K. Hinterding et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 8463–8465
8465
References
Leijonmarck, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1983,
1097–1098.
1. O’Hagan, D. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1995, 12, 1–32.
2. Dutton, C. J.; Banks, B. J.; Cooper, C. B. Nat. Prod.
Rep. 1995, 12, 165–181.
3. Tanaka, H.; Kuroda, A.; Marusawa, H.; Hatanaka, H.;
Kino, T.; Goto, T.; Hashimoto, M.; Taga, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5031–5033.
4. (a) Vezina, C.; Kudelski, A.; Sehgal, S. N. J. Antibiot.
1975, 28, 721–726; (b) Sehgal, S. N.; Baker, H.; Vezina,
C. J. Antibiot. 1975, 28, 727–732.
12. This result is remarkable in the light of Branda¨nges
findings (see Ref. 9). In a related experiment using a
Norephedrin-derived oxazolidinone he observed predomi-
nant attack at the endo-carbonyl function, yielding the
11-membered ring structure. Subtle effects of substituents
on the oxazolidinone therefore seem to govern the course
of the reaction.
5. (a) Sanglier, J. J.; Quesniaux, V.; Fehr, T.; Hofmann, H.;
Mahnke, M.; Memmert, K.; Schuler, W.; Zenke, G.;
Gschwind, L.; Maurer, C.; Schilling, W. J. Antibiot. 1999,
52, 466–473; (b) Fehr, T.; Kallen, J.; Oberer, L.; Sanglier,
J. J.; Schilling, W. J. Antibiot. 1999, 52, 474–479.
6. Evans, D. A. Aldrichim. Acta 1982, 15, 23–32.
7. Raimundo, B. C.; Heathcock, C. H. Synlett 1995, 1213–
1214.
8. For detailed information on this topic, see: Braun, M. In
Stereoselective Synthesis (Houben-Weyl); Helmchen, G.;
Hoffmann, R. W.; Mulzer, J.; Schaumann, E., Eds.;
Thieme: Stuttgart, 1996; Vol. E21b, pp. 1603–1666.
9. Branda¨nge, S.; Leijonmarck, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
33, 3025–3028.
13. K-Selectride and DIBAH led to enolization, LiBH4 and
NaBH4 in solvents such as MeOH, THF to complex
reaction mixtures detected by TLC, while the use of
Me3N-BH3 gave no conversion.
14. Experimental procedure: To a stirred solution of ketone 5
(35 mg, 0.22 mmol) in MeOH (2 ml) was added at −5°C
a solution of t-BuNH2-BH3 (62 mg, 0.67 mmol) in
MeOH (2 ml), immediately followed by a 1 M solution of
citric acid in water (1.6 ml). After 2.5 h at −5°C, CH2Cl2
(15 ml) and water (5 ml) were added. Layers were sepa-
rated and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2
(3×10 ml). After drying with MgSO4 and concentration
of the organic layer, chromatography (ethylacetate/hex-
ane=2/1) yielded 26 mg (0.16 mmol, 73%) of a colorless
10. Prepared according to Ref. 7.
11. Experimental procedure: A solution of acetate 4 (1.2 g,
3.2 mmol) in THF (25 ml) was added at −78°C to a
stirred solution of LiHMDS (1 M in THF, 9.6 ml, 9.6
mmol) in THF (20 ml). After stirring for 3 h, the reaction
mixture was quenched at −78°C by the addition of satd
NH4Cl/MeOH/H2O (100 ml, 1/1/1, v/v/v). Ethylacetate
(100 ml) and water (30 ml) were added and the layers
separated. The organic phase contained the chiral auxil-
iary in quantitative yield and 90% purity. The aqueous,
basic layer (pH 9–10) was titrated with 0.3N HCl to pH
2–3 and then extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×100 ml). Drying
with MgSO4 and concentration of the organic layer
yielded the product as an off-white solid in quantitative
yield and 90% purity. Chromatography (ethylacetate/hex-
ane=1/2) gave pure 5 as a white solid (485 mg, 3.1 mmol,
95%): Rf=0.35 in ethylacetate/hexane=1/2 mp: 78–79°C;
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): l=1.12 ppm (t, J=7 Hz,
1
oil. Rf=0.21 in ethylacetate/hexane=1/1; H NMR (500
MHz, DMSO): l=0.90 ppm (d, J=7.4 Hz, 3H,
CHCH
6
3), 0.94 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3
6 ), 1.47 (m, 2H,
CH2CH3), 1.70 (m, 1H, CH
6
6
CH3), 2.25 (dd, J=6.4 Hz,
J=16.5 Hz, 1H, CH2CO), 2.78 (dd, J=5.6 Hz, J=16.5
Hz, 1H, CH2CO), 3.60 (m, 1H, CHOCO), 3.85 (ddd,
J=2.9 Hz, J=7.6 Hz, J=10.4 Hz, 1H, CH6 OH), 5.12 (d,
J=4.7 Hz, 1H, OH); MS (ES+): 159 (MH+), 141 (M+−
H2O), 129 (M+−C2H5), 116, 87, 58; HRMS calcd for
C8H14O3+OH 175.0970, found 175.0971; IR: 3430 (m,
OH), 2971, 2937, 2883 (m, CH), 1729 (s, lacton CO),
1462 (m), 1379, 1360 (m), 1250 (s, lacton CO), 1190,
1098, 1042, 999 (m); [h]2D5=+41.9, c=8 mg/ml in Et2O.
15. Bennett, F.; Fenton, G.; Knight, D. W. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 5147–5158.
3H, CH2CH3
(ddq, J=8 Hz, 1H, CH
J=8 Hz, 1H, CH2CH3), 2.43 (dq, J=10 Hz, J=7 Hz,
1H, CHCH3), 3.45 (d, J=19 Hz, 1H, CH2CO), 3.56 (d,
J=19 Hz, 1H, CH2CO), 4. 28 (ddd, J=10 Hz, J=7 Hz,
6
), 1.19 (d, J=7 Hz, 3H, CHCH3
6 ), 1.68–1.77
16. The degree of enolization of keto-lactone 5 adds to the
difficulty of predicting its reacting conformation in solu-
tion. A CDCl3 solution showed 5 as its keto-tautomer
(>95%), while in DMSO the enol-form prevailed (>90%).
17. Gage, J. R.; Evans, D. A. Org. Synth. 1989, 68, 77–91.
18. The ratio of C3 epimers was detected by NMR to be
equal to 4/1. Chromatographic separation of epimers
gave pure 10 in 60% yield.
6
2CH3), 1.92–2.00 (ddq, J=3 Hz,
6
6
6
6
J=3 Hz, 1H, CHO); MS (EI): 156 (M+), 127 (M−C2H5+),
98, 85, 56, 42; HRMS calcd for C8H12O3 155.0708, found
155.0710; [h]2D5=+144, c=5.5 mg/ml in Et2O. NMR data
are in accordance with that of racemic 5: Branda¨nge, S.;