I. Abdulazeez et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 264 (2018) 58–65
63
Table 2
285 nm and from 349 to 347 nm, and the charge transfer band shifted
from 410 to 405 nm. Such a small hypsochromic shift could be due to
the addition of ACN which is more polar than THF. The reason for the
dark yellowish-green formation could be due to the ACN solvent stabi-
lizing non-bonding orbitals through hydrogen bonding, leading to an in-
crease in the amount of energy required to excite an electron originating
from a non-bonding orbital.
Moreover, the complexation in water has been investigated. Since
HNHBH is hardly soluble in water, a 50:50 ratio of water and THF was
used. The ligand in a 50% THF mixed aqueous solution had an absorption
maxima at 296 nm and a shoulder peak at 335 nm, which is similar to
the case of the ligand in THF. The spectrum of the ligand-Ni complex
in a 50% THF mixed aqueous solution was also similar to that of the
ligand-Ni complex in THF (Fig. 4), with a charge transfer band at
400 nm and two isosbestic points at 293 and 347 nm. The slight
hypsochromic shift observed was similar to the case of ACN, since
water is also a more polar solvent compared to THF.
Binding energies of metal ions complexes with HNHBH ligand as calculated at the B3LYP/
6-31G* and B3LYP/6-311 + G* levels of theory.
Metal ion
Binding energy (Kcal/mol)
B3LYP/6-31G*
B3LYP/6-311 + G*
Ni2
Cu
Zn
+
−486.4
−417.4
−399.2
−464.6
−397.2
−378.2
2
+
+
2
HNHBH in THF turned from colourless to pale yellowish-green. The UV–
Vis spectral pattern is similar to that of the ligand-Ni complex in THF
(
Fig. 4). However, the peak wavelength of the charge transfer band
has gradually shifted from 400 to 390 nm upon the addition of the inter-
ference solutions, and three isosbestic points were observed at 244, 344
and 380 nm.
Comparing the spectrum in Fig. 7 with the individual spectra of the
ligand with nickel (II), copper (II) and zinc (II) ions, the charge transfer
band shape suggests that zinc (II) interfered with the formation of the
ligand-Ni complex more than copper (II) did. Hence the formation of
the ligand-Ni complex was influenced by the presence of the zinc (II)
ions and, to less extent, copper (II) ions, but not magnesium (II), calcium
3.2.3. pH effects
The ligand-metal complex is expected to be sensitive to the pH of the
solution, as the ligand is expected to coordinate with the metal ion
through the lone pairs of electrons on the oxygen and nitrogen atoms.
While the addition of a base is expected to deprotonate the oxygen
and nitrogen atoms and hence enhance the ligand ability to bind to
the metal ion, the addition of an acid is expected to protonate the oxy-
gen and nitrogen atoms and thus disrupt the formation of the complex
or even regenerate the ligand in its free form. NaOH was chosen as the
base for the investigation of the pH effect after verifying that a solution
of the ligand did not change color when treated with neutral solution of
sodium chloride. The addition of a few drops of the acid or base to the
solution of the ligand or the ligand-metal complex caused a distinct
color change without a significant change of pH. Furthermore, the
color change was observed to be independent of the composition of
the mixed aqueous solution.
Adding NaOH to a mixed aqueous solution of the ligand and a metal
salt increased the selectivity of the ligand for nickel (II) (Table 3). On a
subsequent addition of HCl to the basic solution, however, the bright
yellow color was retrieved indicating a higher selectivity for nickel
ions in basic conditions. The addition of HCl to a mixed aqueous solution
of the ligand and a metal salt other than nickel (II) resulted with a
colourless solution, and the addition of nickel (II) to the same solution
turned it pale green-yellow.
To further investigate the pH phenomenon, a UV–Vis spectrum was
measured at alkaline conditions (Fig. 9a). The addition of NaOH caused
the charge transfer band of the ligand-Ni complex to broaden, and its
peak value was observed to slightly shift from 400 to 394 nm. The sub-
sequent addition of HCl was tested (Fig. 9b), and a clear back-shift was
observed. However, on further increase of the HCl concentration, no
change in the absorption pattern was observed.
The Mulliken atomic charge distribution of the HNHBH ligand was
calculated (Fig. 10) and used to predict the chemical reactivity at differ-
ent pH values. Atomic charges provide useful insights of relevance to the
electronic nature of the molecule, from which possible bonding, anti-
bonding or non-bonding features could be deduced [30]. For the
(II) or palladium (II) ions.
The nature of interaction between the ligand and the metal ions
was investigated on the basis of calculated frontier molecular or-
bitals (MOs). The charge transfer behaviour of any two reactants de-
pends on the spatial distribution of their frontier orbitals as well as
the energy gap maintained. The frontier orbitals of the HNHBH li-
gand before and after complexation were calculated and depicted
in Fig. 8. The MO interaction map shows that the free ligand LUMO
was primarily confined on the hydrazonic group, which suggests a
more likely binding site available for the metal ion. Upon complexa-
tion with metal ions, a corresponding energy shift in a form of an
overall decrease in the energy gap was expected. The Ni(II) ion com-
plex exhibits the most significant shift and consequently the most
stable complexation among the three metal ions, in agreement
with the trend observed in the color change when a complex
forms. Furthermore, the coordination energies were estimated for
Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) ions according to Eq. (1). The HNHBH-Ni
(
II) complex was calculated to possess the highest binding energy
as listed in Table 2. The observed selectivity of the ligand towards
nickel compared to the other metal ions could be attributed to the
size that suits the octahedral type of coordination environment
resulting with the relatively least tilted orientation while binding
to the metal ion center (Fig. 6).
3.2.2. Solvent effects
The effect of polar solvents (acetonitrile and water) on the color
change has been also explored. Fig. S4 shows the UV–Vis spectrum of
the ligand-Ni complex in acetonitrile (ACN). The spectrum appears sim-
ilar to that of the complex in pure THF (Fig. 4). However, in the ACN sol-
vent, the selectivity of the ligand for nickel (II) was slightly improved
and yielded a darker yellowish-green solution than the case for the
THF solvent. Interestingly, the isosbestic points moved from 308 to
Table 3
Color observations for HNHBH ligand in a 50:50 THF and water mixture with individual metal salts and mixtures of metal salts at acidic and basic conditions.
Metal salt
Mg(OAc)
2
Ca(OAc)
2
Ni(acac)
2
Cu(OAc)
2
Zn(OAc)
2
Pd(OAc)
2
Mixed metal
salts
Mixed metal salts
without Ni(acac)
2
with Ni(acac)
2
pH 7
Very, very pale
green-yellow
Very, very pale
green-yellow
Pale
Very pale
Very, very pale
green-yellow
Extremely pale
green-yellow
Greenish-yellow Very, very pale
green-yellow
green-yellow green-yellow
Addition NaOH Pale green-yellow Pale green-yellow Bright
Pale
Pale green-yellow Pale green-yellow Bright yellow
Pale green-yellow
of
yellow
Pale
green-yellow
Colourless
HCl
Colourless
Colourless
Colourless
Colourless
Pale
Colourless
green-yellow
green-yellow