irradiation for 24 h, 9H-fluoren-9-one (5) in 72.5% (on the basis
of 1) and 10-methylacridin-9(10H)-one (6) in 96.0% (on the
basis of AcrH2) were obtained (Scheme 2). In a control
experiment, when a solution of 1 in oxygen-saturated aqueous
acetonitrile was irradiated for 24 h, no 9H-fluoren-9-one was
obtained.
Scheme 4
29832040) and Special Fund for Doctoral Program from the
Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 98035818).
Scheme 2
Notes and references
Fukuzumi et al. reported that irradiation of a solution of
AcrH2 in air-saturated acetonitrile with UV light for 25 h
produced 10-methylacridin-9(10H)-one and hydrogen perox-
ide.2a Hoz et al. reported that the superoxide radical anion
reacted with the activated olefin to give the corresponding
ketone through the intermediacy of a peroxide radical anion of
the olefin.10
We have reported that in the reaction of 1,1-diphenyl-
2,2-dinitroethylene with BNAH in oxygen-saturated acetoni-
trile, benzophenone was formed along with 1,1-diphenyl-
2,2-dinitroethane.11
In the present case, it is probable that in oxygen saturated
acetonitrile electron transfer between AcrH2 (lmax = 286 nm)
and FDCN (lmax = 347 nm) takes place under irradiation to
generate the radical cation AcrH2·+ and the radical anion 2, the
latter reacts with oxygen to produce a peroxide radical anion,
and the two radical ions then transform to the corresponding
ketones, as shown in Scheme 3.
1 (a) D. M. Strout and A. I. Meyers, Chem. Rev., 1982, 82, 223; (b) S.
Yasuo and A. Ohno, Bioorg. Chem., 1986, 14, 70; (c) F. H. Westheimer,
in Pyridine Nucleotide Coenzyme, eds. D. Dolphin, R. Poulson and O.
Avramovic, 1988, Part A, Wiley-Interscience, New York, p. 253; (d) Y.
Kim, D. G. Truhlar and M. M. Kreevoy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113,
7837; (e) Y. Murakami, J. Kikuchi, Y. Hisaeda and O. Hayashida,
Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 721.
2 (a) S. Fukuzumi, M. Ishikawa and T. Tanaka, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 1989, 1037; (b) S. Fukuzumi, K. Hiromaka and T. Tanaka, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 4722; (c) L. P. Olson and T. C. Bruice,
Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 7335; (d) Ö. Almarsson, A. Sinha, E. Gopinath
and T. C. Bruice, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 7093; (e) M. Gota, Y.
Mikata and A. Ohno, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1990, 63, 2683.
3 (a) A. Anne, P. Hapiot, J. Moiroux, P. Neta and J.-M. Savéant, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 4694; (b) J.-M. Savéant, Acc. Chem. Res., 1993,
26, 455; (c) A. Anne, P. Hapiot, J. Moiroux, P. Neta and J.-M. Savéant,
J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95, 2370; (d) C. A. Coleman, J. G. Rose and C.
J. Murray, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 9755.
4 Y. C. Liu, B. Li and Q. X. Guo, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 8429; Y.
C. Liu, B. Li and Q. X. Guo, Tetrahedron, 1995, 9671.
5 Y. C. Liu, X. Q. Zhu, L. M. Wu, Q. X. Guo, B. R. Li, D. P. Wang and
Y. D. Wu, Book of Abstracts for 5th Eurasia Conference on Chemical
Science, Zhongshan University Press, Guangzhou, China, Dec. 10–14,
1996, 150.
6 (a) X. Q. Zhu and Y. C. Liu, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 2786; (b) X. Q.
Zhu, Y. C. Liu, H. Y. Wang and W. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
8982.
7 Crystal data for 4: C30H21N3, Mr = 423.50, monoclinic, P21/c, a =
9.7538(5), b = 9.4805(5), c = 24.491(1) Å, b = 95.071(1)°, V =
2255.9(2) Å3, Z = 4, m = 0.074 mm21, q-range 1.67–25.04°, 3996
independent reflections, refinement on F2 for 299 parameters, wR (F2,
all refl.) = 0.106, R1[2281 obs. refl. with I > 2s(I)] = 0.041. CCDC
tronic files in .cif or other electronic format.
8 M. J. S. Dewar and W. Thiel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 4907.
9 Selected spectral data for 4. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6): d 7.23 (d, J =
7.2 Hz, 2H, H4, H5), 7.04 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, H1, H8), 6.98 (t, J = 7.2
Hz, 2H, H2, H7), 6.95 (m, 2H, H1A, H8A), 6.94 (m, 2H, H3, H6), 6.93 (m,
2H, H3A, H6A), 6.62 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, H2A, H7A), 6.27 (d, J = 8.2 Hz,
2H, H4A, H5A), 4.94 (s, 1H, H9A), 3.83 (s, 1H, H10), 2.31 (s, 1H, H11A);
13C NMR (125.8 MHz, C6D6): d 143.58 (C4AA, C10AA), 142.72 (C4A,
C4B), 142.14 (C8A, C9A), 130.22 (C1A, C8A), 129.53 (C2, C7), 128.67
(C3A, C6A), 127.22 (C3, C6), 125.12 (C4, C5), 120.87 (C2A, C7A), 120.42
(C1, C8), 119.95 (C8AA, C9AA), 112.96 (C4A, C5A, C11, C12), 59.08
(C9), 49.89 (C9A), 32.83 (C11A), 30.38 (C10). The signals of the 1H
NMR and 13C NMR spectra were assigned on the basis of 1H–1H
COSY, 1H–13C COSY and 1H–13C HMBC spectra.
Scheme 3
From the results described above it seems likely that the
coupling reaction in deaerated acetonitrile occurs via a single
electron transfer pathway. According to the quantum mechanics
calculation made on 9-fluorenylmalononitrile radical anion
(2),12 there are 0.348 units of negative charge on the Ca but little
charge on the C9, whereas the spin densities on the Ca and C9
are 0.195 and 0.246, respectively. Thus, it is conceivable that
when the radical ion pair AcrH2·+ and 2 is formed, proton
transfer from C9’ of AcrH2·+ to Ca of 2 is followed by radical
coupling between C9 and C9’ to form the product 4 (Scheme
4).
This provides a rare example of a radical coupling reaction in
the reactions of NADH models13 since, instead of the usual
electron transfer–proton transfer–electron transfer or electron
transfer–hydrogen abstraction mechanism, the reaction appears
to take place via an electron transfer–proton transfer–radical
coupling pathway.
10 S. Hoz and D. Speizman, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 2904.
11 Y. C. Liu, H. Y. Wang, Q. C. Yang and T. C. W. Mak, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 2000, 649.
12 B. R. Li, D. P. Wang and Y. D. Wu, unpublished results.
13 (a) S. Fukuzumi, Y. Fujii and T. Suenobu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
10191; (b) M. Fujita, A. Ishida, S. Takamuku and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 8566.
This work was supported by National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant No. 20072036, Grant No.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 882–883
883