11
structureless emission band can generally be observed. The
use of excimer emission for various sensing applications is
well documented, especially for studies of the physicochem-
1
1c
ical properties of synthetic polymers.
Pyrene excimer
formation has also been used in a number of cases for nucleic
acid related applications, for example, selective sensing of
1
2
potassium or construction of novel nanomaterials. How-
ever, all these methods require that pyrene be covalently
attached to the nucleic acid, which is synthetically quite
demanding. As a result, such methods are time-consuming,
laborious, and very costly.
Figure 1. Structure of compound 1.
Supporting Information). As the concentration of compound
was increased, the I /I value became larger until the point
at which the I /I value reached the maximum. A further
increase of compound 1 concentration caused a decrease of
the I /I value. Figure S2 (Supporting Information) shows
the change in I /I value versus the change in concentration
of compound 1 for poly(dG)25 at pH 7.5 and for poly(dC)25
at pH 5.0 and 8.5. It was found that the maximum I /I value
for poly(dG)25 was much larger than that for poly(dC)25. For
poly(dC)25, the I /I value for pH at 8.5 was considerably
larger than that at pH 5.0.
We have synthesized a positively charged pyrene probe
1
E M
(
compound 1) (Figure 1). The probe shows considerable
E
M
water solubility (>1 mM). When compound 1 was mixed
with the oligonucleotides in an aqueous buffer solution,
remarkable changes in the fluorescence and UV-vis absorp-
tion spectra were observed (Figure 2). For all the oligo-
nucleotides tested, the spectra showed a significant decrease
in emission from the monomeric form of the pyrene probe
and the concomitant appearance of a red-shifted, broad
pyrene emission band with a peak maximum at around 485
nm, which was assigned to pyrene probe excimer emission
E
M
E
M
E
M
E
M
1
1
according to numerous literature reports.
The relative intensity of the pyrene excimer emission
varied significantly as a function of the amount of compound
1
that was added. Our results show that for a fixed poly(dA)25
and poly(dT)25 oligonucleotide concentration of 7.2 µM, the
intensity ratio of pyrene probe excimer emission (485 nm)
to monomer emission (377 nm) (the I
considerably as the concentration of compound 1 was varied.
The trends in the I /I values were quite similar (Figure S1,
E M
/I value) changed
E
M
(
2) (a) Thomas, S. W., III; Joly, G. D.; Swager, T. M. Chem. ReV. 2007,
1
07, 1339–1386. (b) Ho, H.-A.; Najari, A.; Leclerc, M. Acc. Chem. Res.
2
008, 41, 168–178. (c) Achyuthan, K. E.; Bergstedt, T. S.; Chen, L.; Jones,
R. M.; Kumaraswamy, S.; Kushon, S. A.; Ley, K. D.; Lu, L.; McBranch,
D.; Mukundan, H.; Rininsland, F.; Shi, X.; Xia, W.; Whitten, D. G. J. Mater.
Chem. 2005, 15, 2648–2656.
(
3) Gaylord, B. S.; Heeger, A. J.; Bazan, G. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2002, 99, 10954–10957.
4) Tang, Y.; Feng, F.; He, F.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Zhu, D. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14972–14976.
5) Park, S.-J.; Taton, T. A.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 2002, 295, 1503–
506.
6) Zhang, J.; Song, S.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.; Wu, H.; Pan, D.; Fan, C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8575–8580.
7) Li, H.; Rothberg, L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 14036–
Figure 2. UV-vis absorption and fluorescence emission spectra
(
of 180 µM of compound 1 alone and following its binding to 7.2
µM of simple oligonucleotide repeats in an aqueous buffer solution
(
(
MOPS, pH 7.5).
1
(
(
1
4039.
E M
As Figure 2 shows, the I /I value varied significantly with
(
8) Tan, W.; Wang, K.; Drake, T. J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8,
the sequence of the nucleic acid added. Poly(dG)25 gave by
far the largest I /I value (12.88). Poly(dA)25 and poly(dT)25
also showed large I /I values (6.20 and 3.03, respectively),
was considerably smaller for poly(dC)25
5
47–553.
E
M
(9) Wang, M.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, G.; Tang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhu, D. Anal.
Chem. 2008, 80, 6443–6448.
E
M
(
10) (a) Yu, C.; Wong, K. M.-C.; Chan, K. H.-Y.; Yam, V. W.-W.
but the value of I
E M
/I
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 791–794. (b) Yu, C.; Chan, K. H.-Y.;
Wong, K. M.-C.; Yam, V. W.-W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103,
(1.46).
1
9652–19657. (c) Yu, C.; Chan, K. H.-Y.; Wong, K. M.-C.; Yam, V. W.-
E M
The I /I value also varied significantly with the concen-
tration of the nucleic acid added. For example, when 3.6,
7.2, or 10.8 µM of poly(dA)25 was mixed with compound 1
W. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 4577–4584. (d) Yu, C.; Yam, V. W.-W. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 1347–1349. (e) Yu, C.; Chan, K. H.-Y.; Wong, K. M.-C.;
Yam, V. W.-W. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3756–3758.
(
11) (a) Birks, J. B. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1975, 38, 903–974. (b) De
(
Figure S3, Supporting Information), all three curves showed
the same trend as the probe concentration was increased.
The I /I value initially increased, reached the maximum,
Schryver, F. C.; Collart, P.; Vandendriessche, J.; Goedeweeck, R.; Swinnen,
A.; Van Der Auweraer, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 159–66. (c) Winnik,
F. M. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 587–614.
E
M
(
12) (a) Langenegger, S. M.; H a¨ ner, R. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2792–
and then began to decrease. With the increase of the
oligonucleotide concentration from 3.6 to 7.2 and 10.8 µM,
the concentration of compound 1 needed to reach the
2
8
793. (b) Okamoto, A.; Ichiba, T.; Saito, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
364–8365. (c) Nagatoishi, S.; Nojima, T.; Juskowiak, B.; Takenaka, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5067–5070. (d) Nakamura, M.; Ohtoshi,
Y.; Yamana, K. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5163–5165. (e) Malinovskii, V. L.;
Samain, F.; H a¨ ner, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4464–4467.
maximum I /I
E M
value increased from 150 to 180 and 270
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 19, 2009
4303