10.1002/chem.201701316
Chemistry - A European Journal
FULL PAPER
1 M KOH (100ml), diluted with water to volume 300 ml and precipitated
with 1 M H3PO4 (~100ml to pH 1-2). The solid material was collected by
filtration and washed with water (3x50 ml). The KOH/H3PO4 precipitation
was repeated one more time. After second filtration the solid was washed
with water (3x50 ml) and after air drying it was washed with diethyl ether
(25 ml) to prevent conglutination during vacuum drying. After drying this
mixture (5.6 g) of 1a with R8BU[4] (10 %) was stirred in acetone (60 ml)
for one day. Solid material at first becomes gum like substance, but later
solidifies (large pieces of material were disintegrated by ultrasound and
crushed with spatula). The solid was collected by filtration and washed
with acetone (2x10ml) and Et2O (20 ml). After vacuum drying white solid
(4.4 g) still contained 1a with R8BU[4] (4%). Material was homogenized
by mixing it with acetonitrile (50 ml) and adding water until complete
dissolution. Solution was filtered and evaporated to dryness. After drying
in vacuum the solid material was further stirred in acetone (60 ml) and
next day it was collected by filtration. After filtration it was washed with
acetone (2x10 ml) and with diethyl ether (20 ml). After vacuum drying the
product was obtained as an off white solid in yield (3.84 g, 62 %). The
purity of the product was estimated by 1H NMR in DMSO-d6 (integration
with internal standards hydroquione and TBAI) to be >95 %, this
corresponds to a molecular weight ~ 2395 g·mol-1.
collected and the solids were combined. Solid material was dried from
water on air, washed with Et2O (2x10 ml) and dried in vacuum.
Derivative 2a was obtained as a white solid (127 mg, 41%). This batch
molecular weight corresponded to the theoretical value within
experimental error ≈2%.
Please note that it is sometimes more difficult to force 2a to solidify from
its gum like form, even when the crude mixture appears to contain only
2a macrocycle and the corresponding R8BU[4] derivative.
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.88 (s, 12H), 5.35 (s, 12H), 4.83 (s,
12H), 3.49 (s, 12H), 3.39 (s, 12H), 2.21 (s, 24H), 1.88 (s, 12H), 1.74 (s,
12H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 174.1, 158.9, 158.5, 68.4, 47.6, 43.0,
31.0, 23.4. MALDI-TOF MS: for [C78H108N24O36
+
K]+ theoretical:
1995.700, experimental: 1995.699 ± 0.007. Melting point: 202 - 206 °C.
Dodeca(methyl-3-propylcarboxylate)bambus[6]uril 2b
2a (0.1 g, 0.051 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (10 ml) with PTSA (9.3
mg, 0.049 mmol) and the solution was left standing in sealed reaction
vessel for 8 days. MeOH was evaporated and the residue was dissolved
in DCM (20 ml). Solution was washed with 5 % NaHCO3 (2x50 ml) and
water (50 ml). Centrifugation was used to speed up the phase separation.
DCM was evaporated and product was dissolved in CH3CN and
evaporated again. After drying in vacuum the ester was obtained as a
slightly sticky solid (92 mg, 84%). After esterification the molecular weight
corresponds to theoretical value. The ester derivative 2b is not stable in
chloroform solution and hydrolyzes more readily than 1b (see figure S29).
1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ 5.34 (s, 12H), 4.88 (s, 12H), 3.63 – 3.54
(m, 48H), 3.50 – 3.41 (m, 12H), 2.37 – 2.28 (m, 24H), 2.01 – 1.95 (m,
12H), 1.88 – 1.79 (m, 12H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD3CN) δ 174.4, 160.3,
160.1, 69.6, 52.1, 49.5, 44.2, 31.9, 24.6. MALDI-TOF MS: for
[C90H132N24O36 + Na]+ theoretical: 2147.913, experimental: 2147.912 ±
0.002. Melting point: 66 - 69 °C.
The preparation was performed two times at lower scale (3 g of starting
glycoluril) under same reaction and similar isolation conditions. The
yields were (1.87, 58%) and (1.67, 52%). All batches displayed same
supramolecular behaviour after their corresponding molecular weight was
determined.
The acetone washing fractions contain 1a and R8BU[4] in approximately
1:1 ratio and this mixture can be separated by column chromatography
(MF - THF). After complete elution of R8BU[4] 1a is eluted by MeOH
(partial ester formation – must be hydrolyzed).
