Silicate Complexes of Sugars in Aqueous Solution
A R T I C L E S
ketohexoses, which must have contributed to the positive results
for these systems.
availability, the trans diol stereochemistry does not permit
complexation.
Substrate Availability. The extent of formation of complexes
between silicic acid and sugars, aliphatic alcohols and diols,
phenols, and catechols has been rationalized by four factors:
(1) chelate formation, (2) HO acidity, (3) diol stereochemistry,
and (4) substrate availability. The first three already have been
discussed thoroughly. They do not, however, explain several
observations, so that exceptions must be possible. Harris,16
Kinrade,15 and their respective co-workers found that methanol
reacts with an ammonium silicate to form CH3OSi(OH)3.
Methanol provides neither chelation nor heightened acidity.
Harris’s conditions, however, involved 45% v/v methanol. In
all cases, reaction was only partial, and the equilibrium constant
[Si(OH)4 + CH3OH h CH3OSi(OH)3 + H2O] was always on
the side of silicic acid (K ) 0.46-0.80). Thus, even with an
overwhelming excess of alcohol, conversion is low. The poor
properties of methanol are overcome by higher substrate
availability (the concentration is raised to 45%). Higher avail-
ability is possible because of the high solubility of methanol in
water. Thus, complexation can occur in the absence of one or
more of the three principal factors, compensated by the fourth
factor of higher product availability. Sugars and catechols,
however, still react more completely.
Substrate availability also is an important factor in the
formation of sugar silicates, as outlined in the previous section.
The one anomer with a furanose ring and a cis stereochemistry
(Scheme 1) must be present in sufficient amount to provide an
observable product. Thus, glucose and mannose have very small
amounts of the favorable anomer, and we observe no product
with these substrates. Only sugars with an abundance of that
anomer gave positive results. Xylose and lyxose provide an
interesting borderline behavior. Both of these substrates did
produce an observable 29Si result (Table 2). The peaks, however,
were weak, and in only these two cases (of all of the successful
cases listed in Table 2) we also observed resonances from
unreacted silicic acid. In this aspect, these two substrates
resemble methanol and 1,4-dihydroerythritol (10), whose solu-
tions also contained resonances of unreacted silicic acid. Xylose
and lyxose suffer from lack of sufficient available substrate.
Keep in mind that the sugar isomers do not interconvert over
the time scale of the experiments.
Insufficient substrate availability can inhibit complex forma-
tion, because of either low solubility (11 and 12) or low anomer
abundance (glucose, mannose, and, to a lesser extent, xylose
and lyxose). The high substrate availability of methanol and
1,4-anhydroerythritol (10) can compensate for the absence of
diol structure or heightened HO acidity. The existence of sugar
silicates from methanol and 10 implies that it is possible that
complexation can occur with compounds that do not include
the anomeric carbon, as was already observed also with
polyhydroxy compounds.4-7 For example, glycosides in which
the anomeric position is blocked might form a chelate at the 2
and 3 positions, given cis stereochemistry. Such complexation,
however, is less favorable and would have to be augmented by
higher substrate availability. When both 1,2 and 2,3 positions
offer synperiplanar arrangements and are available, complex-
ation will always favor 1,2 reaction in aldoses because of the
heightened acidity of the anomeric OH. Nonetheless, 2,3 reaction
is a viable option, although we have not observed it under our
conditions.
We have already discussed 1,4-anhydroerythitol (10) as a
model for sugars. Lacking an anomeric carbon, it still has a
five-membered ring, analogous to furanoses, and a pair of cis
hydroxy groups. This molecule forms complexes with silicic
acid, producing the 29Si spectrum in Figure 4, previously
observed by Kinrade et al.8 Unlike almost all of the sugars for
which we observed complexation, 10 is not converted entirely
to the complex. Like methanol, 10 reacts only partially, as seen
in the 13C spectra in Figure 9. The major difference between
10 and reducing sugars or catechols is the absence of a hydroxy
group with heightened acidity. As with methanol, a critical factor
is the high solubility of 10 in water. Thus, greater substrate
availability compensates for the poorer acidity. In addition, the
absence of substituents on the 2 and 5 carbons may provide
better steric accessibility of the 3 and 4 hydroxy groups. Even
with higher solubility and possibly better steric accessibility,
10 still reacts less fully with silicic acid than do catechol and
reducing sugars such as ribose.
Gel Formation. Spectral characterization as described thus
far was carried out immediately after mixing of the reagents,
so that even the long-term NMR experiments were completed
in a few hours. Most of the sugar silicates formed a white gel
after standing 10-12 h, and almost all did so after a month.
Only sucrose and the glycitols (inositols) were stable indefi-
nitely in silicic acid solution. Although sugars appear to be
incorporated into the gels, we have no structural information
on them. This study is concerned only with the soluble silicate
products.
As a test of the hypothesis of substrate availability, we
examined cis-1,2-dihydroxycyclopentane (11) and cis-2,3-
dihydroxynorbornane (12). These molecules resemble 10 by
having cis diols attached to a five-membered ring. Neither
substrate, however, formed an observable stable, soluble
complex with silicic acid. Although 11 and 12 are stereochemi-
cally able to form the ring, we believe that their low solubility
in water (poor substrate availability) prevents sufficient sugar
silicate to be formed and detected under our conditions. We
also examined the trans form of 10, 1,4-anhydrothreitol, and
failed to observe any sugar silicate. Despite high product
Analogues to Sugar Silicates. Whereas complexation of
sugars with silicates was unknown prior to this study, at least
two analogous structures are quite common, the isopropylidene
acetals and the borates (compare structures 13-15). The acetals
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 31, 2004 9623