The structure of 1 was finally established by 2D NMR
experiments. The proton and protonated carbon signals in
the NMR spectra of 1 were unambiguously assigned by the
1
1
HSQC experiment. Extensive analysis of the Hꢀ H
COSY and HMBC spectroscopic data of 1 respectively
in MeOH-d and DMSO-d allowed the planar structure of
4
6
the nucleus with the tetracyclic ring system to be defined as
shown (Figure 2), which revealed unequivocally a cucur-
bita-1,5-diene-3,11-dione nucleus for 1 identical to that of
machilaminosides A and B isolated from the same material
4
before. In addition, HMBC correlations of C-16, C-20,
0
0
0
0
C-2 , C-4 , C-5 , and C-6 with respective hydroxy protons,
together with the chemical shift values of these carbons,
located a hydroxy group at each of the six carbons, res-
0
0
pectively. The connection of a hexose moiety (C-1 ꢀC-6 )
0
to C-23 via the quaternary carbon C-2 was clearly demon-
0
0
strated by the HMBC correlations from H-1 a and H-1 b
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
to C-2 and C-3 ; from H-3 to C-1 , C-2 , C-4 , C-5 , and
0
0
0
C-23; from OH-2 to C-1 , C-2 , and C-23; and from H-23
0
0
0
to C-1 and C-2 . Meanwhile, the key correlations of H-3
0
0
0
1
1
and C-24, H-24 and C-3 , and H-1 a/H-1 b and C-22, along
0
Figure 2. (a) Hꢀ H COSY (thick lines) and main HMBC (red
arrows) correlations of 1. (b) Key NOESY correlations (blue
arrows) for the side chain moiety of 1.
0
0
with the chemical shifts of C-1 (δ 74.3), C-2 (δ 88.0), C-3
δ 83.2), and C-24 (δ 85.2), unequivocally established the
(
0
0
linkage of C-3 and C-24, and C-1 and C-22 via an oxygen
atom to form two fused five-membered rings in the side
chain of the nucleus. Furthermore, the linkage of C-22
and C-25 via an oxygen atom to form another five-
membered ring was suggested by the chemical shifts of
C-22 (δ 122.7) and C-25 (δ 84.9) and the accurate assign-
ment of the ten exchangeable hydroxy signals, together
withthe absence ofOH-25 and OH-22. Thiswas confirmed
by the molecular formula of 1. Moreover, an HMBC
correlation from H-1 to C-2 indicated that the β-D-
glucopyranosyl moiety was located at C-2 of the nucleus.
Accordingly, the planar structure of 1 was determined as
depicted in Figure 2 a.
In addition, the presence of NOE correlations of OH-20/
H-16 and H -18 and H -21/H-12β and H-17 and the
absence of an NOE correlation of H-16/H -21 indicated
3
3
3
thatfreerotation ofthe single bondbetween C-17and C-20
was limited and possessed a major conformation in the
solution state as shown in Figure 2 b, supporting the 20R
configurationin1. Thisisalsoconsistent withthatof all the
6
,7
reported cucurbitane derivatives.
0
0
0
0
The NOE correlations of H-3 /H-23, H-24, and OH-2 ,
0
0
H-23/H-24, and H -26 and H-1 b/OH-2 unambiguously
3
revealed that these protons were cofacial and arbitrarily
0
defined as having a β-orientation. H -27 and H-1 a were
assigned to be R-configuration judging from the NOE
3
The configuration of 1 was elucidated from NOESY
correlations and J-based configurational analysis com-
bined with circular dichroism (CD) data. NOE correla-
0
0
0
correlations of H-1 a/H -27, H-4 , and OH-4 and H -27/
0
3
3
OH-4 . On the basis of the 20R configuration in 1, the
crucial NOE correlations of OH-20/H-23, H-24, and
H -26, and H -21/H-1 b and H-12β and the absence of
an NOE correlation of OH-20/H-1 b suggested that the
flexibility of the unique tricyclic ring system in the side
chain was severely limited and possessed a major confor-
mation in the solution state as shown in Figure 2 b, which
indicated a 22R,23S,24S,2 S,3 S configuration for 1. The
lowest-energy 3D conformation, obtained by Monte Carlo
searching with the MMFF molecular mechanics force field
tions of H-7β/H -19, H-8/H-15β, H-16, H -18, and H -19,
3
3
3
0
and H-16/H-15β and H -18 indicated that these protons
3
3
3
0
were oriented on the same side of the nucleus, whereas
NOE correlations of H-10/H -29 and H -30, H-15R/H-7R
3
3
and H -30, and H-12R/H-17 and H -30 revealed that they
3
3
were oriented on the other side of the ring system. These
data suggested that the configuration of the tetracyclic ring
system of 1 was identical to those of cucurbitane deriva-
0
0
4
,6,7
tives.
In the CD spectrum of 1, negative Cotton effects
8
at 335 (Δε ꢀ4.14) and 242 (Δε ꢀ3.85) nm and positive
Cotton effects at 298 (Δε þ4.48) and 275 (Δε þ6.68) nm
indicated that the configuration of the nucleus moiety was
using the SPARTAN 04 program, was consistent with
that assigned by the NOESY data (Supporting Informa-
0
0
0
0
0
tion, Figure S2). In the 4 ,5 ,6 -triolyl unit, the 3 ,4 -threo-
0
4
,7b
0
identical to that of the reported cucurbitane analogues.
4
of small J
,5 -erythro configuration was assigned by the magnitude
3
3
(2.4 Hz) and large J
0
0
0
0
(8.0 Hz)
H-3 ,H-4
H-4 ,H-5
9
coupling constants and the NOE correlations of H-1 a/
0
(
6) (a) Gamlath, C. B.; Gunatilaka, A. A. L.; Alvi, K. A.; Atta ur, R.;
Balasubramaniam, S.Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 3225. (b) Kanchanapoom,
T.; Kasai, R.; Yamasaki, K. Phytochemistry 2002, 59, 215.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
H-4 and OH-4 , H-3 /H-5 and OH-5 , and H-4 /H -6 (for
2
(
7) (a) Chen, J. C.; Chiu, M. H.; Nie, R. L.; Cordellb, G. A.; Qiuc,
detailed J-based configuration analysis, see Supporting
S. X. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 386. (b) Yoshikawa, M.; Morikawa, T.;
Kobayashi, H.; Nakamura, A.; Matsuhira, K.; Nakamura, S.; Matsuda,
H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 428. (c) Restivo, R. J.; Bryan, R. F.;
Kupchan, S. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1973, 892.
10
Information Figure S3). This, combined with the 3 S
0
(8) Spartan ’04; Wavefunction, Inc.: Irvine, CA
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 11, 2011
2
858