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.95 (s, 12H), 5.26 (s, 12H), 4.80 (s,
12H), 3.62 – 3.43 (m, 12H), 3.43 – 3.20 (m, 12H), 2.18 (t, J = 7.3 Hz,
24H), 1.70 (s, 12H), 1.50 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 36H), 1.39 – 1.15 (m, 24H). 13
C
NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 174.3, 158.8, 158.5, 68.2, 47.8, 43.4, 33.6,
27.8, 25.8, 24.1. MALDI-TOF MS: for [C102H156N24O36 +Na]+ theoretical:
2316.101, experimental: 2316.103 ± 0.018. Melting point: 163°C collapse
of particles to amorphous (gum like) solid 169-174 °C liquid.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (13-
15576S) and MEYS CR (projects LM2011028 and LO1214). We
acknowledge the CEITEC Core Facilities supported by the
CIISB research infrastructure (LM2015043, funded by MEYS
CR) for their support in obtaining the scientific data presented in
this paper.
Dodeca(5-methoxy-5-oxopentyl)bambus[6]uril 1b
1a (0.2 g, 0.087 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (20 ml) with PTSA (16.6
mg, 0.087 mmol) and the solution was left standing in sealed reaction
vessel for 3 days. MeOH was evaporated and the residue was dissolved
in DCM (15 ml). Solution was washed with 10 % NaHCO3 (20 ml) and
water (3x20 ml). Centrifugation was used to speed up the phase
separation. DCM was evaporated and product was dissolved in CH3CN
and evaporated again. After drying in vacuum the ester was obtained as
viscous oil that slowly crystalize to sticky solid (0.19 g, 87%). After
esterification the molecular weight corresponds to theoretical. The ester
derivative 1b is not stable in chloroform solution and slowly hydrolyzes
(see figure S19).
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.47 (s, 12H), 4.76 (s, 12H), 3.63 (s, 48H),
3.44 – 3.34 (m, 12H), 2.30 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 24H), 1.82 – 1.76 (m, 12H),
1.68 – 1.52 (m, 36H), 1.38 – 1.27 (m, 24H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 173.9, 159.4, 159.1, 77.4, 77.4, 77.2, 76.9, 69.3, 51.6, 48.7, 44.1, 34.0,
28.0, 26.4, 24.6. MALDI-TOF MS: for [C114H180N24O36 +Na]+ theoretical:
2484.289, experimental: 2484.290 ± 0.003. Melting point: liquid > 100 °C.
Keywords: anion recognition • macrocycles • bambusurils • self-
assembly • supramolecular chemistry
[1]
M. J. Langton, C. J. Serpell, P. D. Beer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016,
55, 1974–1987.
[2]
[3]
S. Kubik, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3648.
N. H. Evans, P. D. Beer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11716–
11754.
[4]
[5]
P. A. Gale, E. N. W. Howe, X. Wu, Chem 2016, 1, 351–422.
A. Bianchi, K. Bowman-James, E. García-España, Eds. ,
Supramolecular Chemistry of Anions, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1997.
J. L. Sessler, P. A. Gale, W.-S. Cho, Anion Receptor Chemistry, Royal
Society Of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
[6]
[7]
A. Schaly, R. Belda, E. García-España, S. Kubik, Org. Lett. 2013, 15,
6238–6241.
[8]
[9]
J. Suk, K.-S. Jeong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11868–11869.
M. Řezanka, M. J. Langton, P. D. Beer, Chem. Commun. 2015, 51,
4499–4502.
M. J. Langton, S. W. Robinson, I. Marques, V. Félix, P. D. Beer, Nat.
Chem. 2014, 6, 1039–1043.
M. Lisbjerg, B. M. Jessen, B. Rasmussen, B. E. Nielsen, A. Ø.
Madsen, M. Pittelkow, Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 2647–2650.
M. Lisbjerg, B. E. Nielsen, B. O. Milhøj, S. P. A. Sauer, M. Pittelkow,
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 369–373.
Y. Hua, Y. Liu, C.-H. Chen, A. H. Flood, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
14401–14412.
Dodecakis(3-carboxypropyl)bambus[6]uril 2a
2,4-Bis(3-carboxypropyl) glycoluril (0.3 g, 0.95 mmol) and
paraformaldehyde (0.036 g, 1.2 mmol) were stirred in 1,4-dioxane (1.4
ml) at 80 °C (temperature of the heating block). After 5 min 96 % H2SO4
(40 μl) was added into the warm mixture. After 3 h 0.5 ml of DMSO was
added to improve stirring and the reaction was stopped 5 h after the
addition of acid. Reaction mixture was diluted with 1 M KOH (5 ml),
extracted with CH2Cl2 (3x10ml) and precipitated with 1M H3PO4 (5 ml).
The solid was separated by centrifugation and liquid was decanted. The
material was dissolved, precipitated and separated one more time. Then
it was suspended in water (10 ml) and collected by filtration. After
standing at RT more material precipitated from the filtrate, it was
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
K. I. Assaf, M. S. Ural, F. Pan, T. Georgiev, S. Simova, K. Rissanen, D.
Gabel, W. M. Nau, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6852–6856.
F. Biedermann, H.-J. Schneider, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5216–5300.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.