Scheme 1
.
Retrosynthetic Analysis
Scheme 2.
Ir-Catalyzed Allylic Aminationa
Pauson-Khand step,11a interchange of protecting groups,11b
or very high numbers of steps.11c The protecting group at
nitrogen of intermediate D of Scheme 1 is of crucial
importance for the diastereoselectivity with respect to centers
C3 and C3a. In a series of tests, we found that an N-Boc
group generally gave rise to high diastereoselectivity.12 This
group appeared also compatible with all other planned
synthetic operations. The Si(t-Bu)Me2 (TBDMS) group was
selected as the O-protecting group because of the possibility
to directly oxidize a CH2OSi(t-Bu)Me2 group to a carboxyl
group.13
a TBD: 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene. b The term b/l denotes the
ratio of branched and linear product of the allylic amination.
synthesis, one would like to carry out a substitution at the
carbonate 215b (Scheme 2) using N-Boc-but-2-inylamine as
nucleophile. However, so far conditions have not been
developed that allow N-alkyl-amides to be employed.
Therefore, two related nucleophiles were probed.
The Ir-catalyzed allylic amination has been developed into
a reliable tool over the past few years.14 In the present
(9) (a) Oppolzer, W.; Thirring, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4978–
4979. (b) Takano, S.; Sugihara, T.; Satoh, S.; Ogasawara, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 6467–6471. (c) Takano, S.; Iwabuchi, Y.; Ogasawara, K.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 1204–1206. (d) Baldwin, J. R.;
Moloney, M. G.; Parsons, A. F. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 7263–7282. (e)
Cooper, J.; Knight, D. W.; Gallagher, P. T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1992, 553–559. (f) Hatakeyama, S.; Sugawara, K.; Takano, S. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 125–127. (g) Hanessian, S.; Ninkovic, S. J.
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5418–5424. (h) Rubio, A.; Ezquerra, J.; Escribano,
A.; Remuinan, M. J.; Vaquerro, J. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2171–
2174. (i) Campbell, A. D.; Raynham, T. M.; Taylor, R. J. K. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 245–246. (j) Cheliakov, M. V.; Montgomery, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11139–11143. (k) Nakagawa, H.; Sugahara, T.;
Ogasawara, K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3181–3183. (l) Miyata, O.; Ozawa, Y.;
Ninomiya, I.; Naito, T. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6199–6207. (m) Clayden,
J.; Menet, C. J.; Tchabanenko, K. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4727–4733. (n)
Montserrat Martinez, M.; Hoppe, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3743–3746. (o)
Montserrat Martinez, M.; Hoppe, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1427–1443.
(p) Scott, M. E.; Lautens, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3045–3047. (q) Poisson,
J.-F.; Orellana, A.; Greene, A. E. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10860–10863.
(r) Morita, Y.; Tokuyama, H.; Fukuyama, T. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4337–
4340. (s) Anderson, J. C.; O’Loughlin, J. M. A.; Tornos, J. A. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2005, 3, 2741–2749. (t) Hodgson, D. M.; Hachisu, S.; Andrews,
M. D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 815–817. (u) Pandey, S. K.; Orellana, A.; Greene,
A. E.; Poisson, J.-F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5665–5668. (v) Sakaguchi, H.;
Tokuyama, H.; Fukuyama, T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1635–1638. (w) Jung,
Y. C.; Yoon, C. H.; Turos, E.; Yoo, K. S.; Jung, K. W. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 10114–10122. (x) Chalker, J. M.; Yang, A.; Deng, K.; Cohen, T.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3825–3828. (y) Sakaguchi, H.; Tokuyama, H.; Fukuyama,
T. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1711–1714.
The N,N-diacylamine 3 is an ammonia equivalent, which
is known to provide both excellent regioselectivity, i.e., a
high ratio of branched to linear substitution product, as well
as high enantiomeric excess.15 The reaction with carbonate
2 under “salt-free” conditions15a gave the branched product
4 in 87% yield with enantiomeric purity of 97.5% ee (Scheme
2).
Amines are also excellent nucleophiles for the Ir-catalyzed
allylic amination.16 In the present case, the primary amine
but-2-ynylamine (5) appeared as a logical choice. However,
so far no example of a reaction with a propargylic amine
has been reported.17 Accordingly, we were pleased to find
that the reaction proceeded with a very good regioselectivity,
ratio b/l ) 94:6, and an excellent enantiomeric excess of
99% (Scheme 2).
(13) (a) Evans, P. A.; Roseman, J. D.; Garber, L. T. Synth. Commun.
1996, 26, 4685–4692. (b) Evans, P. A.; Murthy, V. S.; Roseman, J. D.;
Rheingold, A. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3175–3177. (c) Liu,
H.-J.; Han, I.-S. Synth. Commun. 1985, 15, 759–764.
(14) Reviews: (a) Takeuchi, R. Synlett 2002, 1954–1965. (b) Helmchen,
G.; Dahnz, A.; Du¨bon, P.; Schelwies, M.; Weihofen, R. Chem. Commun.
2007, 675–691. (c) Miyabe, H.; Takemoto, Y. Synlett 2005, 1641–1655.
(d) Helmchen, G. In Iridium Complexes in Organic Synthesis; Oro, A.,
Claver, C., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2009; pp 211-250.
(15) Ir-catalyzed allylic amination with N,N-diacylamines: (a) Weihofen,
R.; Tverskoy, O.; Helmchen, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5546–
5549. (b) Gnamm, C.; Franck, G.; Miller, N.; Stork, T.; Bro¨dner, K.;
Helmchen, G. Synthesis 2008, 3331–3350. (c) Singh, O. V.; Han, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7094–7098.
(10) Asymmetric catalysis: (a) Bachi, M. D.; Melman, A. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 1896–1898. (b) Xia, Q.; Ganem, B. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 485–487.
(c) Trost, B. M.; Rudd, M. T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1467–1470.
(11) Syntheses based on a Pauson-Khand reaction: (a) Yoo, S.-E.; Lee,
S. H.; Jeong, N.; Cho, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 34, 3435–3438. (b) Yoo,
S.-E.; Lee, S. H. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6968–6972. (c) Takano, S.;
Inomata, K.; Ogasawara, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 169–
170.
(16) (a) Ohmura, T.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15164–
15165. (b) Welter, C.; Koch, O.; Lipowsky, G.; Helmchen, G. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 896–897. (c) Welter, C.; Dahnz, A.; Brunner, B.; Streiff,
S.; Du¨bon, P.; Helmchen, G. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1239–1242. (d) Polet, D.;
Alexakis, A.; Tissot-Croset, K.; Corminboeuf, C.; Ditrich, K. Chem.sEur.
J. 2006, 12, 3596–3609.
(12) We have tested Ts, SO2t-Bu, Boc, and Cbz as N-protecting groups.
Excepting Boc, in all cases the diastereoselectivity was in the range of 66:
34 to 82:18. This observation is in accordance with results described in:
Yoo, S.-E.; Lee, S.-H.; Jeong, N.; Cho, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 3435–
3438, and in ref 11b.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 5, 2010
1109