326
Z.A. Kozhamkulova et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 4 (2011) 323–327
sulfuric acid (97%, 1 mL)] spray reagent followed by heating.
Preparative TLC was performed on Analtech Uniplates, having a
3.4. Preparation and analysis of the volatile oil
silica gel GF preparative layer with UV 254, 20 ꢁ 20 cm, 1500
m
m
The air-dried plant material (400 g) was subjected to steam
distillation (5 h) to yield 0.05 g of light-yellow oil with unpleasant
smell (0.013%, w/w yield). Reference Standards: Different mono-
terpenes, sesquiterpenes, and alkanes were obtained from Aldrich
Chemical Co. Inc. (Milwaukee, WI), Fluka Chemical Corp. (New
York, NY), Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), and Varian
Associates (Houston, TX). These reference standards include:
thick. High-performance flash chromatography (HPFC) was per-
formed using a Horizon Biotage system (Biotage, Inc., Charlottes-
villle, VA) with normal phase silica gel cartridges (KP-SIL, 10 g, 40–
˚
63 lm, 60 A, Biotage).
3.2. Plant material
tricyclene,
nene, fenchone,
trans-carveol,
-cedrene, (ꢀ)-isoledene, (ꢀ)-isolongifolene, (ꢀ)-
isolongifolol, -humulene, cuparene, myristyl alcohol, citronellyl
acetate, neryl acetate, geranyl acetate, camphene, alloaromaden-
drene, n-eicosane, n-heneicosane, and hydrocarbon references
(C9–C21). Solutions were prepared in methanol at concentrations
of 1 mg/mL. Volatile oil solution: For GCMS analysis the volatile oil
was dissolved in MeOH at a concentration of 10 mg/mL (Table 2).
a
-pinene, sabinene,
a-phellandrene, 1-decene, limo-
The aerial parts including flowers of the plant H. halodendron
(Pall) Vos. were collected on May 29th, 2010 from Almaty region in
mountain plain Zailiiskii Alatau. The plant was identified by Dr.
Gemedzhieva, professor of botany at Institute of plant biology, Al-
Farabi Kazakhstan National University, Almaty. A voucher speci-
men (HH-25) was kept at the Institute of Plant Biology, Almaty,
Khazakhstan.
a
-terpineol, terpinolene, cis-verbenol, cis-and
a
a
3.3. Extraction and isolation
3.5. Fatty acids of Halimodendron halodendron
Air-dried plant material (700 g) was extracted by maceration
with MeOH (3 L ꢁ 3) for 24 h at room temperature. The combined
MeOH extracts were concentrated under vacuo to afford 90 g
residue which was subjected to fractionation by vacuum liquid
chromatography (VLC) over a silica gel column (1.5 kg), eluting
with mixtures of hexanes–EtOAc (100:0–0:100), followed by
EtOAc–MeOH (100:0–0:100) and finally with H2O–MeOH (25:75).
Eleven fractions (A–K) were collected (2 L each). Fraction B: (1.9 g,
eluted with 20% EtOAc in hexane) was chromatographed over a
silica gel columm (60 g, 2 cm i.d ꢁ 65 cm) eluted with mixtures of
hexanes–EtOAc in a manner of increasing polarities. Forty-seven
subfractions were collected (50 mL each). Subfractions 19–20
(741 mg, eluted with 2% EtOAc in hexane) was purified on solid
phase extraction (SPE) amino column (20 g) using eluents: CHCl3,
1% isopropanol in CHCl3, 2% isopropanol in CHCl3, and finally 2%
Acetic acid in CHCl3 to afforded palmitic acid (691 mg). Subfrac-
tions 24–28 (201 mg, eluted with 5% EtOAc in hexane) gave
glycerol -1,3-dilinoleneate (201 mg). Fractions C–E were combined
(3.6 g) and were chromatographed over a silica gel columm (80 g,
2 cm i.d ꢁ 65 cm) eluted with mixtures of hexanes–EtOAc in a
manner of increasing polarities. Sixty-nine subfractions (50 mL
each) were collected. Subfractions 10–12 (720.2 mg, eluted with
10% EtOAc in hexane) was purified on SPE amino column (20 g)
using 1% isopropanol in CHCl3; 2% isopropanol in CHCl3, 2% acetic
Extraction: 0.5 gram of the aerial part of the plant was extracted
with hexane (2 mL ꢁ 3) and the hexane extracts were combined
and evaporated in vacuo to afford 8.0 mg residue.
