1
350
Vol. 56, No. 9
1
13
Table 1. H- and C-NMR Spectral Data of Compounds 1 and 1a in CD OD
3
1
13
H
C
1
1a
1
1a
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
1
2
3
163.28 (s)
112.10 (d)
146.08 (d)
128.20 (d)
113.55 (d)
160.37 (s)
114.32 (s)
155.11 (s)
113.38 (s)
26.11 (t)
163.58 (s)
111.67 (d)
146.31 (d)
127.97 (d)
113.92 (d)
161.12 (s)
115.30 (s)
154.88 (s)
113.24 (s)
26.33 (t)
6.17 (1H, d, Jꢁ9.5)
7.81 (1H, d, Jꢁ9.5)
7.34 (1H, d, Jꢁ8.5)
6.81 (1H, d, Jꢁ8.3)
6.18 (1H, d, Jꢁ9.5)
7.84 (1H, d, Jꢁ9.5)
7.34 (1H, d, Jꢁ8.5)
6.84 (1H, d, Jꢁ8.5)
1
ꢂa
ꢂb
ꢂ
3.14 (1H, dd, Jꢁ14.2, 5.2)
3.18 (1H, dd, Jꢁ14.5, 7.3)
4.06 (1H, dd, Jꢁ6.7, 5.5)
3.18 (1H, dd, Jꢁ13.9, 2.4)
2.92 (1H, dd, Jꢁ13.9, 10.3)
3.67 (1H, dd, Jꢁ10.3, 2.4)
85.94 (d)
73.81 (s)
24.70 (q)
26.27 (q)
103.46 (d)
74.87 (d)
77.67 (d)
71.37 (d)
77.84 (d)
62.49 (t)
79.39 (d)
73.86 (s)
25.42 (q)
25.49 (q)
ꢂ
gem-(CH3)2
1.22 (3H, s)
1.29 (3H, s)
1.30 (3H, s)
1.31 (3H, s)
G-1
G-2
G-3
G-4
G-5
G-6a
G-6b
4.15 (1H, d, Jꢁ7.3)
3.15 (1H, dd, Jꢁ9.2, 7.4)
3.18 (1H, dd, Jꢁ9.2, 8.6)
3.26 (1H, dd, Jꢁ9.2, 9.0)
3.10—3.15 (1H, m)
3.61 (1H, dd, Jꢁ12.1, 5.7)
3.76 (1H, dd, Jꢁ11.9, 2.4)
d in ppm from TMS, J value in Hz, r.t.
2
5
The structure of 1 was further established by 2D-NMR
Praeroside VI (1) White powder; mp 130.5—132.5 °C (decomp.), [a]
(log e): 326.0 nm (3.70),
D
1
1
ꢀ1.0° (cꢁ1.0, MeOH). UV (MeOH): l
studies, particularly H– H correlated spectroscopy (COSY),
heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC) and nu-
clear Overhauser enhancement and exchange spectroscopy
NOESY). Correlations in HMBC and NOESY revealed pro-
ton–carbon sequences from H-2ꢂ to C-8 and G-C-1, H-1ꢂ to
C-7, C-8 and C-9, respectively.
max
ꢀ
(
MeOHꢀCH CO Na) 376.5 nm. EI-MS (70 eV): m/z (rel. int., %): 426 (M ,
3 2
1
), 408 (2), 264 (26), 247 (38), 246 (34), 229 (29), 205 (64), 176 (100), 175
86). HR-EI-MS: m/z: 426.1525 (Calcd for C H O , 426.1526). H- and
C-NMR: see Table 1.
Enzymatic Hydrolysis of 1 Enzymatic hydrolysis of 1 (20 mg) with
cellulase (20 mg) in H O (5 ml) at 40 °C under stirring for 2 d afforded an
1
(
20 26 10
1
3
(
2
aglycone (1a) and sugar moiety. 1a (4.5 mg) was isolated from n-BuOH sol-
Compounds 2 and 3 are also simple coumarin glycosides.
uble part of reaction mixture.
28)
2
and 3 were identified as apiosylskimmin and hymex-
(
2ꢀR)-7-Hydroxy-8-(2ꢀ,3ꢀ-dihydroxy-3ꢀ-methylbutyl)-coumarin (1a)
elsin by comparison of their structural data with those of White powder; mp 135.0—137.0 °C (decomp.); [a]D ꢀ46.0° (cꢁ0.50,
29)
25
MeOH).
authentic samples.
