Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
addition, the reaction mixture was irradiated for 12 min at
300 W at 110 1C. The product was extracted with CH2Cl2
(100 mL) and filtered to remove the salts. The solvent was
removed in vacuo. The resultant oil was washed with diethyl
ether (2 Â 100 mL). The product was then dried in vacuo at
80 1C to afford the product.
1-Methyl-3-octylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate 1. 1H NMR
(CD3CN): d 9.97 (s, ImC2-H), 7.60 (m, 1H, ImH), 7.44 (m, 1H,
ImH), 4.24 (t, 2H, 3JHH = 7 Hz, N-CH2), 4.04 (s, 3H, N-CH3),
3
1.84 (m, 2H, NCH2CH2), 1.21 (m, 10H), 0.76 (t, 3H, JHH
=
7 Hz, CH3) ppm. 13C {1H}NMR (CD3CN): d 137.17, 123.78,
122.03, 67.73, 50.02, 36.60, 31.57, 30.21, 28.92, 28.85, 26.15,
22.46, 13.95 ppm. m/z (ESI+): 195 (M+, 100%).
Fig. 3 TEM images of silica I (a) and IV (b).
1-Methyl-3-decylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate 2. 1H NMR
(CD3CN): d 9.22 (s, ImC2-H), 7.51 (m, 1H, ImH), 7.48
(m, 1H, ImH), 4.19 (t, 2H, JHH = 7 Hz, N-CH2), 3.89
3
(s, 3H, N-CH3), 1.82 (m, 2H, NCH2CH2), 1.24 (m, 16H),
3
0.85 (t, 3H, JHH = 7 Hz, CH3) ppm. 13C {1H}NMR
(CD3CN): d 137.60, 124.47, 123.92, 50.32, 32.55, 30.66,
30.27, 30.18, 30.05, 29.93, 29.60, 26.65, 23.30, 14.35 ppm.
m/z (ESI+): 223 (M+, 30%).
1-Methyl-3-dodecylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate 3. 1H NMR
(CD3CN): d 9.18 (s, ImC2-H), 7.49 (m, 1H, ImH), 7.46 (m, 1H,
ImH), 4.18 (t, 2H, 3JHH = 7 Hz, N-CH2), 3.88 (s, 3H, N-CH3),
3
1.82 (m, 2H, NCH2CH2), 1.25 (m, 18H), 0.86 (t, 3H, JHH
=
7 Hz, CH3) ppm. 13C {1H}NMR (CD3CN): d 137.03, 123.96,
122.62, 66.90, 50.95, 36.30, 32.06, 30.15, 29.78 (2 carbons),
29.69, 29.56, 29.50, 29.10, 26.15, 22.81 ppm. m/z (ESI+): 251
(M+, 100%).
1-Methyl-3-hexadecylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate 4. 1H
NMR (CD3CN): d 9.12 (s, ImC2-H), 7.47 (m, 1H, ImH),
7.44 (m, 1H, ImH), 4.18 (t, 2H, JHH = 7 Hz, N-CH2), 3.88
Fig. 4 Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms recorded at 77 K
for silicas I (A), II (B), III (C), and IV (D).
3
(s, 3H, N-CH3), 1.82 (m, 2H, NCH2CH2), 1.26 (m, 26H), 0.87
3
(t, 3H, JHH = 7 Hz, CH3) ppm. 13C{1H} NMR (CD3CN):
using B100 mg of the siliceous material. The data were
obtained by liquid nitrogen adsorption and desorption at
various nitrogen partial pressures and were analysed by the
BJH (Barrett–Joyner–Halenda) and the BET (Brunauer–
Emmett–Teller) methods. The pore size distribution curve
was derived from the analysis of the adsorption branch of
the isotherm. Transmission electron micrographs were
recorded digitally with a Gtan slow-scan charge-coupled
device (CCD) using a Phillips CM120 Biotwin electron
microscope operating at 120 kV. The samples were prepared
by dispersing the powder products as a slurry in ethanol,
which was then deposited and dried on a holey carbon film on
a Cu grid.
d 137.46, 124.28, 123.14, 68.69, 50.36, 36.81, 32.56, 30.63,
30.27 (4 carbons), 30.18, 30.05, 29.99, 29.58, 26.64, 23.31,
14.33 ppm. m/z (ESI+): 307 (M+, 100%).
Synthesis of mesoporous silica templated with acidic ionic
liquids
In a typical synthesis [CnMIM]HSO4 (1.0 g, 3.42 mmol) and
tetraethoxysilane (TEOS, 0.71 g, 3.42 mmol) were dissolved in
ethanol under mild magnetic stirring. After homogenisation of
the mixture, water (0.68 g, 37.6 mmol) was added dropwise
and the mixture stirred until a homogenous gel was obtained.
The molar compositions of the starting mixtures were
1 TEOS : 1 [CnMIM]HSO4 : 11 H2O. The resulting mixtures
were then transferred to a PTFE-lined steel autoclave and
heated at 160 1C for 118 h. After hydrothermal treatment, the
mixtures were dried at 190 1C for 124 h and then calcined at
550 1C for 110 h with a temperature ramp rate of 165 1C minÀ1
under a stream of air to remove the template.
Synthesis of acidic ionic liquids
A typical synthesis involved mixing a 1.05 molar excess of
1-alkyl bromide (60.9 mmol) to 1-methylimidazole (4.76 g,
58.0 mmol). To this mixture was added NaHSO4 (B2.0 g).
The mixture was then irradiated in a microwave for 5 min at
300 W to a maximum temperature of 110 1C. After this time
additional NaHSO4 (B2.0 g) was added and irradiated again.
This procedure was repeated until a molar equivalent of
NaHSO4 (7.32 g, 60.9 mmol) had been added. After the final
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Australian Research
Council for funding.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2009 New J. Chem., 2009, 33, 1997–2000 | 1999