R. A. Smith et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1303–1306
1305
procedures reported for this class include a process via
the anhydrous magnesium complex of diethyl acetone-
1,3-dicarboxylate11 or the condensation of copper ethyl
acetoacetate with phosgene.12 After investigation of a
variety of reaction conditions, we found that the puta-
tive magnesium complex of dimethyl-1,3-ace-
tonedicarboxylate could be formed in situ and then
converted to the 2,6-diisopropyl pyrone 38, by an effi-
cient, one-pot process in 64% yield13 (Scheme 3). In
related examples, the 2,6-dimethyl and 2,6-dicyclohexyl
analogues were prepared in similar yields, whereas the
2,6-di-tert-butyl and 2,6-diphenyl analogues were not
obtained in significant yield through this procedure.
Treatment of pyrone 38 with ammonia (gaseous or
aqueous) readily gave the 4-hydroxy-pyridine 39,14 from
which could be prepared the 4-chloro-pyridine 40.15
Unfortunately, however, treatment of 40 with aryl
Grignard reagents such as 41 did not provide the
desired coupled products.
In summary, variation of the 4-aryl group in 4-aryl
pyridine glucagon antagonists was investigated, and a
wide variety of substituents was found to give reduced
activity, as compared to the 40-fluorophenyl lead 2.
Substitution by a 20-hydroxy moiety was surprisingly
well tolerated (30), and the most potent analogue iden-
tified in this study was a 40-fluoro-20-hydroxy-phenyl
analogue (33, IC50=190 nM). To permit the efficient
preparation of such 20-substituted phenyl-pyridines, a
novel synthesis via pyrones and 4-methoxy-pyridines
was developed, that proceeds in high yield from readily
available starting materials. In a future article, we will
describe the effect of combining the optimized substitu-
tions on the 4-aryl group (such as in 33) and the
pyridine ring (such as in 3).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank David Hartsough for compu-
tational studies, and members of the analytical
chemistry group for their valuable support.
We reasoned that an alternative leaving group on the
pyridine diester might facilitate the coupling reaction.
Noting that Meyers and colleagues have made extensive
use of the methoxy group as nucleofuge in their elegant
biaryl syntheses,16 we speculated that the methoxy
group might serve as an efficient leaving group in our
own system, and were encouraged by the fact that it
could be readily accessed from 39. Methylation of 39
proved straightforward,17 and, gratifyingly, warming
diester 42 with Grignard reagent 41 afforded phe-
nylpyridine 37 in 78% yield.18 Moreover, purification of
compound 37 involved only a simple trituration from
hexane to afford analytically pure product. Curiously,
we observed no addition of the Grignard reagent to the
methyl ester groups in 42, a consideration that had
caught our attention at the outset.
References and Notes
1. Amos, A. F.; McCarty, D. J.; Zimmet, P. Diabetic Med.
1997, 14, S7.
2. (a) Zhang, B. B.; Moller, D. E. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2000, 4, 461. (b) Cobb, J.; Dukes, I. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem.
1998, 33, 213.
3. (a) Livingston, J. N.; Schoen, W. R. Annu. Rep. Med.
Chem. 1999, 34, 189. (b) Connell, R. D. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat.
1999, 9, 701. (c) Cascieri, M. A.; Koch, G. E.; Ber, E.;
Sadowski, S. J.; Louizides, D.; De Laszlo, S. E.; Hacker, C.;
Hagmann, W. K.; MacCoss, M.; Chicchi, G. G.; Vicario, P. P.
J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 8694. (d) Madsen, P.; Knudsen, L. B.;
Wiberg, F. C.; Carr, R. D. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 5150.
4. (a) Ladouceur, G. H.; Cook, J. H.; Doherty, E. M.;
Schoen, W. R.; MacDougall, M. L.; Livingston, J. N. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 461. (b) Schoen, W. R.; Ladou-
ceur, G. H.; Cook, J. H.; Lease, T. G.; Wolanin, D. J.;
Kramss, R. H.; Hertzog, D. L.; Osterhout, M. H. US Patent
6,218,431, 2001; Chem. Abstr. 2001, 134, 311111.
5. Jones, G. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry: The
Structure, Reactions, Synthesis and Uses of Heterocyclic Com-
pounds; Katritzky, A. R., Rees, C. W., Booulton, A. J.,
McKillop, A., Eds.; Pergamon: New York, 1984; Vol. 2, Part
2A, p 482.
6. Pfister, D. Synthesis 1990, 689.
7. Topliss, J. G. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 1006.
8. All data reported herein reflect purified and characterized
(1H NMR, MS) samples. The human glucagon receptor bind-
ing assay was carried out as decribed previously.4a Selected
compounds were also tested in a functional cell assay,4a and
were determined to be antagonists. For many of the analogues
listed in Table 1, the 3-(1-E-pent-1-enyl)-pyridyl derivatives
were also tested, and these were found to have glucagon
binding activities comparable to or very slightly less than those
of the corresponding 3-(1-pentyl)-pyridyl derivatives.
9. Lloyd-Williams, P.; Giralt, E. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30,
145.
10. (a) Alajarin, R.; Vaquero, J. J.; Garcia Navio, J. L.;
Alvarez-Builla, J. Synlett 1992, 297. (b) Loev, B.; Goodman,
M. M.; Snader, K. M.; Tedeschi, R.; Macko, E. J. Med. Chem.
Scheme 3. Alternative synthesis of intermediate 37.