Saponification of the lipoidal matter in the hexane extract: The
hexane extract (8.0 mg) was dissolved in hexane (0.5 mL) and
alcoholic KOH solution (2 mL) was added. The mixture was
refluxed for 1 h, then cooled and diluted with distilled H2O (4 mL)
and extracted with ether (4 mL ꢁ 2) to remove the unsaponifiable
matter. The ether layer was washed with water (1 mL ꢁ 5) and the
aqueous washes were added to the aqueous layer. The combined
aqueous phase was rendered acidic with 10% H2SO4 and extracted
with ether (8 mL ꢁ 2). The ether layer was dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness (fatty acids fraction).
Esterification of fatty acids: The fatty acid fraction was dissolved
in 0.5 mL dry ether (in
a GC vial) and freshly prepared
diazomethane solution was added (6 drops) twice (until efferves-
cence ceased). The ethereal reaction mixture was evaporated in the
GC vial and the residue was dissolved in 0.8 mL dry ether and the
vial was capped.
Reference standards: Reference standards of methyl esters of
fatty acids were obtained from Polyscience Corporation (Nile, IL,
USA) and Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA). These
standards include: methyl hexanoate (caproate), methyl octanoate
(caprylate), methyl decanoate (caprate), methyl dodecanoate
(laurate), methyl tetradecanoate (myristate), methyl palmitoleate,
methyl hexadecanoate (palmitate), methyl oleate, methyl linole-
ate, methyl linolenate, methyl stearate, methyl arachidate, methyl
docasonate (behenate), and methyl (erucate). Standard solutions
were prepared in hexane at concentration 1 mg/mL.
acid in ether and finally MeOH to gave Ferulic acid (9.1 mg),
b-
sitosterol (69 mg) and glycerol-2-linoleneate (39.5 mg). Subfrac-
tions 40–41 (206.8 mg, eluted with 20% EtOAc in hexane), purified
on SPE amino column (20 g) using CHCl3 in isopropanol mixtures in
a manner of increasing polarities affording 38.2 mg of compound 1.
Fractions F (2.2 g, eluted with 50% EtOAc in hexanes) was
chromatographed over a silica gel columm (60 g) using mixtures of
hexanes–EtOAc in a manner of increasing polarities. Twenty one
subfractions (150 mL each) were collected. Subfraction 21
(191.7 mg, eluted with 40% EtOAc in hexanes) was purified on
SPE silica column (20 g) using with 3% MeOH in CHCl3, 5% MeOH in
CHCl3 and finally 6% MeOH in CHCl3 to afford 3-O-methyl-
quercetin (45 mg).
Fraction I (8.7 g, eluted with EtOAc) was mixed with 12 g
celite and 15 mL MeOH and dried. The dried slurry was applied
onto the top of VLC columm packed with silica gel (200 g). The
columm was eluted with CHCl3–MeOH (100:0–0:100). Ten
subfractions (1 L each) were collected. Subfraction 7–8 (3.6 g,
eluted with 15–20% MeOH in CHCl3) was purified on silica
column (170 g column) using CHCl3/MeOH mixtures in a manner
GC/MS analysis: The mixture was analysed by GCMS using the
same conditions used for the analysis of volatile oil. Results are
summarized in Table 3.
3.6. Alkaline hydrolysis of compound 1
5 mg of compound 1 in 5% dry KOH–MeOH (2 mL) was heated
under reflux for 4 h. The reaction mixture was neutralized with 2 N
HCl and extracted with CHCl3. The CHCl3 layer was subjected to TLC
and GC/MS analysis. The TLC to identify oleanolic acid [TLC; Rf 0.35
hexane/acetone (3:1)] and GC/MS after methylation with diazo-
methane to give palmitoyl methyl ester (Rt 19.25 min). The sugar
wasidentifiedas
D-glucosebycomparisonwithauthenticsamples of
D
-glucose and -galcatose through silica gel TLC of the aqueous layer
D
of increasing polarities to yield
anoside (297.8 mg).
b
-sitosterol-3-O-
b
-
D
-glucopyr-
using solvent system EtOAc/MeOH/HOAc/H2O (11:2:2:2) followed
by spraying with anisaldehyde/H2SO4 and heating.