A. Rani et al.
Inorganica Chimica Acta 527 (2021) 120560
Fig. 5. Graphical representation of comparative metal ion detection by the 9H–carbazole derivative for Hg(II) and Mn(II).
3.4. Comparative data
methanol was ideal solvent for use, owing to high solubility and better
detection studies. To record the metal–ion effect on absorption spec-
trum, the standard solution of 1,2,3-triazole (3) with the concentration
of 0.2 mM in methanol was prepared. Same way, metal salt stock solu-
tions of Thorium (IV), Cerium (IV), Zinc (II), Cadmium (II), Copper (II),
Mercury (II), and Manganese (II) were prepared with 1 mM concentra-
tion. To access absorbance spectra, the metal salt solution was added
dropwise in cuvette containing already 2 ml of standard solution of
synthesized compound. The UV–Visible spectra were recorded at addi-
tion of one equivalent of metal salt solution in standard solution of
compound (3). Among the spectrally analysed set of metal ions, the
compound (3) exhibited significant shift in absorption maxima intensity
but negligible change was observed in absorption wavelength maxima
with Mercury (II) and Manganese (II) ions, as shown in Fig. 2.
The comparative results of metal ion detection by 9H–carbazole
derivative for Hg(II) and Mn(II) ions prove that the detection of Hg(II)
ions is nearly 2.5 times more effective in comparison to Mn(II) ions, as
shown in Fig. 5. In spite of detection of both these ions with d [5] (Mn
(II)) and d [10] (Hg(II)) system at wavelength of 283 nm, this difference
can be attributed to the binding of metal ion to the ligand. In terms of
HSAB principle, Hg(II) acts as soft acid and Mn(II) acts as hard acid and
the ligand contains donor N-atoms which are in resonance within the 5-
membered ring making them lesser hard due to utility of unpaired
electrons. As a result Hg(II) ions bind better to ligand as compared to Mn
(II) ions in the similar fashion.
3
.5. Response of compound (3) towards Cu(II) ions
3
.3.4. Response of compound (2) towards Hg(II) ions
The results of UV–vis spectra of Hg(II) titration presented a unique
To examine the response of carbazole triazole towards metal ion
response, with a swift increase in the absorption maxima associated with
an increase in absorbance value keeping value of wavelength constant.
The maximum absorbance value was achieved, by the successive addi-
tion 14 equiv. 10 mM solution of Hg(II) ions as shown in Fig. 3. The
changes in value of wavelength can be decayed because of this, the
unique behavior of Hg(II) ions can be explained as there is increase in
number of electronic transitions keeping energy gap between HOMO
and LUMO constant, due to which absorbance value increases from
sensing, different type of metals ion such as Zn(II), Hg(II), Th(IV), Cd(II),
Mn(II), Cu(II) and Ce(III) at 1 mM concentration were prepared in
methanol and investigated with the solution of 0.2 mM Carbazole tri-
azole in methanol. The outcome of UV–Visible data showed that only Cu
(
II) ion was bearing quenching sensations with a unique stimulated
changes in absorbance values while rest of metal ions were demon-
strating negligible quenching with target molecule as shown in bar
graph Fig. 2. The studies performed with remaining ions were not
remarked with “turn-on” quenching, except Cu(II) ion which exhibit
1
.2543 to 1.81291 . The lowest detection limit of Hg(II) ions, was
calculated using the plot of (A )/A vs concentration of Hg(II) ions,
– A
the detection limit 20 M of Hg (II) was obtained as shown in Fig. 3 (c).
o
n
o
“
turn-on” retort for absorption at 303 nm accompanied by hyperchromic
shift with the difference of 0.14 in absorbance value , in contrast at λmax
39 nm and 325 nm absorbance was gradually decreased with the
μ
3
3
.3.5. Response of compound (2) towards Mn(II) ions
addition of metal ion solution, which was assigned to “turn-off” response
The UV–vis spectra displayed an increase in absorption maxima upon
as shown in Fig. 6(a). Isosbestic point was rise at 320 nm due to this
successive addition 29 equiv. 10 mM solution of Mn(II) ions. It was
analyzed that, there is an increase in absorbance value that is 1.2616 to
“
turn-on” and “turn-off” phenomena. The reason for this distinctive
sensing attributes to the electronic configuration of Cu (II) that is [Ar]
1
.7523, whereas the concentration of compound (2) was decreased by
9
3
d and the presence of 3 electronegative atoms in probe ligand that is
the slowly addition of metal salt solution as shown in Fig. 4. The reason
behind this can be attributed to increase in the number of electrons in
transition from HOMO to LUMO. The energy gap between HOMO and
LUMO remains same because in UV–Visible spectra there is no desirable
change was detected in the wavelength. The lowest detection limit of Mn
10
nitrogen which made interaction with Cu and complete the octet as 3d
via ligand to metal charge transfer, because of this the lowest detection
limit of testing of Cu(II) ions is 23.5 µM Fig. 6(c).
3
.6. Mechanism of metal ion sensing
(
II) ions, was calculated using the plot of (Ao–An)/Ao vs concentration
of Mn(II) ions, the detection limit 10
shown in Fig. 4 (c).
μM of Mn (II) was obtained as
Among the various metal ions examined, the modulations in the
absorption behaviour of 9H-carbazole derivatives has been observed
only on complexation with Hg(II), Mn(II) and Cu(II) ions. These are
5