4
S. KAꢀNNAKAM ꢀT AL.
3
.2. Plant material
The roots of D. velutina were collected from Sahatsakhan district, Kalasin province, Thailand,
in October 2014. The plant material was identified by Ms Suttira Khumkratok, and a voucher
specimen was deposited as a reference (Khumkratok No. 4-12) at the Walai Rukhavej Botanical
Research Institute, Mahasarakham University.
3
.3. Extraction and isolation
The air-dried roots of D. velutina (5.5 kg) were extracted with CH Cl and MeOH over a period
2
2
of 3 days at room temperature, respectively (3 × 15 L). Removal of the solvent under reduced
pressure provided MeOH (80.5 g) crude extracts. The MeOH crude extract was further sepa-
rated by column chromatography over silica gel (Merck Art 7730) and eluted with a gradient
of ꢀtOAc-MeOH (100% ꢀtOAc, 90, 80 and 70% ꢀtOAc-MeOH each 5 L, respectively) to give
five fractions (A–ꢀ). Fraction A (4.5 g) was purified by Sephadex LH-20 column (150 g) with
100% MeOH (1.5 L) to afford compound 1 (12.5 mg) and compound 2 (20.5 mg). Fraction
B (6.5 g) was separated by Sephadex LH-20 column (150 g) eluted with 100% MeOH (1.5 L)
to give compound 5 (8.5 mg), compound 6 (10.5 mg) and compound 7 (14.5 mg). Finally,
fraction C (5.0 g) was subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column (150 g) eluted with 100% MeOH
(
1 L) to yield compound 3 (15.0 mg) and compound 4 (16.5 mg).
Dalvelutinoside (1): White amorphous powder; m.p. 218.0–219.0 °C; [ꢀ] −62.8 (c 1.0,
2
0
D
−1 1
DMSO); UV λmax (DMSO) 244, 262, 309 nm; IR νmax (KBr): 3410, 1665, 1540, 1500 cm ; H NMR
(
400 MHz, in DMSO-d ) δ : 12.92 (1H, s, OH-5), 9.25 (1H, s, OH-4′), 8.28 (1H, s, H-2), 6.88 (1H,
6
H
s, H-6′), 6.72 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-8), 6.59 (1H, s, H-3′), 6.47 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 5.41 (1H, d,
J = 4.8 Hz, OH-2″), 5.13 (1H, d, J = 4.4 Hz, OH-4″), 5.07 (1H, d, J = 5.6 Hz, OH-3″), 5.06 (1H, d,
J = 7.2 Hz, H-1″), 4.61 (1H, t, J = 5.4 Hz,OH-6″), 3.72 (3H, s, OCH ′), 3.70 (1H, m, H-6″), 3.64
3
–5
(
3H, s, OCH ′), 3.46 (1H, m, H-6″), 3.45 (1H, m, H-3″), 3.32 (1H, m, H-5″), 3.29 (1H, m, H-2″),
3
–2
13
3
1
1
6
.18 (1H, m, H-4″). C NMR (100 MHz, in DMSO-d ) δ : 180.1 (C-4), 162.7 (C-7), 161.3 (C-5),
6
C
57.0 (C-9), 155.7 (C-2), 152 (C-2′), 147.7 (C-4′), 141 (C-5′), 120.4 (C-3), 116.4 (C-6′), 108.8 (C-1′),
05.7 (C-10), 100.7 (C-3′), 99.7 (C-1″), 99.3 (C-6), 94.4 (C-8), 77.0 (C-3″), 76.2 (C-5″), 72.9 (C-2″),
+
9.4 (C-4″), 60.4 (C-6″), 56.5 (C-5′, OCH ), 55.8 (C-2′, OCH ); HRꢀSIMS m/z: 515.1161 [M + Na]
3
3
(
calcd. for C H O Na, 515.1165).
23 24 12
3
.4. Acidic hydrolysis and HPLC analysis
A solution of dalvelutinoside (1) (2 mg) in 1 M HCl (1.0 mL) was heated at reflux for 1 h and
then the reaction mixture was neutralised with an equal volume of 1 M NaOH and extracted
with CH Cl (5 mL). The sugar moiety was identified as glucose by co-TLC analysis (ꢀtOAC:
2
2
MeOH: H O, 1:8:1) of the aqueous solution in comparison with an authentic glucose. In
2
addition, the glucose was identified as D-glucose by HPLC analysis (column: lichrocart-NH2
(
250 × 4.0 mm), carrier: 82% ACN in H O (1.5 mL/min), retention time: 8.133 min) in compar-
2
ison with an authentic D-glucose.
3
.5. Cytotoxicity assay
All isolated compounds (1–7) were subjected to cytotoxic evaluation against KB (human
epidermoid carcinoma) and HeLa (human cervical carcinoma) cell lines employing the