course of an additional role in the
process, which played by intramolecular hydrogen bonding.
In contrast with the formation of keto form, the possibility of
enol form is raised in all compounds because when a mole-
cule pass from keto to enol then a H- bonding exist which
make it more stable. And the compound o-hydroxynaphth-
aldehyde have a mixture of keto-enol forms in both polar and
non-polar solvents.
22. S.D. Chatziefthimiou, Y.G. Lazarou, E. Hagjoudis, T. Dziembowska
and I.M. Mavridis, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110, 23701 (2006).
2
2
2
3. J. Zawadiak and M. Mrzyczek, Spectrochim. Acta A, 75, 925 (2010).
4. D. Yanagissawa and N. Shirai, Biomaterial, 31, 4179 (2010).
5. S. Samal, R.R. Das, D. Sahoo, S.Acharya, R.L. Panda and R.C. Rout,
J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 62, 1437 (1996).