Vol. 26, No. 10 (2014)
Process Improvements for the Preparation of Insecticide Clothianidin 2817
heptane (20 mL). The wet cake was dried under vacuum at
Under those circumstances, the development of a suitable
process for 1 with higher overall yield and without SiO
2
column
40-45 °C afford the desired product 1 (Tables 4 and 5) as a
10
1
chromatography purification was demanded. Our efforts has
been focusing on designing a safe and efficient synthesis
method of 1 that incorporates the following key characteristics:
white solid. m.p. 174-175 °C (Lit. 174-175 °C); H NMR
(500 MHz, DMSO-d ): 9.11 (bs, 1H), 7.94 (bs, 1H), 7.59 (s,
1H), 4.50 (bd, J = 4.75 Hz, 2H), 2.81 (bd, J = 4.75Hz, 3H);
6
13
(
1) group-protecting technology, (2) optimized conditions.
C NMR (DMSO-d
28.3.
6
, 100 MHz): δ 157.3, 150.7, 139.9, 37.2,
During this research, N-methyl-N'-nitroguanidine (5) could
be purchased as a commercially available compound. The
process improvements for the preparation of the insecticide
clothianidin 1 was introduced in this work.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Optimization for Mannich reaction: The (Z)-1-methyl-
N-nitro-5-propyl-1,3,5-triazinan-2-imine (9) was prepared by
Mannich reaction of N-methyl-N'-nitroguanidine (5), n-
propylamine and 37 % aqueous formaldehyde solution. The
optimized conditions for preparation of compound 9 were
obtained via screening the temperatures, time and solvents.
Firstly, several tests were performed to optimize the
temperatures (Table-1). When the reaction time was 6 h, using
methanol or ethanol as solvent, temperatures screening was
done among 45, 50, 55 °C and 60 °C (entries 1, 2, 3 and 4; 5,
EXPERIMENTAL
Starting materials, solvents and reagents were purchased
from commercial sources and were used as received without
further purification. Reactions were monitored by reversephase
HPLC on a DIONEX chromatograph. HPLC purity refers to
chromatographic area percentage. NMR spectra were recorded
on a Bruker 400 spectrometer and the chemical shifts were
reported in ppm with the solvent resonance as the internal
1
13
standard ( H, CDCl
3 6 3
: 7.26; DMSO-d : 2.50. C, CDCl : 77.0,
6
, 7 and 8). Results showed that 55 °C (entry 3) gave the best
results in comparison with other temperatures such as 45 °C
entries 1, 5), 50 °C (entries 2, 6) and 60 °C (entries 4, 8). As
DMSO-d : 39.5).
6
Synthesis of (Z)-1-methyl-N-nitro-5-propyl-1,3,5-
triazinan-2-imine (9): A mixture of the N-methyl-N'-nitro-
guanidine (5) (0.1 mol), n-propylamine (0.1 mol) and 15.2 mL
of 37 % aqueous formaldehyde solution (0.2 mol) in methanol
(
expected, better results would be obtained by modifying
reaction temperatures.
(50 mL) were heated to certain temperature for some time.
The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC until the starting
TABLE-1
TEMPERATURES, TIME AND SOLVENTS SCREENING
material was consumed (≤ 0.50 %). After being cooled to
a
FOR MANNICH REACTION
0 °C, the products precipitated out of the reaction mixture.
Filtration afforded the products in pure form (Table-1). m.p.
Solvent
100 mL)
HPLC area (%)
Entry Temp. (°C) Time (h)
(
9
5
1
0
1
5-86 °C (Lit. 84-86 °C); H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d
8
9
6
): δ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
45
50
55
60
45
50
55
60
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
6
6
Methanol
Methanol
Methanol
Methanol
Ethanol
95.62
95.89
97.57
96.01
92.43
93.14
94.10
93.65
97.26
93.72
97.49
94.01
97.53
94.07
95.33
93.64
93.70
93.51
90.79
91.77
84.60
72.30
4.38
4.11
2.43
3.99
7.57
6.86
5.90
6.35
2.74
6.28
2.51
5.99
2.47
5.93
4.67
6.36
6.30
6.49
9.21
8.23
15.40
27.70
.24 (bs, 1H), 4.31 (s, 2H), 4.29 (s, 2H), 2.86 (s, 3H), 2.57 (t,
13
J = 2H), 1.42-1.54 (m, 2H), 0.88 (t, J = 6, 3H). C NMR (100
MHz, DMSO-d ): δ 155.1, 67.7, 59.4, 51.8, 33.9, 20.4, 11.4.
6
6
6
Synthesis of (E)-1-[(2-chlorothiazol-5-yl)methyl]-3-me-
thyl-N-nitro-5-propyl -1,3,5-triazinan- 2-imine (10): A so-
lution of (Z)-1-methyl-N-nitro-5-propyl-1,3,5-triazinan-2-
imine (9) (15.3 g, 0.075 mol), base (0.186 mol) in a solvent
6
6
Ethanol
6
Ethanol
6
Ethanol
24
24
18
18
7
Methanol
Ethanol
(
100 mL) was added over 20 min to the slurry of 2-chloro-5-
chloromethyl) thiazole (4) (15.3 g, 0.075 mol) in typically
10
(
11
Methanol
Ethanol
solvent (50 mL) at < 30 °C. The reaction progress was moni-
tored by HPLC until consumption (20-24 h) of starting mate-
rial (≤ 0.50 %) and then cooled to 10 °C. After the filtration
and the concentration, the crude product was recrystallized
from methanol to afford compounds 10 (Tables 2 and 3). m.p.
12
13
Methanol
Ethanol
14
15
16
17
18
19
7
5
Methanol
Ethanol
5
4
Methanol
Ethanol
1
0
1
8
7
4-85 °C (Lit. 84-85 °C); H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d
.69 (s, 1H), 4.71 (s, 2H), 4.44 (d, 4H), 2.86 (s, 3H), 2.44 (t, J
7.35 Hz, 2H), 1.34 (tq, Jt = Jq = 6 Hz, 2H), 0.78(t, J = 7.33
6
): δ
4
2
Methanol
Ethanol
=
20
21
2
13
Hz, 3H). C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
41.5, 68.5, 64.4, 51.9, 43.1, 34.7, 20.2, 11.2.
Synthesis of (E)-1-(2-chloro-5-thiazolylmethyl)-3-
6
): δ 156.0, 151.6,
0.25
0.25
Methanol
Ethanol
22
1
a
Reaction conditions: N-methyl-N’-nitroguanidine (0.2 mol), n-propyl-
amine (0.2 mol), 37% aqueous formaldehyde solution (0.4 mol).
methyl-N-nitroguanidine (1): Certain quantity of acid was
added to a solution of compound 10 (0.015 mol) in MeOH
(
30 mL) over 20 min at 21-25 °C. The reaction mixture was
Furthermore, reaction time screening was done using 0.25,
2, 2.5, 4, 5, 6, 7, 18 and 24 h (Table-1, entries 3, 7, 9, 10, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22) at 55 °C, the
experimental results were showed in Table-1 and the optimal
reaction time was obtained at 6 h.
stirred at 21-25 °C until raw material 10 cannot be further
consumed by HPLC analysis. Then cooled to 0 °C, the crysta-
llized product out of the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture
was then filtered and the product cake was washed with n-