Communication
ChemComm
of etoposide either alone or in combination with the peptides
(Nap-GFFpYK) without conjugation. It is likely that the improve-
ment in water solubility resulted from the phosphoric acid group
on the peptidyl moiety, and the enhanced cellular uptake is due
to the effective endocytosis of the nanofibers. Additionally,
etoposide can be released from the nanofibers by the activity
of cytosolic carboxylesterase, constituting a slow release mecha-
nism that reduces the efflux of the drug caused by the ABCB
family of drug pumps.
This work was financial supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (NSFC) projects (Grant no.
81672740, 81972687 and 81874167).
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
1
Z. Wang, Z. Li, D. Zhang, L. Miao and G. Huang, Drug Delivery, 2015,
2, 79–85.
2
2
C. Che, G. Yang, C. Thiot, M. C. Lacoste, J. C. Currie, M. Demeule,
A. Regina, R. Beliveau and J. P. Castaigne, J. Med. Chem., 2010, 53,
2
814–2824.
3
4
5
6
7
E. G. Gibson, M. M. King, S. L. Mercer and J. E. Deweese, Chem. Res.
Toxicol., 2016, 29, 1541–1548.
Y. Pommier, E. Leo, H. Zhang and C. Marchand, Chem. Biol., 2010,
17, 421–433.
A. K. Mohanty, F. Dilnawaz, C. Mohanty and S. K. Sahoo,
Drug Delivery, 2010, 17, 330–342.
Z. Wang, Z. Wang, D. Liu, X. Yan, F. Wang, G. Niu, M. Yang and
X. Chen, Angew. Chem., 2014, 53, 1997–2001.
I. Landini, A. Lapucci, A. Pratesi, L. Massai, C. Napoli, G. Perrone,
P. Pinzani, L. Messori, E. Mini and S. Nobili, Oncotarget, 2017, 8,
9
6062–96078.
Fig. 4 Anti-tumor activity of Nap-GFFpYK-etoposide1/2 (NFE1/2) in LLC/
8
9
Y. Yuan, L. Wang, W. Du, Z. Ding, J. Zhang, T. Han, L. An, H. Zhang
and G. Liang, Angew. Chem., 2015, 54, 9700–9704.
J. L. Markman, A. Rekechenetskiy, E. Holler and J. Y. Ljubimova,
Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2013, 65, 1866–1879.
0 H. Wang, Z. Feng, Y. Wang, R. Zhou, Z. Yang and B. Xu, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2016, 138, 16046–16055.
1 Q. Wang, N. Jiang, B. Fu, F. Huang and J. Liu, Biomater. Sci., 2019, 7,
4
T1 cells and LLC/4T1 multi-drug resistant cells tumor model. (A, C, E and
G) Tumor volume curves during the curing process. (B, D, F and H) Excised
tumor weight after the treatment process. The doses of etoposide, F and
ꢀ1
NFE1/2 for peritumoral injection are 5, 7.72 and 13.41 mg kg (equimolar
1
1
1
1
concentration), respectively. **, P o 0.01; ***, P o 0.001.
4
888–4911.
2 D. Zheng, Y. Chen, S. Ai, R. Zhang, Z. Gao, C. Liang, L. Cao, Y. Chen,
Z. Hong, Y. Shi, L. Wang, X. Li and Z. Yang, Research, 2019, 4803624.
3 Q. Feng, J. Liu, X. Li, Q. Chen, J. Sun, X. Shi, B. Ding, H. Yu, Y. Li and
X. Jiang, Small, 2017, 13.
4 H. Wang, Z. Feng and B. Xu, Angew. Chem., 2019, 58, 10423–10432.
5 S. Kiran, Z. Hai, Z. Ding, L. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Zhang and G. Liang,
Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 1853–1856.
(NFE1/2) led to 75%–79% inhibition of tumor growth. These
results indicate that NFE1/2 possess much improved anti-
cancer activities compared to etoposide against multidrug-
resistant cancer cells.
1
1
In conclusion, to improve the water solubility and cell absorp-
tion efficiency of etoposide, we successfully synthesized and 16 I. Coin, M. Beyermann and M. Bienert, Nat. Protoc., 2007, 2,
3
247–3256.
separated two self-assembling peptide–etoposide nanofiber iso-
mers Nap-GFFpYK-etoposide1/2 (NFE1/2) and evaluated their
1
7 J. Li, Y. Gao, Y. Kuang, J. Shi, X. Du, J. Zhou, H. Wang, Z. Yang and
B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 9907–9914.
anticancer activities in MDR1-overexpressing LLC and 4T1 can- 18 R. Dahl, E. A. Sergienko, Y. Su, Y. S. Mostofi, L. Yang, A. M. Simao,
S. Narisawa, B. Brown, A. Mangravita-Novo, M. Vicchiarelli,
L. H. Smith, W. C. O’Neill, J. L. Millan and N. D. Cosford, J. Med.
Chem., 2009, 52, 6919–6925.
cer cells and experimental tumor models established with these
cells. Our data show that the etoposide-conjugated nanofibers
have markedly improved anticancer efficacy compared with that 19 J. Gao, J. Zhan and Z. Yang, Adv. Mater., 2020, 32, e1805798.
Chem. Commun.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020