Apiosylskimmin (2) White powder; mp 197.0—198.0 °C (decomp.);
Nonglycosidic simple coumarins 4, 5, 6, and 7 were identi-
2
5
[
a] ꢃ69.5° (cꢁ1.0, pyridine). UV (MeOH): l (log e): 319.0 nm (4.04);
D max
ꢀ ꢀ ꢀ
3
0)
31)
fied as umbelliferone, scopoletin, isofraxidin, and 8-car-
FAB-MS: m/z: 457 [MꢀH] , 325 [MꢃapiꢀH] , 163 [Mꢃ(apiꢀglc)ꢀH] .
32)
2
5
boxy-7-hydroxy coumarin based on analysis of their physi-
Hymexelsin (3) White powder; [a]D ꢃ104.4° (cꢁ0.50, EtOH); UV
cal and spectral data (MS, H- and C-NMR spectra, H– H (MeOH): lmax (log e): 337.5 nm (3.75), 291.0 nm (3.68); FAB-MS: m/z: 485
1
13
1
1
ꢃ
[
MꢃH] .
COSY, HMQC, HMBC experiments) and by comparison
with literature values.
This is the first reported identification of simple coumarin
Umbelliferone (4) Colorless needles; mp 226.0—227.5 °C (decomp.);
UV (MeOH): l
(log e): 325.5 nm (3.88). EI-MS (70 eV): m/z (rel. int.,
max
ꢀ
%
): 162 (M , 100), 134 (89), 105 (15), 78 (16), 77 (8).
Scopoletin (5) Colorless needles; mp 202.0—203.0 °C (decomp.); UV
MeOH): lmax (log e): 344.0 nm (4.14), 297.5 nm (3.86), 253.5 nm (3.86).
(
7) as a constituent of plant materials.
(
ꢀ
Experimental
General Experimental Procedures Melting points were recorded using (35), 135 (1), 121 (11).
a Yanagimoto melting point apparatus without correction. UV spectra were
Isofraxidin (6) Colorless needles; mp 149.0—150.0 °C (decomp.); UV
EI-MS (70 eV): m/z (rel. int., %): 192 (M , 100), 177 (54), 164 (21), 149
1
13
recorded using Shimadzu 1600. H- and C-NMR spectra were recorded on (MeOH): lmax (log e): 342.0 nm (3.74). EI-MS (70 eV): m/z (rel. int., %):
a JNM-LA 500 spectrometer and a JEOL AL 400. FAB-MS spectra were 222 (M , 100), 207 (25), 194 (15), 179 (18), 161 (5), 151 (10), 149 (4), 133
ꢀ
obtained using a JMS-DX 302 mass spectrometer. Optical rotations were de- (5), 123 (13), 108 (7), 113 (100).
termined for solutions in MeOH using a JASCO DIP-140 polarimeter.
Plant Material Peucedanum praeruptorum DUNN. (Umbelliferae) was
collected from Ringan Town, Zhejiang Province, P. R. China, in August
8-Carboxy-7-hydroxy Coumarin (7) White powder; mp 210 °C (de-
comp.); UV (MeOH): lmax (log e): 333.0 nm (4.03), 258.0 nm (3.50). IR:
KBr
n
max 3600—2600, 1730, 1715, 1610, 1505, 1410, 1360, 1250, 1230,
ꢃ1
ꢀ
2
000 during the flowering season. A voucher specimen was identified by 840 cm . EI-MS (70 eV): m/z (rel. int., %): 206 (M , 7), 188 (23), 162 (97),
Prof. Xiao Luwei at Zhejiang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and 160 (19), 134 (100), 132 (6), 105 (18), 78 (20), 77 (11).
deposited at the herbarium of Meiji Pharmaceutical University.
Extraction and Isolation Pulverized roots of Peucedanum praerupto-
Acknowledgement The authors are grateful to medical doctor Qian
rum (2.75 kg) were extracted with water under reflux to give 638.6 g of ex- Xiao Hua at Ringan Town Hospital, Zhejiang Province, P. R. China, for sup-
tract. The water extract (638 g) was fractionated with Diaion HP-20 and then port in the collection of Bai-Hua Qianhu, Peucedanum praeruptorum.
HW-40F to give seven fractions, followed by HPLC with ODS (C18) and/or
Develosil (C30) using a MeOH–H O solvent system to yield 1 (98.6 mg), 2 References and Notes
2
(87.7 mg), 3 (6.3 mg), 4 (15.5 mg), 5 (9.7 mg), 6 (3.9 mg) and 7 (23.4 mg).
1) Part XXVI: Okada Y., Ishii H., Zhang Y., Baba M., Okuyama T., Phar-