K. Vranda Shenoy, P.P. Venugopal, P.D. Reena Kumari et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure 1232 (2021) 130074
hibitor and that of obtained from the surface of the MS copouns
immersed in 0.5 M HCl solution containing 500 ppm DMPIP for
15 h at 298 K were recorded.
3. Results and discussion
3
.1. Tafel polarization study
The electrochemical kinetics of corrosion process was studied
using Tafel polarization study in absence and presence of vary-
ing concentrations (50–500 ppm) of DMPIP in 0.5 M HCl solution.
The corrosion potential (Ecorr) and corrosion current density (icorr),
slope of the cathodic branch (βc) and slope of the anodic branch
(
β
a) were acquired from tafel polarization curves. The rate of cor-
rosion (νcorr) was calculated from icorr using expression 1 [48,49].
Fig. 2. Open Circuit Potential values versus Time for MS in 0.5 M HCl with and
ꢀ
ꢁ
3
270 × M × icorr
q × Z
−
1
without inhibitor.
v
corr mm y
=
(1)
where 3270 is a constant of corrosion rate, icorr refers corrosion
Polarization curves were obtained in the potential range from
−2
current density (A cm ), q is the corroding material density (g
−
200 to +200 mV after establishing the OCP with a scan rate of
−3
cm ), M is the metal atomic mass and Z is the number of elec-
−1
1
mVs . All the reported potential values were referred to SCE.
trons transferred/atom. Eq. (2) is used to calculate the percentage
The corrosion current density (icorr) values were obtained by the
Tafel extrapolation method. The electrochemical impedance mea-
surements were performed in the frequency range of 100 kHz to 10
mHz with 5 mV amplitude at OCP. EIS data were investigated and
then analyzed using Zsimpwin software. Reproducibility checked at
least three times for each experimental setup, and the average val-
ues were taken and presented.
of inhibition efficiency (η%).
0
corr
i
− icorr
η% =
× 100
(2)
o
icorr
where, i˚corr and icorr are values of corrosion current density val-
ues for blank solution and solutions with various concentrations
of DMPIP, respectively. From Fig. 3(a), it is visible that the nature
of polarization curves remains unchanged both in uninhibited and
inhibited solution. But in the presence of DMPIP and as the con-
centration was increased, the polarization branches shifted toward
lower current density region indicating slowdown of the electro-
chemical reactions. The related experimental parameters are listed
in Table 1, shows that as the concentration of the inhibitor in-
creases, icorr decreases, correspondingly, η% increases. However, an
increase in the νcorr with temperature suggests decreased inhibi-
tion efficacy by DMPIP molecules on MS surface at higher tem-
peratures. DMPIP recorded best inhibition efficiency (96.79%) at
500 ppm at 303 K, indicating that at this optimum concentra-
tion, DMPIP can provide more significant inhibitor protective effect
against metal corrosion. Higher temperature tafel plots for 313 K
and 323 K are given in Supplementary Information (Figure S1 and
Figure S2).
2
.2. Quantum chemical study
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations are considered as
the “green corrosion inhibition method” which helps to under-
stand the molecular structure and its corrosion inhibition behavior.
The electronic/molecular properties and reactivity indices of the
inhibitor can accurately predict its corrosion inhibition efficiency.
Correlation between experimental investigations regarding inhibi-
tion efficiency and theoretical calculations helps in understand-
ing the observed experimental behavior of the inhibitor by study-
ing the molecular structure. DFT was used to analyze the elec-
tronic properties of the DMPIP molecule in its neutral and pro-
tonated forms in aqueous phase by Becke’s three-parameter ex-
change functional theory with the Lee–Yang–Parr non local corre-
lation functional (B3LYP) [46] and 6–311++G(d, p) [47] basis set in
Gaussian09 program package using SCF approach. Quantum chem-
ical parameters associated with energies such as energy of highest
occupied molecular orbital (EHOMO), energy of lowest unoccupied
molecular orbital (ELUMO) and energy gap (ꢀEgap) have been as-
sessed. Other chemical parameters like electronegativity (χ), elec-
tron affinity (A), ionization energy (I), global softness (σ), global
hardness (η), dipole moment (μ) and the fraction of electrons
transferred (ꢀN) were also studied. Mulliken charge distribution
and Fukui indices were calculated to analyze the local reactive sites
on the inhibitor molecule.
Table 1, reveals that there was no noticeable shift in corro-
sion potential values (Ecorrinh) were observed after the addition of
DMPIP with concerning to the corrosion potential values (Ecorrblank
)
of blank solution. Normally, inhibitors can be arranged as either
anodic or cathodic if the shifting of Ecorrinh values exceeds ± 85 mV
compared to the Ecorrblank values [50]. However, in this work, max-
imum displacement was less than ± 85 mV; hence, DMPIP can
be classified as mixed-type inhibitor controlling both dissolutions
of metal and hydrogen liberation reactions [51,52]. Additionally, to
get more insight of the inhibition mechanism all the polarization
plots were displaced to the zero potential (Ecorr = 0) as shown in
Fig. 3(b). The displacement of both of the cathodic and anodic cur-
rent densities towards lower current densities at different concen-
trations of DMPIP evidence a mixed inhibition effect on the MS
[18,53]. At higher concentrations of inhibitor, the icorr values de-
crease more predominantly suggesting the more or less complete
isolation of metal surface from the aggressive media by forming a
protective barrier due to the accumulation of a higher number of
DMPIP molecules at the MS surface which provides wider surface
coverage area.
2
.3. Surface morphology investigations
SEM images and EDX images of the test samples were recorded
and analyzed after exposure to 0.5 M HCl solution in the absence
and presence of DMPIP for 15 h using SEM model Carl Ziess FE-
SEM and Oxford instruments respectively. The adsorption of DMPIP
on MS was elucidated by probing the surface of the working
electrodes using FTIR spectroscopic technique. Bruker instruments
−1
−1
spectrometer in the frequency range of 500 cm
to 4000 cm
As it can be noted from Table 1, compared with the blank so-
lution, the anodic Tafel slopes (βa) for inhibitors exhibit the ob-
used for FTIR analysis to study the FTIR data related to DMPIP in-
3