Organic Process Research & Development 2001, 5, 61−64
Synthesis of Tenidap: An Improved Process for the Preparation of
5-Chloro-2-oxindole-1-carboxamide†
P. Rajender Kumar, P. Satish Goud, S. Raju, M. Sailaja, M. R. Sarma, and G. Om Reddy*
Process Chemistry R&D, Dr. Reddy’s Research Foundation, Bollaram road, Miyapur Hyderabad, India 500 050
Abstract:
An industrially viable, robust, and economic process is devel-
oped for Tenidap sodium and its important intermediate
5-chloro-2-oxindole-1-carboxamide. Use of inorganic cyanates,
in place of organic isocyanates, makes the process simple and
commercially viable. The advantage of using acetic anhydride
and sodium acetate over reported reagents such as trifluoro-
acetic acid and its anhydride on industrial scale is described.
Figure 1.
Drastic reduction of DMAP in the final step and overall
improvement of yields makes the process economical.
drolysis with aqueous acetic acid gave 5-chloro-2-oxindole-
1-carboxamide (4) as shown in Scheme 1.
(b)Reaction of 5-chloro-2-oxidnole (2) with isobutyryl
isocyanate and cyclohexyl carbonyl isocyanate in toluene
gave the intermediate (5). Hydrolysis of (5) in potassium
hydroxide yielded 2-(5-chloro-2-ureidophenyl)acetic acid10
(6), which was cyclised with a mixture of trifluoroacetic acid
and trifluoroacetic anhydride to give the desired 5-chloro-
2-oxidnole-1-carboxamide (4) (Scheme 2).
(c)Reaction of 5-chloro-2-oxindole (2) with trichloroacetyl
isocyanate11 in toluene followed by warming the reaction
mixture to 80 °C to give 5-chloro-2-oxindole-1-carboxamide
(4) in one step (Scheme 3).
It is evident from the literature that the preparation of
the key intermediate (4) of tenidap sodium (1) is uneconomi-
cal and employs hazardous organic isocyanates. Further, the
reported process for condensation of thiophene-2-carbonyl
chloride with 5-chloro-2-oxindole-1-carboxamide (4) to
prepare tenidap (7) (Scheme 4) employs an excess of the
expensive base N,N-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), thereby
making the process cost-ineffective.
Therefore, it was felt necessary to develop an improved
process for the preparation of tenidap sodium (1) by
employing nonhazardous, inexpensive, and easy-to-handle
chemicals on large scale.
Introduction
Oxindole-1-carboxamide derivatives, particularly 5-chloro-
3-(2-thenoyl)-2-oxindole-1-carboxamide sodium salt, tenidap
sodium (1) (Figure 1), are for the treatment of rheumatoid
arthritis1 and osteoarthritis2. Tenidap is an inhibitor of
prostaglandin3 and interleukin-14 production in the body. It
inhibits both the enzymes cycloxygenase and 5-lypoxyge-
nase,5 which convert arachidonic acid into prostaglandin and
leukotrienes3, and exhibits superior activity compared to other
nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as
naproxen,6 piroxicam,7 diclofenac sodium,8 indomethacin,9
and so forth, currently available in the market. Tenidap
sodium has not been launched in the market because of toxic
effects found in clinical trials.
Introduction
5-Chloro-2-oxindole-1-carboxamide10 (4) is an important
intermediate in the preparation of tenidap sodium (1), which
is commonly prepared by one of the following methods.
(a)N-acylation of 5-chloro-2-oxindole (2) with chlorosul-
fonyl isocyanate produced intermediate (3) which on hy-
† DRF publication No. 99.
(1) Johnson, J. A.; Loeser, R.; Smith, D. M.; Turner, R. A. Agent Action 1990,
31, (1-2), 102.
Results and Discussion
The synthetic route discussed in this paper is presented
in Scheme 5. The salient features are discussed below.
(a) Expensive and highly reactive organic isocyanates are
substituted by inorganic cyanates which are not only
inexpensive but also easy to handle even at large scale
operations for the preparation of 2-(5-chloro-2-ureidophenyl)-
acetic acid (6).
(b) The cyclisation of 2-(5-chloro-2-ureidophenyl)acetic
acid (6) to 5-chloro-2-oxindole-1-carboxamide (4) is carried
out with acetic anhydride and sodium acetate, thereby
avoiding the expensive trifluoroacetic acid and trifluoroacetic
anhydride mixture. The above cyclisation can also be carried
(2) (a)Fernandes, J.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; Mineau, F.; Otterness, I.; Pelleteir, J.
P. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1994, 72 (1), Abstr. P 10.1.47. (b) Fernandes,
J. C.; Lopez-Anaya A.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; Mineau, F.; Otternes, I. G.;
Pelletier, J. P. Arthritis Rheum. 1994, 37 (9), Abstr. 1205.
(3) Carty, T..J.; Showell, H. J.; Loose, L. D.; Kadin, S. B. Arthritis Rheum.
1988, 31 (4), S 89.
(4) McDonald, B.; Loose, L.; Rosenwasser, L. J. Arthritis Rheum. 1988, 31
(4), S 17.
(5) Moilanen, E.; Alanko, J.; Asmawi, M. Z.; Vepaatalo, H. Eicosanoids 1988,
1, 35-39.
(6) Cavanaugh, M. J.; Finman, J. S.; Kirby, D. S.; Loose, L. D.; Ting, N.;
Weiner, E. S. Rheumatol. Eur. 1995, 24 (3), D35.
(7) Krasaka, A. R.; Kirby, D. S.; Loose, L. D.; Shanahan, W. R.; Ting, N.;
Weiner, E. S. ReV. Esp. Reumatol. 1993, 20(1), Th80.
(8) Wylie, G. ReV. Esp. Reumatol. 1993, 20(1), 306.
(9) Granger, D. N.; Panes, J.; Wallace, J. L.; Wolf, R. E. Arthritis Rheum. 1994,
37 (9), 1053.
(10) Kadin, S. B. U.S. Patent 4,556,672, 1985.
(11) Kelly, S. E. U.S. Patent 4,952,703, 1990.
10.1021/op000082b CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society and The Royal Society of Chemistry
Published on Web 12/07/2000
Vol. 5, No. 1, 2001 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
61