5
number of syntheses have been completed, but only two
4 proceeded with a high degree of stereoselectivity via attack
asymmetric syntheses of 1 have been reported by the
Winterfeldt and Overman groups.6
at C(3) from the face opposite the carboxyl group at C(5) to
give 5 as the only observed product. Although it was not
11
We were attracted some years ago to geissoschizine (1)
as a consequence of our interest in designing general
strategies for the synthesis of indole alkaloids, and we
developed one facile entry to this target in which a vinylo-
gous Mannich reaction and an intramolecular hetero Diels-
necessary to esterify the acid function in 3 prior to this
addition, subsequent transformations required protection of
the carboxyl group; therefore, 5 was treated with isobutylene
in the presence of acid to give 6 in 59% overall yield from
3. N-Acylation of 6 with diketene followed by a base-
induced, intramolecular Michael reaction gave 7 (86%), in
which the correct relative and absolute stereochemistries at
C(3) and C(15) have been established. The equatorial
orientation of the two substituents at C(15) and C(20) is
presumably subject to thermodynamic control, but this issue
has not been explicitly addressed.
5
e,g,7
Alder reaction were exploited as key constructions.
In
that synthesis, the relative stereochemistry between C(3) and
C(15) and the geometry of the ethylidene side chain were
controlled, thereby addressing two of the standing problems
in the area. However, this route to geissoschizine could not
be readily modified for an asymmetric synthesis of 1, and it
could not be adapted to provide intermediates related to
geissoschizine that could be transformed along biogenetic
pathways into the more complex indole alkaloids of the
Having assembled the requisite skeletal framework, it then
remained to refunctionalize 7 to give geissoschizine. Hydride
reduction of the ketone moiety in 7 gave the alcohol 8, which
was characterized by X-ray crystallographic analysis, as the
only product. The stereochemical outcome of this reduction
is consistent with that observed in closely related systems.7
Treatment of 8 with sodium methoxide in methanol induced
â-elimination and stereoselective introduction of the (E)-
ethylidene side chain. The resulting acid was esterified with
acetyl chloride, producing 9 in 85% overall yield from 7.
The lactam function was selectively reduced by the Borch
8
Sarpagine, Ajmaline, and Picraline groups. We now report
a novel entry to geissoschizine that provides a concise
solution to these two problems.
b,12
The synthesis commenced with the conversion of D-
tryptophan (2) into the dihydrocarboline 3 in a single
9
operation by a modification of a known procedure to set
the stage for the key vinylogous Mannich reaction (Scheme
7b,10
1).
In the event, reaction of 3 with the vinyl ketene acetal
1
3
protocol to furnish the ester 10 in 92% yield.
(
5) (a) Yamada, K.; Aoki, K.; Kato, T.; Uemura, D.; van Tamelen, E.
Scheme 1
E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974, 908. (b) Hachmeister, B.; Thielke,
D.; Winterfeldt, E. Chem. Ber. 1976, 109, 3825. (c) Wenkert, E.; Vankar,
Y. D.; Yadav, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7971. (d) Banks, B. J.;
Calverley, M. J.; Edwards, P. D.; Harley-Mason, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981,
2
1
2, 1631. (e) Martin, S. F.; Benage, B.; Hunter, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
988, 110, 5925. (f) Wenkert, E.; Guo, M.; Pesthanker, M. J.; Shi, Y. J.;
Vanker, Y. D. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 1166. (g) Martin, S. F.; Benage, B.;
Geraci, L. S.; Hunter, J. E.; Mortimore, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
1
. (h) Lounasmaa, M.; Jokela, R.; Miettinen, J.; Halonen, M. Heterocycles
1992, 34, 1497. (i) Lounasmaa, M.; Jokela, R.; Anttila, U.; Hanhinen, P.;
Laine, C. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 6803. (j) Bennasar, M.-L.; Jimenez, J.-
M.; Sufi, B. A.; Bosch, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 9105. (k) Takayama,
H.; Watanabe, F.; Kitajima, M.; Aimi, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5307.
(
6) (a) Bohlmann, C.; Bohlmann, R.; Rivera, E. G.; Vogel, C.;
Manandhar, M. D.; Winterfeldt, E. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1985, 1752. (b)
Overman, L. E.; Robichaud, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 300.
(
7) For other recent applications of vinylogous Mannich reactions to
alkaloid synthesis, see: (a) Martin, S. F.; Liras, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
1
1
3
15, 10450. (b) Martin, S. F.; Clark, C. W.; Corbett, J. W. J. Org. Chem.
995, 60, 3236. (c) Martin, S. F.; Barr, K. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
299. (d) Martin, S. F.; Clark, C. W.; Ito, M.; Mortimore, M.J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 9804.
8) For example, see: (a) van Tamelen, E. E.; Oliver, L. K. Bioorg. Chem.
976, 5, 309. (b) Herlem, D.; Flor e´ s-Parra, A.; Khuong-Huu, F.; Chiaroni,
(
1
A.; Riche, C. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 271. (c) Lounasmaa, M.; Hanhinen,
P. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 15225.
(
9) Previero, A.; Coletti-Previero, M.-A.; Barry, L.-G. Can. J. Chem.
968, 46, 3404.
10) For a recent review of the Mannich reaction, see: Arend, M.;
Westermann, B.; Risch, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 1045.
11) The numbering of all synthetic intermediates corresponds to that
shown in 1 for geissoschizine. The structure assigned to each compound
1
(
(
1
13
was in accord with its spectral ( H and C NMR, IR, MS) characteristics.
Analytical samples of all new compounds were obtained by distillation,
recrystallization, or preparative HPLC or TLC and gave satisfactory
combustion analysis (C, H) and/or identification by high-resolution mass
spectrometry. All yields are based on isolated, purified materials.
(
12) (a) Winterfeldt, E.; Radunz, H.; Korth, T. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101,
3
172. (b) Winterfeldt, E.; Gaskell, A. J.; Korth, T.; Radunz, H.-E.;
Walkowiak, M. Chem. Ber. 1969, 102, 3558. (c) Naito, T.; Kojima, N.;
Miyata, O.; Ninomima, I. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 1271.
(
13) Borch, R. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 61.
(14) Evans, D. A.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1063.
80
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 1, 1999